Rock/Bryan/Ambrose v HHH/Rollins/Orton at WM? (Hypothetical)
Oct 11, 2014 10:55:42 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Oct 11, 2014 10:55:42 GMT -5
I actually brought this possible WrestleMania match up in another thread and was actually surprised to get a decent number of likes for it, so I'll put it in it's own thread for some more specific feedback/critique.
Now, WWE seems to have their hearts set on Brock Lesnar v Roman Reigns for the world title at WrestleMania. We know that much. But where does that leave guys like Daniel Bryan and Dean Ambrose, who would also be worthy challengers (possibly moreso than Reigns)?
Well, given that they teased a possible WM match between The Rock and Triple H on SmackDown, I think that, should it come to be, it should not be a singles match... but a 6 man tag team match (playa). The People's Champions, represented by The Rock, Daniel Bryan and Dean Ambrose against The Authority, represented by Triple H, Seth Rollins and Randy Orton.
Face it, for every one person that's psyched about possibly revisiting a great feud from the Attitude Era, there's one person pissed about... possibly revisiting a great feud from the Attitude Era. I think this would be a great compromise not just for that situation by putting in three top younger talents (and Orton), but also for the fact that Bryan and Ambrose wouldn't be in the title match, since now they'd be in a highly featured match anyway. Also, this could help Rock's recent stamina issues, allowing him to keep his involvement to shorter bursts as opposed to going 20 minutes plus on his own.
Of course, there are issues. At this point, Bryan's and Ambrose's feuds with The Authority would have lasted 20 months and 9 months respectively, so people could easily be over that by then.
So... holla? Or no holla? Good people of FAN, over to you.
Now, WWE seems to have their hearts set on Brock Lesnar v Roman Reigns for the world title at WrestleMania. We know that much. But where does that leave guys like Daniel Bryan and Dean Ambrose, who would also be worthy challengers (possibly moreso than Reigns)?
Well, given that they teased a possible WM match between The Rock and Triple H on SmackDown, I think that, should it come to be, it should not be a singles match... but a 6 man tag team match (playa). The People's Champions, represented by The Rock, Daniel Bryan and Dean Ambrose against The Authority, represented by Triple H, Seth Rollins and Randy Orton.
Face it, for every one person that's psyched about possibly revisiting a great feud from the Attitude Era, there's one person pissed about... possibly revisiting a great feud from the Attitude Era. I think this would be a great compromise not just for that situation by putting in three top younger talents (and Orton), but also for the fact that Bryan and Ambrose wouldn't be in the title match, since now they'd be in a highly featured match anyway. Also, this could help Rock's recent stamina issues, allowing him to keep his involvement to shorter bursts as opposed to going 20 minutes plus on his own.
Of course, there are issues. At this point, Bryan's and Ambrose's feuds with The Authority would have lasted 20 months and 9 months respectively, so people could easily be over that by then.
So... holla? Or no holla? Good people of FAN, over to you.
