Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019)

[Sir Woodrow]

Mar 27, 2019 12:52:04 GMT -5 Mighty Attack Tribble said:

I'll be damned, we are getting bowcaster Threepio.

I can reveal exclusively that Prawn guy's name is Shrimponna Bar-Bee and he will voiced by Paul Hogan

[Mighty Attack Tribble]

That's quite a mural.

[Zone Was Wrong]

Mar 27, 2019 18:34:59 GMT -5 thetower52 said:

Mar 27, 2019 17:49:23 GMT -5 The Summer of Muskrat XVII said:

I was well versed in Star Wars before the Special Editions, but totally saw the SE’s in theatre.

Rouge One was kind of unnecessary, but it was a damn good movie and when it was over I at least left the theatre understanding why they felt the need to tell that story.

Solo, I thought was okay and had good moments but afterwards I was actually annoyed because I felt they skipped over much more interesting stories during the movie then the one they decided to tell. Like, pretty much everything in the first 20 minutes would’ve been more interesting to flesh out and explore then what they went with. I’d much rather explore his life leading up to why he became a smuggler then the exact events of how he became one

EDIT: Also, Emilia Clarke just doesn’t work for me in anything but GoT. He wooden acting works there, can’t buy into her anywhere else

I really liked Emilia Clarke actually. I got pretty invested in her Cherichi specially with that ending. I haven’t seen snyrging else she’s been in though so maybe that’s why.

My biggest complaint is they kinda made Han getting the falcon not that big of a deal

If my memory serves, going by the old EU books, Han got the Falcon in a similar fashion to Solo.

I remember getting the THX versions of Star Wars for my birthday as a kid. So many good memories and a giant fanboy. So much so I think I give the prequels and Force Awakens a little more leeway than someone who wants to write reviews should. That said the only film of Star Wars I've outright disliked was Last Jedi. Just wasn't a fan of some of the plot points, thought Finn's side quest was filler, and wasn't a fan of Luke's willingness to kill Kylo when he was willingly to toss his lightsaber away to attempt to redeem his father.

All that said, I'm happy Abrams is back for Episode 9. Felt like he a had a vision of where the sequels were to go that got sidelined by Rian.

[Chiral]

Heading to Celebration tomorrow!!

[Push R Truth]

I still like Star Wars... but they need to earn back some lost faith

[The Captain]

Apr 10, 2019 19:54:20 GMT -5 Mighty Attack Tribble said:

That's quite a mural.

That's a neat mural. Love that they have Clone Wars and Rebels represented along with the movies. Especially seeing characters like Ahsoka, Hera, and Kanan in the more realistic art style of the movie art.

[Mighty Attack Tribble]

Apr 10, 2019 21:35:12 GMT -5 The Captain said:

Apr 10, 2019 19:54:20 GMT -5 Mighty Attack Tribble said:

That's quite a mural.

That's a neat mural. Love that they have Clone Wars and Rebels represented along with the movies. Especially seeing characters like Ahsoka, Hera, and Kanan in the more realistic art style of the movie art.

[Perd]

I’m hearing this may be titled Star Wars: Epispde IX - F*** Rian Johnson.

[The Summer of Muskrat XVII]

Apr 10, 2019 20:21:17 GMT -5 Zone Was Wrong said:

Mar 27, 2019 18:34:59 GMT -5 thetower52 said:

I really liked Emilia Clarke actually. I got pretty invested in her Cherichi specially with that ending. I haven’t seen snyrging else she’s been in though so maybe that’s why.

My biggest complaint is they kinda made Han getting the falcon not that big of a deal

If my memory serves, going by the old EU books, Han got the Falcon in a similar fashion to Solo.

I remember getting the THX versions of Star Wars for my birthday as a kid. So many good memories and a giant fanboy. So much so I think I give the prequels and Force Awakens a little more leeway than someone who wants to write reviews should. That said the only film of Star Wars I've outright disliked was Last Jedi. Just wasn't a fan of some of the plot points, thought Finn's side quest was filler, and wasn't a fan of Luke's willingness to kill Kylo when he was willingly to toss his lightsaber away to attempt to redeem his father.

All that said, I'm happy Abrams is back for Episode 9. Felt like he a had a vision of where the sequels were to go that got sidelined by Rian.

