Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2014 14:04:03 GMT -5
Which is more important to you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hassan bin Sober on Apr 5, 2014 14:05:19 GMT -5
Reigns. Wins happen far too often these days.
|
|
|
|
Post by KobashiChop on Apr 5, 2014 14:06:59 GMT -5
The reign. We've seen guys have what should be career-making wins be blown apart all too often (Punk at MITB 2011 and Bryan at SS 2013 to name 2)
|
|
|
|
Post by TK The Friendly Robot on Apr 5, 2014 14:09:06 GMT -5
Definitely a title reign. A win is a win but if the momentum is killed a day or a week later by the ending of the reign then it totally takes any of the prestige or good feeling away from the win for me. Like it didn't even matter in the first place. Take the reign to a logical conclusion even a month or so later however and give it a payoff and I'm more than happy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2014 14:41:10 GMT -5
The reign. I mean, Bryan has been WWE champion and World Heavyweight champion already, but people are still waiting to REALLY see him as champ.
Also, take into account that Ziggler, Swagger, Del Rio, Mysterio, and Khali are all former champions but I personally at least can't think of anything memorable about their title reigns aside from winning the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by thelonewolf527 on Apr 5, 2014 14:45:00 GMT -5
Roman Reign
|
|
