Nr1Humanoid
Hank Scorpio
Is the #3 humanoid at best.
Posts: 5,605
|
Post by Nr1Humanoid on Jan 14, 2014 14:58:06 GMT -5
I love them myself, bring them on.
No movie should be exempt, the original will always be there.
Big fan.
|
|
|
Post by Bravo Echo November on Jan 14, 2014 15:26:54 GMT -5
If it's for a movie that didn't do too well initially and deserves another chance, yes.
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,372
|
Post by Push R Truth on Jan 14, 2014 15:32:33 GMT -5
My favorite movie of all time is a remake/reimaging (Carpenter's The Thing)
|
|
|
Post by mcmahonfan85 on Jan 14, 2014 15:43:14 GMT -5
some are good, some suck big time, and some movies do not need to be remade/rebooted
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Jan 14, 2014 15:49:05 GMT -5
I don't like when they're "remade".
But I don't mind if they're updated for a new age. Look at Scarface for example (although the original is a classic).
|
|
|
Post by xCompackx on Jan 14, 2014 16:15:13 GMT -5
I like a few remakes (Friday the 13th, My Bloody Valentine, and Total Recall was okay), and Robocop looks fun.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 122,182
Member is Online
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jan 14, 2014 16:57:03 GMT -5
I like a few remakes (Friday the 13th, My Bloody Valentine, and Total Recall was okay), and Robocop looks fun. I am also looking forward to Robocop. They don't tape over the original, and if anything, it often just calls more attention to the original, so I am for remakes.
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 14, 2014 17:00:22 GMT -5
If I liked the original, I don't watch remakes. If the original was shit, I may check them out.
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 14, 2014 17:02:08 GMT -5
I'm not against the very concept of remakes, but I wouldn't give a blanket "Remakes are great!" statement. Some of them are great, some of them are terrible. Same thing with "original" movies.
|
|
driver8
Tommy Wiseau
Young despite the years/Hope despite the times
Posts: 71
|
Post by driver8 on Jan 14, 2014 17:17:41 GMT -5
I think, like most people, I judge it on a case by case basis
That said, I'm not a fan of the "take an r-rated well regarded sci-fi movie from the 80s and make a lifeless, bland pg-13 version" trend that Robocop and Total Recall seem to exemplify.
|
|
|
Post by Joker on Jan 14, 2014 17:28:18 GMT -5
For every Thing, Oceans Eleven, The Fly or Fistful of Dollars there seem to be half a dozen remakes that are really not that good/terrible like Total Recall, Planet of the Apes, The Wicker Man, Godzilla (1998), Clash of the Titans or Poseidon.
I think the main reason is good remakes take the story and do something different with it or it's been so long nobody remembers that the film is a remake, a good idea is change the name if you can. I like The Departed but I Prefer Infernal Affairs the name change was a good move in my opinion. The Thing & The Fly take the idea down an entirely different route which is great & I like the orginals too, Posiedon and Psycho don't and both fail by being mostly dull/clones of the originals.
Of course sometimes these films are just bad remakes nobody wants (Oldboy?! Nightmare on Elm Street!) or plain suck because hollywood messes them up (Godzilla 98). Other times nostalgia or the previous actor in the movie is just too strong (Arnold Schwarzenegger films are going to be hard to remake as it's Arnie) likewise Clash of the Titans is great for it's Harryhausen special effects which most 80s children look back at fondly, the less said about the Worthington one with it's CGI and Robot Djinn the better.
I don't mind remakes but I do mind if they are clones, break childhood memories,fail to respect the source material or they flat out suck.
|
|
|
Post by Seth Drakin of Monster Crap on Jan 14, 2014 17:34:39 GMT -5
My favorite movie of all time is a remake/reimaging (Carpenter's The Thing) Same
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2014 18:31:00 GMT -5
Usually the best remakes are the ones with a timeless thematic story that can apply to any generation. Those remakes are essentially a remake in name only.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 14, 2014 18:38:59 GMT -5
Someone said it best in a remake thread a few weeks ago. Paraphrasing here, they said "If the actors are what made the movie, then a remake shouldn't even be considered. If the story outshined the actors involved, then a remake is okay". I couldn't agree with that more. Take Robocop for example. It wasn't a vehicle for Peter Weller. That role could have been filled by anyone. Updating it for a new audience makes sense.
On the other side of that, you have movies like Ghostbusters, Back to the Future, and Indiana Jones which all worked strictly based on the lead actor(s). You can't slap a fedora on some new actor and call him Indiana Jones, because it won't work. In wrestling terms, it's why multiple Doinks worked just fine but fake Razor was a complete failure.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2014 20:21:05 GMT -5
My favorite movie of all time is a remake/reimaging (Carpenter's The Thing) Holy shit, that was going to be my exact response when I saw the thread title.
|
|
Bad Moon
Unicron
for reasons known only to the goblins that live in my brain
Posts: 3,091
|
Post by Bad Moon on Jan 14, 2014 20:51:41 GMT -5
Remakes are good when they're warranted. If whoever's at the helm actually has something worthwile to add to the original work, great. When Carpenter remade The Thing From Another World, he made a completely different monster and introduced a whole new facet to the horror via the infection angle and the shapeshifting effects. When they remade the 1982 version in 2009, they just made the exact same movie with the exact same monster and actually a smaller cast of characters with less depth to them.
tl;dr: Remakes are good when they're good and bad when they're bad.
|
|