Like wasn’t willing to kill Kylo. He hesitated, couldn’t follow through, and unintentionally ended up being the tipping point for Ben going full Dark Side and got a lot of people killed, hence the self imposed exile. He let himself fall into the same bullshit that the Jedi did leading up to the Clone Wars, thinking the Jedi were infallible and had the right to be judge, jury, executioner.

Why does everyone act like Luke was slaughtering children in their sleep? He saw a vision of the evil Ben might cause, and had a “Could you kill baby Hitler?” moment. He went in there to kill Ben to prevent mass killings and evil, realised he couldn’t do it, and ended up being the catalyst that pushed Ben over the edge. It’s kind of a running theme through Star Wars that the Jedi as a whole, as a religion if you will, generally tend to seriously f*** shit up in the name of preserving peace. Their idealistic black or white, good or evil view on the galaxy never works out to their intention.


The Rose/Finn sideplot was pretty lame tho, that one I will 100% concede. And killing Finn in some heroic sacrifice would’ve been the right way to go, Finn is a completely superfluous character. He serves 0 purpose really.

[Zone Was Wrong]

Apr 11, 2019 7:26:58 GMT -5 The Summer of Muskrat XVII said:

Apr 10, 2019 20:21:17 GMT -5 Zone Was Wrong said:

If my memory serves, going by the old EU books, Han got the Falcon in a similar fashion to Solo.

I remember getting the THX versions of Star Wars for my birthday as a kid. So many good memories and a giant fanboy. So much so I think I give the prequels and Force Awakens a little more leeway than someone who wants to write reviews should. That said the only film of Star Wars I've outright disliked was Last Jedi. Just wasn't a fan of some of the plot points, thought Finn's side quest was filler, and wasn't a fan of Luke's willingness to kill Kylo when he was willingly to toss his lightsaber away to attempt to redeem his father.

All that said, I'm happy Abrams is back for Episode 9. Felt like he a had a vision of where the sequels were to go that got sidelined by Rian.

Like wasn’t willing to kill Kylo. He hesitated, couldn’t follow through, and unintentionally ended up being the tipping point for Ben going full Dark Side and got a lot of people killed, hence the self imposed exile. He let himself fall into the same bullshit that the Jedi did leading up to the Clone Wars, thinking the Jedi were infallible and had the right to be judge, jury, executioner.

Why does everyone act like Luke was slaughtering children in their sleep? He saw a vision of the evil Ben might cause, and had a “Could you kill baby Hitler?” moment. He went in there to kill Ben to prevent mass killings and evil, realised he couldn’t do it, and ended up being the catalyst that pushed Ben over the edge. It’s kind of a running theme through Star Wars that the Jedi as a whole, as a religion if you will, generally tend to seriously f*** shit up in the name of preserving peace. Their idealistic black or white, good or evil view on the galaxy never works out to their intention.


The Rose/Finn sideplot was pretty lame tho, that one I will 100% concede. And killing Finn in some heroic sacrifice would’ve been the right way to go, Finn is a completely superfluous character. He serves 0 purpose really.

agree to disagree on the Luke part. Yeah he hesitated but the fact he was willing to go in there with the intent to kill him felt out of character to me. I guess rely on the old EU continuity sometimes. He had the same choice in the Legacy of the Force series, the choice to kill his now Sith nephew, and refuses to lift his hand to duel him. Plus it wasn't like Vader was a pacifist either. If Vader had struck Luke down or let the Emperor do it, they would've gone on the massacre a Rebel force and countless others. Same choice there, strike down someone who might go on to kill others or make the choice that his love was enough to redeem him. Just seems to me Luke's first instinct after decades removed from that moment would be to try and redeem Ben before had fully fell. I can see the other side of it, we never know how we'd react if given the 'kill baby Hitler' option.

[The Summer of Muskrat XVII]

Apr 11, 2019 8:26:54 GMT -5 Zone Was Wrong said:

Apr 11, 2019 7:26:58 GMT -5 The Summer of Muskrat XVII said:

Like wasn’t willing to kill Kylo. He hesitated, couldn’t follow through, and unintentionally ended up being the tipping point for Ben going full Dark Side and got a lot of people killed, hence the self imposed exile. He let himself fall into the same bullshit that the Jedi did leading up to the Clone Wars, thinking the Jedi were infallible and had the right to be judge, jury, executioner.

