|
Post by Instant Classic on Jan 5, 2016 16:28:18 GMT -5
Now that Triple H seems to be facing Roman and Lesnar just faced Cena and Taker. They need to sellout the arena and this is honestly the biggest match they could do. Hell, throw Austin in there as the ref.
|
|
MrBRulzOK
Wade Wilson
Mr No-Pants Heathen
Something Witty Here.
Posts: 26,719
|
Post by MrBRulzOK on Jan 5, 2016 16:34:04 GMT -5
Rock can't wrestle until that insurance thing has been resolved. If they thought he was going to be able to wrestle then they would've told people as soon as possible. Instead right now it's just him making an appearance at Wrestlemania.
|
|
RedDevil
Don Corleone
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 1,692
Member is Online
|
Post by RedDevil on Jan 5, 2016 16:44:06 GMT -5
I've never understood the interest in putting on this match at Mania - I know they had that match at SummerSlam when Rock was leaving, but otherwise I don't see much issue in terms of history. Is Rock vs. Brock really going to attract enough external attention to justify the move? More so than Brock wrestling anyone at all, or Rock for that matter? Is there money on the table for them to work together at Mania?
I'd honestly think they'd be better placed booking something like Brock vs. Ambrose and hyping the hell out of Ambrose between now and Mania. Might not get much extra casual notice, but would damn sure give a more interesting programme, better match and potentially a new star they can actually use on their regular programming. I know it won't happen, I'm just wasting my life writing things like this...
|
|
|
Post by Ruthless Pessimism on Jan 5, 2016 18:30:42 GMT -5
I've never understood the interest in putting on this match at Mania - I know they had that match at SummerSlam when Rock was leaving, but otherwise I don't see much issue in terms of history. Is Rock vs. Brock really going to attract enough external attention to justify the move? More so than Brock wrestling anyone at all, or Rock for that matter? Is there money on the table for them to work together at Mania? I'd honestly think they'd be better placed booking something like Brock vs. Ambrose and hyping the hell out of Ambrose between now and Mania. Might not get much extra casual notice, but would damn sure give a more interesting programme, better match and potentially a new star they can actually use on their regular programming. I know it won't happen, I'm just wasting my life writing things like this... That's the reason it's a good move. Mania is about that casual money. The Rock is one of the biggest names in entertainment and Brock is easily the most legit badass in wrestling. Them having slight history together is all the storyline they need, especially with Heyman and Rock on the mic to sell it. This match would make big money easily, so it's worth it from a business standpoint.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 5, 2016 18:34:11 GMT -5
Rock can't wrestle until that insurance thing has been resolved. If they thought he was going to be able to wrestle then they would've told people as soon as possible. Instead right now it's just him making an appearance at Wrestlemania. Yeah. SAG is going to make his competing again very challenging, especially since he tore his abdomen last time he wrestled. Their priority is that he stays healthy to fulfill his film commitments, and the insurance isn't going to want to cover a guy who is also participating in something as physically strenuous as pro wrestling.
|
|