|
Post by audiencewatching on Dec 18, 2017 14:58:19 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 15:21:07 GMT -5
I know I sound mean, but anybody who wants the violent aspect back of the Attitude Era is an idiot.
Look at TNA, which has been a glorified Attitude Era tribute act for 16 years, and see how that helped.
Besides, you can do more mature storytelling without going to the buckets of blood. Problem is, WWE is incapable of even elementary storytelling without resorting to fart jokes and casual racism.
|
|
mcstoklasa
Hank Scorpio
Sigs/Avatars cannot exceed 1MB
Posts: 6,944
|
Post by mcstoklasa on Dec 18, 2017 15:27:08 GMT -5
Call me sick but I really like to see occasional blood in wrestling
Not unprotected chair shots to the skull though. They can sod off
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 15:31:45 GMT -5
Call me sick but I really like to see occasional blood in wrestling Not unprotected chair shots to the skull though. They can sod off Yeah I wouldn't mind a little blood here and there. Nothing crazy like Eddie at Judgment Day 2004 or anything, but a little color can add to a match. The Usos and New Day showed you can have a brutal match (HIAC) without it though, so it's not a huge deal to me.
|
|
"Magic" Mark Hurr
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Here, have some chili dogs
Not related to Phantasmo
Posts: 15,784
|
Post by "Magic" Mark Hurr on Dec 18, 2017 15:44:30 GMT -5
I've never minded the PG Era if they could tell better stories and produce consistently great angles. The adult content can come from the subtle content that isn't over the top stuff. That's the problem. Their definition of older content comes from them not being able to be smart enough to produce things that cater to the adult who takes there kid if it doesn't include curse words or extreme violence. It's just bad jokes.
|
|
|
Post by thegame415 on Dec 18, 2017 16:35:33 GMT -5
Good thing they didn't go MAC. Imagine Reigns having the iWin.
|
|
|
Post by freeze Austin on Dec 18, 2017 16:38:56 GMT -5
Blood is one thing, but why is it wrong to expect Head? By that, of course I'm talking about Al Snow's mannequin companion, Head. Ratings would soar if at least one talent was allowed to have Head for each show. I remember how I always looked forward to Head every Monday night during the Attitude Era. Al knew what we wanted. What we wanted was Head. The best was when Chyna used Head to put Al Snow flat on his back and down for the count, in what had to be one of the most hardcore scenes ever witnessed in WWE history. Have we gotten so PC that a man can't ask for just a little Head every now and then without being ridiculed?
|
|
thecrusherwi
El Dandy
the Financially Responsible Man
Brawl For All
Posts: 7,659
|
Post by thecrusherwi on Dec 18, 2017 16:43:04 GMT -5
I feel like this debate always misses the point that there is a vast middle ground between the Attitude Era raunch and violence and the completely sterilized company of post 2009. The WWF of 1987-1997 had the perfect amount of rare blood and violence to really drive home a storyline, but those moments were few and far between. Like one blade job every couple of years on TV. But the biggest difference is that the storylines had edge to them, particularly in the main events. The heels did evil things and the faces went to the edge to right wrongs. More aggressive characters and actions can be incorporated to make the show seem more violent without having to spill gallons of blood.
|
|
|
Post by angelofapocalypse on Dec 18, 2017 18:56:39 GMT -5
Attitude era relied too much on flash in the pan with a little to no substance. Like the saying goes..."less is more." And anyone who says the in ring wrestling was good during the time frame is wrong. The wrestling took a back seat for the blood, gore and phony bullshit.
|
|
segaz
Samurai Cop
Posts: 2,381
|
Post by segaz on Dec 18, 2017 19:40:12 GMT -5
He's right. Gimmicks like Saba Simba and Slicks fried chicken just wouldn't fly in today's WWE.
|
|
|
Post by Raw is Doodie101 on Dec 18, 2017 19:49:38 GMT -5
Don’t we see blood in WWE every other year at this point?
|
|
|
Post by Super Duper Dragunov on Dec 18, 2017 20:42:21 GMT -5
"It made me a lot of money by bringing in a target audience I could specifically cater to, call JBL poopy, and make 150 of the same shirt in different colors, oh I mean there's no blood anymore..."
