|
|
Post by hypnoticgenes on Nov 27, 2013 22:27:06 GMT -5
Wouldn't it make more sense to have a group of talented wrestlers at the top to represent the company?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Nov 27, 2013 22:31:10 GMT -5
It would
But in the WWE forum.
|
|
TheDieselTrain
Fry's dog Seymour
Chicks Dig Hootie.
Is Stone Cold gonna have to smack a bitch?? WHAT!!!?????
Posts: 23,724
|
Post by TheDieselTrain on Nov 27, 2013 22:46:07 GMT -5
Exactly. I hate that there is a "need" for a singular face when it's a group effort or its supposed to be
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2013 22:50:15 GMT -5
This is somehow, the most random thing I have ever read in "offtopic". Kudos.
WWE has always had a face from Hulk Hogan to Stone Cold. It's what has worked for them in the past, so Vince will always be on the lookout for the next icon.
|
|
|
|
Post by wildojinx on Nov 27, 2013 23:41:46 GMT -5
I dont know, i think adding eyes and a mouth to the WWE logo would be kind of creepy.
|
|
Crimson
Hank Scorpio
Thank you DWade
Posts: 6,511
|
Post by Crimson on Nov 27, 2013 23:48:55 GMT -5
I agree. Really wish the company would steer from going meta with their storylines.
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 11,003 
|
Post by Sparkybob on Nov 27, 2013 23:53:37 GMT -5
It's much easier to market and advertise one guy as the face of the company, as oppose to a large group.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe Neglia on Nov 28, 2013 0:13:03 GMT -5
It's much easier to market and advertise one guy as the face of the company, as oppose to a large group. Exactly. Whether it's Cena, Austin, Hogan or Sammartino, it's how it's always been, with very few short intermissions. It's a corporate thing, the spokescharacter. Disney has Mickey, Nintendo has Mario, Chuck E. Cheese has the disease-riddled rat. It's why the one gecko is still saving tons of money all these years later, while the group of cavemen only lasted a couple of years. |
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave is Correct on Nov 28, 2013 0:13:50 GMT -5
This is somehow, the most random thing I have ever read in "offtopic". Kudos. WWE has always had a face from Hulk Hogan to Stone Cold. It's what has worked for them in the past, so Vince will always be on the lookout for the next icon. Even before that they had Sammartino. |
|
|
|
Post by xxshoyuweeniexx on Nov 28, 2013 0:16:15 GMT -5
I for one think we could use a new right hand of the WWE instead of another new face, maybe a cool robot hand that shoots lasers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2013 0:22:00 GMT -5
In the ideal wrestling world, yes, it would make more sense to have a well-rounded cast of major characters. But the issue is that fans tend to gravitate toward one single individual, and this is hardly unique in wrestling. Look at shows with multiple cast members starring. Friends. The Walking Dead. Game of Thrones. Some people just tend to take precedent over others. It's not a bad thing, just a natural thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2013 0:25:51 GMT -5
Wouldn't it make more sense to have a group of talented wrestlers at the top to represent the company? I always thought so. And that's all I've got to say about that... |
|
saintpat
El Dandy
Release the hounds!!!
Posts: 7,664
|
Post by saintpat on Nov 28, 2013 0:36:11 GMT -5
No face. No beard.
Simple as that.
|
|