Why does everyone act like Luke was slaughtering children in their sleep? He saw a vision of the evil Ben might cause, and had a “Could you kill baby Hitler?” moment. He went in there to kill Ben to prevent mass killings and evil, realised he couldn’t do it, and ended up being the catalyst that pushed Ben over the edge. It’s kind of a running theme through Star Wars that the Jedi as a whole, as a religion if you will, generally tend to seriously f*** shit up in the name of preserving peace. Their idealistic black or white, good or evil view on the galaxy never works out to their intention.


The Rose/Finn sideplot was pretty lame tho, that one I will 100% concede. And killing Finn in some heroic sacrifice would’ve been the right way to go, Finn is a completely superfluous character. He serves 0 purpose really.

agree to disagree on the Luke part. Yeah he hesitated but the fact he was willing to go in there with the intent to kill him felt out of character to me. I guess rely on the old EU continuity sometimes. He had the same choice in the Legacy of the Force series, the choice to kill his now Sith nephew, and refuses to lift his hand to duel him. Plus it wasn't like Vader was a pacifist either. If Vader had struck Luke down or let the Emperor do it, they would've gone on the massacre a Rebel force and countless others. Same choice there, strike down someone who might go on to kill others or make the choice that his love was enough to redeem him. Just seems to me Luke's first instinct after decades removed from that moment would be to try and redeem Ben before had fully fell. I can see the other side of it, we never know how we'd react if given the 'kill baby Hitler' option.

And I will admit my knowledge of the EU was never the greatest, only read the Thrawn Trilogy, Shadows of the Empire, and a handful of other books like the Tales From series, and it’s gotten really bad now so I can’t really comment from that perspective. Mine is strictly based off the accepted Disney timeline, and I personally didn’t feel that was completely out of character. Especially if he went full bore into Jedi learning, because killing Ben in his sleep is absolutely something I could see Mace Windu, Ki Adi Mundi, or about 99% of the Jedi we’ve seen so if they felt it would prevent the Empire or First Order. The prequels and Clone Wars really hammered home the point that Jedi are awful, and most of them are foolish, terrible people. The galaxy basically decided that a group of religious extremists with magic powers and laser swords should be the galactic police force.

This conversation is actually making me love Star Wars less. Saying this stuff out loud really makes me take notice of how f***ed the Jedi are, and I think a part of my childhood just died. Nope, I get it now. I literally just started to get why people hated Last Jedi.

[YAKMAN is ICHIBAN]

Apr 11, 2019 8:26:54 GMT -5 Zone Was Wrong said:

Apr 11, 2019 7:26:58 GMT -5 The Summer of Muskrat XVII said:

Like wasn’t willing to kill Kylo. He hesitated, couldn’t follow through, and unintentionally ended up being the tipping point for Ben going full Dark Side and got a lot of people killed, hence the self imposed exile. He let himself fall into the same bullshit that the Jedi did leading up to the Clone Wars, thinking the Jedi were infallible and had the right to be judge, jury, executioner.

Why does everyone act like Luke was slaughtering children in their sleep? He saw a vision of the evil Ben might cause, and had a “Could you kill baby Hitler?” moment. He went in there to kill Ben to prevent mass killings and evil, realised he couldn’t do it, and ended up being the catalyst that pushed Ben over the edge. It’s kind of a running theme through Star Wars that the Jedi as a whole, as a religion if you will, generally tend to seriously f*** shit up in the name of preserving peace. Their idealistic black or white, good or evil view on the galaxy never works out to their intention.


The Rose/Finn sideplot was pretty lame tho, that one I will 100% concede. And killing Finn in some heroic sacrifice would’ve been the right way to go, Finn is a completely superfluous character. He serves 0 purpose really.

agree to disagree on the Luke part. Yeah he hesitated but the fact he was willing to go in there with the intent to kill him felt out of character to me. I guess rely on the old EU continuity sometimes. He had the same choice in the Legacy of the Force series, the choice to kill his now Sith nephew, and refuses to lift his hand to duel him. Plus it wasn't like Vader was a pacifist either. If Vader had struck Luke down or let the Emperor do it, they would've gone on the massacre a Rebel force and countless others. Same choice there, strike down someone who might go on to kill others or make the choice that his love was enough to redeem him. Just seems to me Luke's first instinct after decades removed from that moment would be to try and redeem Ben before had fully fell. I can see the other side of it, we never know how we'd react if given the 'kill baby Hitler' option.

Yeah, I don't know who that f***ing guy was but it wasn't my Luke Skywalker.

Star Wars is back! And all your favorite heroes are old miserable failures!