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Attack Tribble on Dec 18, 2017 20:50:04 GMT -5
I know I sound mean, but anybody who wants the violent aspect back of the Attitude Era is an idiot. Look at TNA, which has been a glorified Attitude Era tribute act for 16 years, and see how that helped. Besides, you can do more mature storytelling without going to the buckets of blood. Problem is, WWE is incapable of even elementary storytelling without resorting to fart jokes and casual racism. As I frequently point out to anybody in the anti-PG brigade, it doesn't matter if it's PG or TV-14, bad writing is still bad writing.
|
|
4TheGlory
Vegeta
The Fun One At Parties
Posts: 9,750
|
Post by 4TheGlory on Dec 18, 2017 21:04:45 GMT -5
Current WWE pg is much more tolerable than when they first made the switch and were enforcing it as if it was rated G instead
|
|
Urethra Franklin
King Koopa
When Toronto sports teams lose, Alison Brie is sad
Posts: 11,090
|
Post by Urethra Franklin on Dec 18, 2017 21:34:27 GMT -5
Nobody would be clamouring for the return of the Attitude Era if today’s writing and booking were better.
“Edginess” has nothing to do with the quality of product.
And let’s not forget what actual competition meant for the wrestling industry. The WWF/E and WCW were constantly trying to one-up the other. That impetus doesn’t exist for the WWE today.
|
|
Mochi Lone Wolf
Fry's dog Seymour
Development through Destruction.
Posts: 24,038
|
Post by Mochi Lone Wolf on Dec 18, 2017 21:39:44 GMT -5
The best example I've heard is the difference between Batman:The Animated and the Spawn cartoon. One is more "PG" than the other, but which one was the better show? Most people would say BTAS. Myself included. It's not about the rating. It's NEVER been about the rating to anyone who truly understands how these things work. It's about writing decent stories. Some of the best stories WWF/E have had in their history have happened at times when they weren't "TV-14."
|
|
|
Post by OVO 40 hunched over like he 80 on Dec 18, 2017 22:03:07 GMT -5
On one hand, the unprotected chairshots will never return and I'm ok with that also Vince Russo's bullshit have no place in wrestling anymore.
That being said the PC era will never draw the same business and excitement Austin drew in his peak. I miss the edginess of a true badass talking shit and backing it up, not the bad hokey comedy that raw sometimes is.
Terry Funk once said that wrestling to draw money, it must look like a fight of good against evil. I just don't feel that way anymore. I think I just watch wrestling out of force of habit.
|
|
|
Post by OVO 40 hunched over like he 80 on Dec 18, 2017 22:04:54 GMT -5
The best example I've heard is the difference between Batman:The Animated and the Spawn cartoon. One is more "PG" than the other, but which one was the better show? Most people would say BTAS. Myself included. It's not about the rating. It's NEVER been about the rating to anyone who truly understands how these things work. It's about writing decent stories. Some of the best stories WWF/E have had in their history have happened at times when they weren't "TV-14." Well also comparing Paul Dini to Todd McFarlane as writers would be like comparing ice cream to cow manure.
|
|
|
Post by Toilet Paper Roll on Dec 18, 2017 22:13:10 GMT -5
Theres some aspects of the Attitude Era that would serve the WWE well today. I'd like at the very least to hear wrestlers talk like adults, act like they're not slow and incapable of non scripted mic spots and try to "look cool". THe product tries to appeal to both kids and adults by being kid and family friendly, but they can make it more appealing to kids by bordering on being edgy.
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Dec 19, 2017 4:56:26 GMT -5
Here’s something people forget about the Attitude Era and the Monday Night Wars in general.
The MNWs lasted just under 6 years. The Attitude Era only lasted 4 years. Austin’s ME run lasted around 3 years.
None of what was going on in that Era was sustainable for a long time. That kind of car crash TV was designed to get the most amount of money in for the shortest amount of time using methods that got a wider audience by capitalising off a zeitgeist.
You can’t have that be the product because things and trends change too rapidly for that to work. You just have to learn to evolve and change and craft something that can work long term and give talent an opprtunity to get over with the skills they have combined by telling good stories leading to entertaining at best matches.
|
|