|
|
Post by CeilingFan on Feb 3, 2019 11:47:21 GMT -5
Would Sting's first World Title reign have been any better?
|
|
SmashTV
Dennis Stamp
Big Money, Big Prizes, I Love It!
The Excellence of Allocation
Posts: 4,516 
|
Post by SmashTV on Feb 3, 2019 12:03:33 GMT -5
I think so. He could have had a proper feud with Sid and maybe Windham until mid 1991. Then you can have the Luger turn heel earlier so Sting can feud with him before doing the Abdullah and Cactus Jack/Dangerous Alliance storylines.
All of these feuds make Sting look more credible as he’s taking on a variety of opponents.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2019 13:36:13 GMT -5
I hate angles like that. Why didn't Sting just pay the production crew to tell him who he was?
|
|
|
|
Post by toodarkmark on Feb 3, 2019 15:30:34 GMT -5
Black Scorpion was awful, but it was still Ole Anderson booking and taking orders from Jim Herd. Let Jim Cornette and Paul Heyman book the angle without Herd involved, and it, along with Sting's reign, would have succeded.
Was Flair's next reign successful? Or Luger's? Herd, with Ole and post WWF Dusty buried the promotion. People blaming it on Sting always baffles me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Feb 3, 2019 15:38:18 GMT -5
I mean it would have been less comical and stupid so it would have been better just by default. But I don't think it would have been that much better. Sting was always at his best when he was chasing the title, trying to survive the monster or both. Champion Sting never really worked in the long term.
|
|
