|
Post by OGBoardPoster2005 on Oct 9, 2014 22:54:23 GMT -5
Are they blurred or are they unblurred?
|
|
|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Oct 9, 2014 23:16:46 GMT -5
Pretty much all WWF content is unblurred on the Network.
|
|
DjZonk
Don Corleone
Where's my cat?
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by DjZonk on Oct 10, 2014 8:44:12 GMT -5
WM15 and 14 were unblurred but I haven't watched anything else.
|
|
Boo!
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,417
|
Post by Boo! on Oct 10, 2014 19:20:01 GMT -5
I find it depends how much I drink before I watch them
|
|
TheDieselTrain
Fry's dog Seymour
Chicks Dig Hootie.
Is Stone Cold gonna have to smack a bitch?? WHAT!!!?????
Posts: 23,724
|
Post by TheDieselTrain on Oct 10, 2014 19:54:10 GMT -5
I watched WM15 about a week ago and surprisingly they left Bossman getting hung from the HIAC in.
|
|
4TheGlory
Vegeta
The Fun One At Parties
Posts: 9,749
|
Post by 4TheGlory on Oct 10, 2014 20:45:41 GMT -5
I look back at the fact I bought the entire Wrestlemania box set years ago and spent a fortune on the thing and it was totally blurred and butchered to hell. It really puts over how good of a deal the WWE Network really is. Clean, HD, on demand every PPV, no blur bullshit. Hell even some of the themes have been restored.
|
|
adamclark52
El Dandy
I'm one with the Force; the Force is with me
Posts: 8,139
|
Post by adamclark52 on Oct 10, 2014 20:47:37 GMT -5
I was unaware that they were airing stuff unblurred. That's awesome. Some of those earliest blurred DVD's were BRUTAL. It got better as time went on but damn some of them were bad.
|
|
MiLB Fan
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,394
|
Post by MiLB Fan on Oct 10, 2014 21:00:04 GMT -5
We have the Network to thank for being able to watch classic footage blur-free; PWInsider said that its creation was a big reason why WWE struck a deal with the World Wildlife Fund.
I remember my first time seeing uncensored Attitude Era footage: it was a November '98 Raw on Classics on Demand. I'm still amazed that the Fund agreed to let WWE use its former initials in classic footage. Letting them use the scratch logo again? Sure, I could see that. But hearing "the WWF" in a wrestling context again? Never thought I'd see the day that happened.
|
|
|
Post by OGBoardPoster2005 on Oct 10, 2014 21:16:46 GMT -5
I look back at the fact I bought the entire Wrestlemania box set years ago and spent a fortune on the thing and it was totally blurred and butchered to hell. It really puts over how good of a deal the WWE Network really is. Clean, HD, on demand every PPV, no blur bullshit. Hell even some of the themes have been restored. Same for me. Honestly my DVDs are useless at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Nickybojelais on Oct 13, 2014 18:30:53 GMT -5
I find it depends how much I drink before I watch them Id recommend rather large quantities of liquid refreshments in preparation of watching Wrestlemania 15!
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Oct 13, 2014 18:48:10 GMT -5
We have the Network to thank for being able to watch classic footage blur-free; PWInsider said that its creation was a big reason why WWE struck a deal with the World Wildlife Fund. I remember my first time seeing uncensored Attitude Era footage: it was a November '98 Raw on Classics on Demand. I'm still amazed that the Fund agreed to let WWE use its former initials in classic footage. Letting them use the scratch logo again? Sure, I could see that. But hearing "the WWF" in a wrestling context again? Never thought I'd see the day that happened. As a known, vocal blur hater, I will admit that they got better with them as time went on, but yeah, WWE should have been ashamed of themselves for charging people for that hackjob boxset. I seriously have no idea how people were able to watch WM15-18 from the boxset.
|
|
|
Post by Martin: #TeamBella Treasurer on Oct 13, 2014 19:00:51 GMT -5
I find it depends how much I drink before I watch them Id recommend rather large quantities of liquid refreshments in preparation of watching Wrestlemania 15! I would normally agree, but WM15 was the first WWF video I remember buying (well my folks buying I was 9) so I think I have a sick appreciation for it haha We have the Network to thank for being able to watch classic footage blur-free; PWInsider said that its creation was a big reason why WWE struck a deal with the World Wildlife Fund. I remember my first time seeing uncensored Attitude Era footage: it was a November '98 Raw on Classics on Demand. I'm still amazed that the Fund agreed to let WWE use its former initials in classic footage. Letting them use the scratch logo again? Sure, I could see that. But hearing "the WWF" in a wrestling context again? Never thought I'd see the day that happened. As a known, vocal blur hater, I will admit that they got better with them as time went on, but yeah, WWE should have been ashamed of themselves for charging people for that hackjob boxset. I seriously have no idea how people were able to watch WM15-18 from the boxset. Yeah, I got used to the turnbuckle blur but the on screen graphics and WM17 with the blurring on the blue ring apron was just painful. I sold my Attitude Mania Anthology when the Tagged Classics DVDs of those events went on sale.
|
|
Zach
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 368
|
Post by Zach on Oct 14, 2014 6:52:40 GMT -5
the blurring on everything stopped years ago, even on the DVD's. There was also a weird thing going on for a while where they would mute out whenever someone said WWF, the worst one is the Self Destruction of Ultimate Warrior DVD.
|
|