TWERKIN' MAGGLE
Crow T. Robot
Black Lives Matter
Posts: 45,732 
Member is Online
|
Post by TWERKIN' MAGGLE on Jan 4, 2016 23:48:09 GMT -5
What other matches will there be?
My guesses:
Becky vs Charlotte after shenanigans on Thursday.
Ambrose vs Owens
New Day vs Lucha Dragons?
I dunno what else. ADR vs ?
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jan 4, 2016 23:49:57 GMT -5
Anyone who isn't going to be in the Rumble should have a match in the undercard or the pre-show. If Ambrose, Owens, Del Rio, New Day, etc. are going to be used to fill out the Rumble, they shouldn't have matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThankGodForSidJustice on Jan 5, 2016 0:10:45 GMT -5
Anyone who isn't going to be in the Rumble should have a match in the undercard or the pre-show. If Ambrose, Owens, Del Rio, New Day, etc. are going to be used to fill out the Rumble, they shouldn't have matches. Well they have to fill the card out somehow. They're not going have job guys like Fandango or Adam Rose in regular matches on the main show, sorry it's not happening. You also need Ambrose, Owens, Del Rio etc. in the Rumble for star power especially with it being for the title now , but at the same time you need them in undercard matches too to fill out the card. If not then really all you can have is a divas match, a tag title match, and the Rumble itself which wouldn't be enough to fill three hours. I don't really like guys double dipping either but they kind of have too with the lack of depth. Also from a kayfabe standpoint in a match where the WWE title is on the line or a WWE title shot at WrestleMania is on the line, the top thirty wrestlers SHOULD be in it regardless if they were in another match earlier. It wouldn't be fair to them if they got left out just because they had to wrestle another match. |
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jan 5, 2016 0:19:59 GMT -5
Anyone who isn't going to be in the Rumble should have a match in the undercard or the pre-show. If Ambrose, Owens, Del Rio, New Day, etc. are going to be used to fill out the Rumble, they shouldn't have matches. Well they have to fill the card out somehow. They're not going have job guys like Fandango or Adam Rose in regular matches on the main show, sorry it's not happening. You also need Ambrose, Owens, Del Rio etc. in the Rumble for star power especially with it being for the title now , but at the same time you need them in undercard matches too to fill out the card. If not then really all you can have is a divas match, a tag title match, and the Rumble itself which wouldn't be enough to fill three hours. I don't really like guys double dipping either but they kind of have too with the lack of depth. Also from a kayfabe standpoint in a match where the WWE title is on the line or a WWE title shot at WrestleMania is on the line, the top thirty wrestlers SHOULD be in it regardless if they were in another match earlier. It wouldn't be fair to them if they got left out just because they had to wrestle another match. Yes, the top thirty wrestlers SHOULD be in the Rumble competing for the WWE Title. BUT Ambrose doesn't need to defend the IC Title if he's going to be in the Rumble. Competing for the WWE Championship or for a WWE Title show should take priority over the mid card champions defending their belts. I didn't say that someone like Owens shouldn't be in the Rumble. But if it's important for himto be in the Rumble, then he shouldn't have a match. Hell, if it's so important to have Kofi in the Rumble so that there can be a "Kofi spot", then I wouldn't have New Day defend the tag belts either, Or I would at least have Big E and Xavier defending the belts. And also with the lack of depth, EVERY wrestler who is healthy and ready to go should be on this card. They could at least have people earn/lose a spot in the Rumble rather than having people left off the show entirely for no reason other than being "too low in the pecking order". |
|
|
|
Post by Hobby Drifter on Jan 5, 2016 0:45:07 GMT -5
Three-hour Royal Rumble. Vince just keeps sending out more guys and eventually the same guys with space Lucha masks and Groucho Marx glasses until somebody FINALLY tosses Roman.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,069
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jan 5, 2016 0:53:16 GMT -5
Three-hour Royal Rumble. Vince just keeps sending out more guys and eventually the same guys with space Lucha masks and Groucho Marx glasses until somebody FINALLY tosses Roman. I know that's probably supposed to say "spare", but I'd be for El Marciano, the wrestling martian. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2016 0:53:53 GMT -5
Ambrose/Owens is SD this week, again, so I don't even know why they'd do it again at the Rumble. This is officially the second time he's defended the belt against him so hopefully that's it but we'll see. I mean they could do it again but defending it three times against one guy is too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jan 5, 2016 0:56:22 GMT -5
Ambrose/Owens is SD this week, again, so I don't even know why they'd do it again at the Rumble. This is officially the second time he's defended the belt against him so hopefully that's it but we'll see. I mean they could do it again but defending it three times against one guy is too much. Yeah, I don't wanna see this match at the Rumble. I'm hoping that the reason they're doing Ambrose/Owens on SD is so that the two of them can blow off their feud and put their full focus on the Rumble match. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2016 1:04:04 GMT -5
Ambrose/Owens is SD this week, again, so I don't even know why they'd do it again at the Rumble. This is officially the second time he's defended the belt against him so hopefully that's it but we'll see. I mean they could do it again but defending it three times against one guy is too much. Yeah, I don't wanna see this match at the Rumble. I'm hoping that the reason they're doing Ambrose/Owens on SD is so that the two of them can blow off their feud and put their full focus on the Rumble match. That's what I hope too and then the Rumble match can set up their WM feuds. |
|
schma
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,740
Member is Online
|
Post by schma on Jan 5, 2016 3:09:41 GMT -5
Doesn't the rumble usually only have two matches other than the rumble on the show proper? Usually one is the WWE title but since that's in the rumble it might be something else. They could do a random Lesnar match and a divas title match. Or maybe for once the divas could get the time and freedom to do an nxt style women's match.
|
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jan 5, 2016 3:11:50 GMT -5
Doesn't the rumble usually only have two matches other than the rumble on the show proper? Usually one is the WWE title but since that's in the rumble it might be something else. They could do a random Lesnar match and a divas title match. Or maybe for once the divas could get the time and freedom to do an nxt style women's match. Yeah. Why not do two Divas matches? |
|
|
|
Post by Drillbit Taylor on Jan 5, 2016 3:38:52 GMT -5
Three-hour Royal Rumble. Vince just keeps sending out more guys and eventually the same guys with space Lucha masks and Groucho Marx glasses until somebody FINALLY tosses Roman. JBL- And at #84 its........whats that.... Mr Axel Machine.Who the hell is ...look at him go maggle. |
|
