|
|
Post by AJ Smudgico on Dec 31, 2020 12:48:43 GMT -5
It intrigues me. I've been watching a lot of Royal Rumbles on the network recently and thought when I got to 1992 I'd get the order correct and name each wrestler correctly as they entered. Sadly I failed.
So can any of you do it while watching one? If not what's the closest you've done?
|
|
fw91
Patti Mayonnaise
FAN Idol All-Star: FAN Idol Season X and *Gavel* 2x Judges' Throwdown winner
Tribe has spoken for 2024 Mets
Posts: 39,152 
Member is Online
|
Post by fw91 on Dec 31, 2020 12:53:45 GMT -5
2008 cause I was there
|
|
|
|
Post by CeilingFan on Dec 31, 2020 14:25:20 GMT -5
1990, because I have seen it over 100 times.
|
|
msc
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,466
|
Post by msc on Dec 31, 2020 18:08:26 GMT -5
If you aren't putting a timer clock on me for stress, everyone from 1989 to 2010 and most of them after but I falter on 2013 or 2014.
I had a brain issue a decade ago, it went a bit nuts - anyhow, one of the things we did to get me speaking aloud again which had been a bit of an issue was to recite Rumble entries from a randomly selected rumble.
|
|
fw91
Patti Mayonnaise
FAN Idol All-Star: FAN Idol Season X and *Gavel* 2x Judges' Throwdown winner
Tribe has spoken for 2024 Mets
Posts: 39,152
Member is Online
|
Post by fw91 on Dec 31, 2020 20:39:51 GMT -5
Sporcle has games to test your knowledge for each rumble if you want to see how good you are
|
|
|
|
Post by mrpeacock on Dec 31, 2020 23:21:19 GMT -5
I could probably get close with 1994 and 1996. Watched those the most easily.
|
|
J. Hova
Don Corleone
Emotionally exhausted and morally bankrupt
Posts: 2,010
|
Post by J. Hova on Jan 1, 2021 2:34:28 GMT -5
I did somewhat well with 93 until I flipped the Headshrinkers and Natural Disasters, aside from that, I got to the end. That is because it was the first ever PPV my parents ordered for me and I probably watched that (without the express written consent of the WWF) on VHS 50 times.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2021 2:38:12 GMT -5
I think I'd be hardpressed to name more than three or four Rumble first two entries.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,204
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jan 1, 2021 3:32:15 GMT -5
No way I could. I enjoy rumbles, generally speaking, but I have never been good about remembering that sort of thing.
|
|
67 more
King Koopa
He's just a Sexy Kurt
Posts: 11,530
|
Post by 67 more on Jan 1, 2021 3:34:02 GMT -5
I'll have a Rumble 9, a Rumble 9 large...
|
|
Doctor Of Style
King Koopa
Well, first they love me, and then they don't. Sometimes they do it, and sometimes they won't.
Posts: 12,104
|
Post by Doctor Of Style on Jan 1, 2021 7:41:52 GMT -5
Nope. Not even the '92 Rumble that I've watched dozens of times just for Bobby Heenan's commentary.
|
|
|
|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Jan 1, 2021 9:44:09 GMT -5
Not a chance.
If you can then take that ability to the stock market! I don’t know how but being able to name 30 guys in a row in the right order has to involve a skill that would be beneficial to investing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triangle Lancer on Jan 1, 2021 12:15:31 GMT -5
Nope. And I've seen the 1988 & 1997 one many times.
|
|
|
|
Post by I'm Team Bayley and Indi on Jan 3, 2021 13:45:16 GMT -5
I reckon I could only name the first few entrants in any Rumble, some I may struggle even naming the first two entrants
|
|
|
|
Post by jason1980s on Jan 3, 2021 14:02:52 GMT -5
I get American history may be more important than WWE but if someone can name the 45 U.S. Presidents, someone should be able to memorize a rumble order. The number of presidents order is part of Bob Backlund's gimmick so someone may even be able to name the presidents and the rumble order. Considering one is 33 years at the oldest and one is over a hundred two hundred years older I think there's a better chance at the rumble order being named.
|
|
Eunös ✈
Dalek
Duck Feet Expert
Tolerated, just not practically liked.
Posts: 59,210
|
Post by Eunös ✈ on Jan 3, 2021 14:19:36 GMT -5
I probably could have one time... Probably not so much anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Jan 3, 2021 14:50:53 GMT -5
I get American history may be more important than WWE but if someone can name the 45 U.S. Presidents, someone should be able to memorize a rumble order. The number of presidents order is part of Bob Backlund's gimmick so someone may even be able to name the presidents and the rumble order. Considering one is 33 years at the oldest and one is over a hundred two hundred years older I think there's a better chance at the rumble order being named. I don’t think it’s a question of can someone memorize a Rumble order. If they read it and studied the order then sure they could. The odds of just happening to remember the order because you watched the match a lot seems extremely low though. |
|
|
|
Post by AJ Smudgico on Jan 4, 2021 14:57:24 GMT -5
I get American history may be more important than WWE but if someone can name the 45 U.S. Presidents, someone should be able to memorize a rumble order. The number of presidents order is part of Bob Backlund's gimmick so someone may even be able to name the presidents and the rumble order. Considering one is 33 years at the oldest and one is over a hundred two hundred years older I think there's a better chance at the rumble order being named. I don’t think it’s a question of can someone memorize a Rumble order. If they read it and studied the order then sure they could. The odds of just happening to remember the order because you watched the match a lot seems extremely low though. This is basically how I meant it. I thought I'd know 1992 but got it wrong in many places. 1993 I was quite good at but again was only the first handful and others here and there. 1990 is probably the one I did best at |
|
