TGM
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,073
|
Post by TGM on Dec 23, 2013 12:49:10 GMT -5
 Now I've always assumed, apart from being very similar physical belts, the WCW title and the WHC were completely separate titles. |
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 23, 2013 12:52:53 GMT -5
WWE themselves said that the WCW and WHC title held the same lineage right before the title was unified so I guess that's the final verdict.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2013 12:56:51 GMT -5
The WHC title linage is whatever is convenient for the WWE at that moment. WWE.com lists Triple H as the first champion but WWE's WHC DVD and the build up to Orton/Cena claimed longer histories.
|
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Dec 23, 2013 13:37:12 GMT -5
The WHC title linage is whatever is convenient for the WWE at that moment. WWE.com lists Triple H as the first champion but WWE's WHC DVD and the build up to Orton/Cena claimed longer histories. ^This. In reality: The WHC was a splinter title off the WWE Title (which was founded as a splinter title from the NWA). The only thing that the WHC has in common with the NWA/WCW title is that it's "same" belt design. |
|
