|
|
Post by Stu on Dec 21, 2006 15:02:11 GMT -5
I was having nachoes for dinner last night when I started thinking about a common problem I have. Sometimes I find myself with excess chips, while other times I have extra cheese, salsa, etc. It's certainly easier to eat chips as they are, but it's nice to have the toppings to go with them. The toppings alone, on the other hand, get messy and require a spoon or maybe crackers or something.
Luckily, last night I had a balanced amount of each and a problem was averted. But I'm not always that lucky.
So which is better? More chips or toppings?
|
|
|
|
Post by Drillbit Taylor on Dec 21, 2006 15:27:10 GMT -5
extra Toppings. Like Peppers and Cheese is allwas good. I can just eat the jhalpenions plain if i want
|
|
|
|
Post by Alucard on Dec 21, 2006 15:32:08 GMT -5
Toppings, yo
|
|
The Raven
Hank Scorpio
Where The Raven flies, there's Jeopardy!: Sports Edition
Posts: 5,907 
|
Post by The Raven on Dec 21, 2006 15:34:51 GMT -5
I suppose the topping. Those chips aren't good without something to dip them in.
|
|
Flynnyrd
Bubba Ho-Tep
BANNED racist
Posts: 509
|
Post by Flynnyrd on Dec 21, 2006 16:37:53 GMT -5
I order them without the "e".
|
|
|
|
Post by THE Dinobot on Dec 22, 2006 5:04:57 GMT -5
The only topping I need for natchoes is the cheese crud. Peppers 'n junk aren't my bag.
As far as what I'd take more of, it's the chips. Most of the time the cheese given to I at first is enough, so having extra chippies is always neat.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doctor Tull-eus S. Venture on Dec 22, 2006 8:25:22 GMT -5
If I have nachos, there's got to be chicken on them.
Lots of shredded chicken, cheese, a few diced black olives, tomatoes, and salsa i where it's at.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baixo Astral on Dec 22, 2006 10:04:03 GMT -5
I gots to have sour cream and guacamole.
|
|