[xCompackx]

I still think Phasma is alive. That’s all I have to say.

[YAKMAN is ICHIBAN]

Apr 11, 2019 12:01:34 GMT -5 xCompackx said:

I still think Phasma is alive. That’s all I have to say.

She's like the Kenny of the new Star Wars movies.

[Hit Girl]

They devoted shitloads of screentime to Holdo and Rose, two useless female characters in TLJ, but killed off Phasma, the female character that had the most potential for development. What they should have done in TFA is just merge Hux and Phasma as a single character, and let Gwendoline Christie play her as a more serious Tarkin-like First Order leader, as a contrast to the temperamental Kylo Ren.

[YAKMAN is ICHIBAN]

Apr 11, 2019 12:53:35 GMT -5 Hit Girl said:

They devoted shitloads of screentime to Holdo and Rose, two useless female characters in TLJ, but killed off Phasma, the female character that had the most potential for development. What they should have done in TFA is just merge Hux and Phasma as a single character, and let Gwendoline Christie play her as a more serious Tarkin-like First Order leader, as a contrast to the temperamental Kylo Ren.

That sounds a lot better. Alternatively, have her move up in rank and lose or change her armor for the second movie.

I've rarely seen suggestions that sound worse than what we got.

[Mighty Attack Tribble]

Writer Bryan Young has probably the best take on Luke in the sequels for my money.

Rewatch The Empire Strikes Back and I think it's apparent that there was no other choice for Luke Skywalker in The Last Jedi, given the events of The Force Awakens.

The entire premise of The Empire Strikes Back is that Luke Skywalker can sense Han and Leia in danger before it happens across the galaxy and drops everything to save them.

Which makes the biggest question in The Force Awakens, to me, "Why didn't Luke save Han?"

Not Snoke, not Rey's parents, nothing. Why did Luke Skywalker let Han Solo die?

Luke is the central mystery of The Force Awakens. The opening sentence of the crawl is "Luke Skywalker has vanished." The closing shot is Rey having found him. The film is begging us to ask these questions about Luke.

Why are we getting sidetracked by Snoke and Rey's parents?

Because of Empire and The Force Awakens, I don't think Rian Johnson COULD have done anything else with Luke Skywalker and have it make sense. There were slight variations that could have been made, sure, but the broad strokes of what Johnson gave us are pretty much inevitable.

I expected Luke to toss the saber the first time I saw the film. That's his thing. I've been on the "Luke is turning to non-violence" bandwagon for a while. But I was furious the first time I heard him say, "Where's Han?" BUT! I realized there had to be a reason for it...

My patience paid off in what I find one of the most heartfelt and stunning moments in the film: when Rey realizes that Luke has cut himself off from the Force.

Here we have the single most powerful Force user in the galaxy forced to cut himself off of every instinct he has for fear he'll do the galaxy more harm than good. From Luke's perspective, this abstinence of the Force is heroic. Another Jedi purge becomes impossible.

The perspective of the audience hasn't been as sympathetic. But this is also one of the central themes of The Last Jedi: that we can all perceive the exact same thing in a different way.

I'm not just talking about the Rashomon sequence (which I thought was brilliant filmmaking), but the vision Rey and Kylo shared and discussed on the elevator. They saw the same thing and came to different conclusions about what that outcome would be.

"Always in motion is the future," Master Yoda would say.

But let's talk about the Rashomon sequence. Because, to me, this is what made Luke the LEAST Luke and the MOST Luke and the more I watch it, the more heartbreaking it is to me in the best ways.

In case anyone is unfamiliar, Rashomon is a groundbreaking 1950 samurai film by Akira Kurosawa, who has always been an intense influence on Star Wars.

It tells the tale of a murder in a meadow from three different perspectives. The film never offers us an objective truth on what happened, merely lets the narrators be as reliable or unreliable as our point of view allows.

Our first glimpse of the "Rashomon" triptych in The Last Jedi comes when Luke explains that he'd sensed the Dark Side in Ben. He went to confront him about it and it didn't go well. No sabers were in play. This is how Luke WISHES it would have gone, if at all.

The second version is from Ben's perspective. Naturally, he's the hero of this version. Luke practically has Sith eyes and his green lightsaber is almost a sickly yellow. From Ben's POV, Luke arrives to murder him absolutely. There is no question in his mind.

And then, the third time, we're given Luke's version. A blend of the two with plenty of shades of gray. And, for my money, the version of the story I believe. And it's the one I think truest to Luke's character, too.

