|
|
Post by Instant Classic on Dec 11, 2013 15:32:34 GMT -5
|
|
BigWill
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 16,619
|
Post by BigWill on Dec 11, 2013 15:36:28 GMT -5
Good read.
It's articles like this that make me sad that the people who run WWE.com aren't also part of Creative.
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Dec 11, 2013 15:38:35 GMT -5
It's articles like this that make me sad that the people who run WWE.com aren't also part of Creative. At this point, I don't even blame creative. If Vince had the time to read every article on the website, he'd probably tear them a new one too, until they agreed to go along with his "vision". |
|
BigJerichool222
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
THE BIG DOG!
#NotInMySalad
Posts: 17,424
|
Post by BigJerichool222 on Dec 11, 2013 15:43:09 GMT -5
HAHA, poor Dean Ambrose and his non-important title.
|
|
Rican
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
July 17, 2011 - HHHe called it
Posts: 16,732
|
Post by Rican on Dec 11, 2013 15:45:06 GMT -5
They mentioned MITB but I hope them getting rid of MITB is the next change. It's time, IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by YellowJacketY2J on Dec 11, 2013 15:47:10 GMT -5
HAHA, poor Dean Ambrose and his non-important title. I wouldn't get rid of it. Just put the match back on the Wrestlemania card. |
|
|
|
Post by GuyOfOwnage on Dec 11, 2013 15:52:43 GMT -5
I actually dig the idea of one champion having to fend off two MITB contract holders. It'd give a much-needed shakeup to the predictable MITB cash-in formula.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Dec 11, 2013 15:53:40 GMT -5
I hadn't thought about it, but I love now that as soon as the Rumble is over we know (at least for that moment) what the main event of Mania would be. I won't miss three weeks of "WHO WILL HE CHOOSE?!" when we know who he'll choose.
|
|
Bo Rida
Fry's dog Seymour
Pulled one over on everyone.
Got away with it, this time.
Posts: 24,163
|
Post by Bo Rida on Dec 11, 2013 16:10:45 GMT -5
Damn! I was hoping all rematch clauses in contracts would now be void as they applied to the previous belts.
That would be a good chance.
This article also made me realise that it's a shame Sandow has already had an unsuccessful cash-in.
It would have been cool if he'd declared he was being honourable and taking his shot at WM only to have the rules changed on him, he could have become increasingly desperate until he was forced to cash-in at the wrong moment. Being punished for trying to do the right thing could have resulted in better character development rather than him just becoming more aggressive.
|
|
kevin
El Dandy
Posts: 7,516 
|
Post by kevin on Dec 11, 2013 16:30:22 GMT -5
With money in the bank I completely agree with the idea of making the IC the only mid card belt with unify it with the us belt make it lower card only or just get rid of it. Now we have two money in the banks still. One for the World title one for the IC title. MITB is far and away the most exciting match in wrestling history and the cash in the most exciting moment possible. Keeping two MITB matches is the best thing no matter what they decide.
|
|
JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,791
|
Post by JCBaggee on Dec 11, 2013 17:05:53 GMT -5
Two MitB winners might be fun for a year or two, but hopefully they'll go back to one briefcase and stick it back in the curtain jerk slot at WrestleMania.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2013 17:10:38 GMT -5
#6 should be a picture of Alberto with a circle with a line through it.
|
|
wisdomwizard
King Koopa
Too Salty
Watching you.
Posts: 11,087
|
Post by wisdomwizard on Dec 11, 2013 18:48:58 GMT -5
Title sounds a lot like 90% of Bleecher Report's articles.
|
|