Luke goes to check on Ben and the darkness growing inside him. This wellness check is already filled with self-doubt. Luke, like every creative or heroic person I've ever known, suffers from impostor syndrome. Just like Obi-Wan's.

And here he sees a darkness greater than anything he could have ever imagined. And a future where all of his loved ones are killed and the Jedi order he cared about burned to the ground. What happened the last time he was confronted with an image of this?

The last time this happened, he was in the Death Star Throne Room and Vader taunted him with this vision of the future and he lost control. He ignited his saber out of instinct and fought. With rage and anger.

But he pulled himself back from doing the thing he swore he wouldn't do: kill his own father. Then he tosses his lightsaber and says, essentially, "kill me if you have to, but I'll die like a Jedi."

Now, he goes to Ben's hut and sees that future all over again. And, as before, his saber ignites. And this is startling to him. He's instantly ashamed of himself and must deal with the consequence of that split-second consideration. We know he'd NEVER kill his nephew. Ben doesn't.

Some have said that Luke wouldn't consider this again, but facing the Dark side of yourself isn't a "one time and it's over thing." It's a constant. We learn and we grow and we constantly have to reevaluate that.

And here's where Luke decided it was ultimately the right thing for the Galaxy to end the Jedi and quit the Force. Because these cycles of violence will happen between good and evil jockeying for power. And the constant in Luke's view was the Jedi.

Their failure. Hypocrisy. Hubris.

If they were off the playing field, there would be no Vader. Or Kylo Ren. So instead of doubling down and training NEW Jedi to take down his nephew, he simply ends the cycle.

VIolence begets violence and Luke would no longer participate.

And that's why I love the end of the movie. Luke finally learned from his mistakes. He could stick to his non-violence, but still set an example that would ignite the galaxy. Which is why his saber never touches Ben's during the fight. It's 100% evasion.

He had lost the understanding of the value of the Legend of Luke Skywalker, but Rey helped him find it again. And he could once again believe in himself. And the Jedi.

From my perspective, given Luke's inaction in TFA, this is the ONLY thing that could have been done with him. And why I've embraced the arc so much. I love it.

You don't have to like it, but this thread is the Luke I saw up there. And when he has his heroic moment on Crait and binary sunset... It's a perfect capstone to his character, given the turn the universe and canon took.

[Hit Girl]

Apr 11, 2019 14:32:47 GMT -5 Mighty Attack Tribble said:

Writer Bryan Young has probably the best take on Luke in the sequels for my money.

Rewatch The Empire Strikes Back and I think it's apparent that there was no other choice for Luke Skywalker in The Last Jedi, given the events of The Force Awakens.

The entire premise of The Empire Strikes Back is that Luke Skywalker can sense Han and Leia in danger before it happens across the galaxy and drops everything to save them.

Which makes the biggest question in The Force Awakens, to me, "Why didn't Luke save Han?"

Not Snoke, not Rey's parents, nothing. Why did Luke Skywalker let Han Solo die?

Luke is the central mystery of The Force Awakens. The opening sentence of the crawl is "Luke Skywalker has vanished." The closing shot is Rey having found him. The film is begging us to ask these questions about Luke.

Why are we getting sidetracked by Snoke and Rey's parents?

Because of Empire and The Force Awakens, I don't think Rian Johnson COULD have done anything else with Luke Skywalker and have it make sense. There were slight variations that could have been made, sure, but the broad strokes of what Johnson gave us are pretty much inevitable.

I expected Luke to toss the saber the first time I saw the film. That's his thing. I've been on the "Luke is turning to non-violence" bandwagon for a while. But I was furious the first time I heard him say, "Where's Han?" BUT! I realized there had to be a reason for it...

My patience paid off in what I find one of the most heartfelt and stunning moments in the film: when Rey realizes that Luke has cut himself off from the Force.

Here we have the single most powerful Force user in the galaxy forced to cut himself off of every instinct he has for fear he'll do the galaxy more harm than good. From Luke's perspective, this abstinence of the Force is heroic. Another Jedi purge becomes impossible.

The perspective of the audience hasn't been as sympathetic. But this is also one of the central themes of The Last Jedi: that we can all perceive the exact same thing in a different way.

I'm not just talking about the Rashomon sequence (which I thought was brilliant filmmaking), but the vision Rey and Kylo shared and discussed on the elevator. They saw the same thing and came to different conclusions about what that outcome would be.

"Always in motion is the future," Master Yoda would say.

But let's talk about the Rashomon sequence. Because, to me, this is what made Luke the LEAST Luke and the MOST Luke and the more I watch it, the more heartbreaking it is to me in the best ways.

In case anyone is unfamiliar, Rashomon is a groundbreaking 1950 samurai film by Akira Kurosawa, who has always been an intense influence on Star Wars.

It tells the tale of a murder in a meadow from three different perspectives. The film never offers us an objective truth on what happened, merely lets the narrators be as reliable or unreliable as our point of view allows.

Our first glimpse of the "Rashomon" triptych in The Last Jedi comes when Luke explains that he'd sensed the Dark Side in Ben. He went to confront him about it and it didn't go well. No sabers were in play. This is how Luke WISHES it would have gone, if at all.

The second version is from Ben's perspective. Naturally, he's the hero of this version. Luke practically has Sith eyes and his green lightsaber is almost a sickly yellow. From Ben's POV, Luke arrives to murder him absolutely. There is no question in his mind.

And then, the third time, we're given Luke's version. A blend of the two with plenty of shades of gray. And, for my money, the version of the story I believe. And it's the one I think truest to Luke's character, too.

Luke goes to check on Ben and the darkness growing inside him. This wellness check is already filled with self-doubt. Luke, like every creative or heroic person I've ever known, suffers from impostor syndrome. Just like Obi-Wan's.

And here he sees a darkness greater than anything he could have ever imagined. And a future where all of his loved ones are killed and the Jedi order he cared about burned to the ground. What happened the last time he was confronted with an image of this?

The last time this happened, he was in the Death Star Throne Room and Vader taunted him with this vision of the future and he lost control. He ignited his saber out of instinct and fought. With rage and anger.

But he pulled himself back from doing the thing he swore he wouldn't do: kill his own father. Then he tosses his lightsaber and says, essentially, "kill me if you have to, but I'll die like a Jedi."

Now, he goes to Ben's hut and sees that future all over again. And, as before, his saber ignites. And this is startling to him. He's instantly ashamed of himself and must deal with the consequence of that split-second consideration. We know he'd NEVER kill his nephew. Ben doesn't.

Some have said that Luke wouldn't consider this again, but facing the Dark side of yourself isn't a "one time and it's over thing." It's a constant. We learn and we grow and we constantly have to reevaluate that.

And here's where Luke decided it was ultimately the right thing for the Galaxy to end the Jedi and quit the Force. Because these cycles of violence will happen between good and evil jockeying for power. And the constant in Luke's view was the Jedi.

Their failure. Hypocrisy. Hubris.

If they were off the playing field, there would be no Vader. Or Kylo Ren. So instead of doubling down and training NEW Jedi to take down his nephew, he simply ends the cycle.

VIolence begets violence and Luke would no longer participate.

And that's why I love the end of the movie. Luke finally learned from his mistakes. He could stick to his non-violence, but still set an example that would ignite the galaxy. Which is why his saber never touches Ben's during the fight. It's 100% evasion.

He had lost the understanding of the value of the Legend of Luke Skywalker, but Rey helped him find it again. And he could once again believe in himself. And the Jedi.

From my perspective, given Luke's inaction in TFA, this is the ONLY thing that could have been done with him. And why I've embraced the arc so much. I love it.

You don't have to like it, but this thread is the Luke I saw up there. And when he has his heroic moment on Crait and binary sunset... It's a perfect capstone to his character, given the turn the universe and canon took.

He's trying too hard. Luke has been terribly written in the sequels.

[Pooh Carlson]

Apr 10, 2019 21:27:59 GMT -5 Chiral said:

Heading to Celebration tomorrow!!

I'm curious to hear your thoughts on it! I went today and walked through the exhibition floor first. Bought a couple art pieces and checked out the Lego displays at length. Tons of people... tons of walking. I ended up having to park in Parking Garage C, which was like a 30 minute walk from where the actual convention was, with no signs to guide where to actually walk to get to the convention. Had a photo op with Janina Gavankar at 4:10 and was going to go to the official merch shop afterward, but they had closed the line for the day, which is upsetting. I'd seen all I had to see, so I left at that point. Seems like it could've been organized better... more opportunity for official merch, better app, etc. etc.

[Deleted]

So.........we're getting the title and a trailer today, right?