wankah
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,380
|
Post by wankah on Apr 20, 2024 5:57:54 GMT -5
Or they could just not sign cause they're shit.
|
|
|
Post by daaave on Apr 20, 2024 6:08:18 GMT -5
Or they could just not sign cause they're shit. Well yeah and that. By "a lot of fun with Jinder", I mean one night only
|
|
wankah
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,380
|
Post by wankah on Apr 20, 2024 6:26:46 GMT -5
Or they could just not sign cause they're shit. Well yeah and that. By "a lot of fun with Jinder", I mean one night only "One night with Jinder" sounds marketable.
|
|
Facetious
King Koopa
ADAM COLE BAYBAY
Posts: 11,668
|
Post by Facetious on Apr 21, 2024 18:17:28 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy’s AEW deal is up much sooner than expected.
When Jeff Hardy signed with All Elite Wrestling years ago, we’d reported that it was done in a way that Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy’s deals matched up. However, that is no longer the case. But they’re not far off.
Matt Hardy appeared in TNA on April 20 after allowing his contract to expire, but reiterated that he's a free agent. His deal actually expired in March, but was extended a couple of weeks past WrestleMania weekend.
Originally, it was believed that AEW had extended Jeff Hardy’s deal into 2025 due to injury and sabbatical time. As of late March, that wasn’t the case. At that period, Hardy’s deal was set to expire sometime in the Spring, based on what Jeff Hardy told other talent at recent conventions.
AEW could likely extend the time on the deal.
- Fightful
|
|
|
Post by kingoftheindies on Apr 21, 2024 19:11:26 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy’s AEW deal is up much sooner than expected. When Jeff Hardy signed with All Elite Wrestling years ago, we’d reported that it was done in a way that Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy’s deals matched up. However, that is no longer the case. But they’re not far off. Matt Hardy appeared in TNA on April 20 after allowing his contract to expire, but reiterated that he's a free agent. His deal actually expired in March, but was extended a couple of weeks past WrestleMania weekend. Originally, it was believed that AEW had extended Jeff Hardy’s deal into 2025 due to injury and sabbatical time. As of late March, that wasn’t the case. At that period, Hardy’s deal was set to expire sometime in the Spring, based on what Jeff Hardy told other talent at recent conventions. AEW could likely extend the time on the deal. - Fightful sounds like AEW may just be washing their hands of the Hardys
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Apr 21, 2024 23:05:53 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy’s AEW deal is up much sooner than expected. When Jeff Hardy signed with All Elite Wrestling years ago, we’d reported that it was done in a way that Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy’s deals matched up. However, that is no longer the case. But they’re not far off. Matt Hardy appeared in TNA on April 20 after allowing his contract to expire, but reiterated that he's a free agent. His deal actually expired in March, but was extended a couple of weeks past WrestleMania weekend. Originally, it was believed that AEW had extended Jeff Hardy’s deal into 2025 due to injury and sabbatical time. As of late March, that wasn’t the case. At that period, Hardy’s deal was set to expire sometime in the Spring, based on what Jeff Hardy told other talent at recent conventions. AEW could likely extend the time on the deal. - Fightful sounds like AEW may just be washing their hands of the Hardys It's the correct thing to do on many levels
|
|
|
Post by jean0987654321 on Apr 21, 2024 23:32:31 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy’s AEW deal is up much sooner than expected. When Jeff Hardy signed with All Elite Wrestling years ago, we’d reported that it was done in a way that Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy’s deals matched up. However, that is no longer the case. But they’re not far off. Matt Hardy appeared in TNA on April 20 after allowing his contract to expire, but reiterated that he's a free agent. His deal actually expired in March, but was extended a couple of weeks past WrestleMania weekend. Originally, it was believed that AEW had extended Jeff Hardy’s deal into 2025 due to injury and sabbatical time. As of late March, that wasn’t the case. At that period, Hardy’s deal was set to expire sometime in the Spring, based on what Jeff Hardy told other talent at recent conventions. AEW could likely extend the time on the deal. - Fightful We hope. Let him go. There's no value in keeping him
|
|
|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Apr 22, 2024 0:10:09 GMT -5
I actually thought Jeff was doing some of his best work recently before he got hurt and was curious where his heel turn was going. But also not going to lose sleep over him leaving.
|
|
Facetious
King Koopa
ADAM COLE BAYBAY
Posts: 11,668
|
Post by Facetious on Apr 22, 2024 0:12:59 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy’s AEW deal is up much sooner than expected. When Jeff Hardy signed with All Elite Wrestling years ago, we’d reported that it was done in a way that Matt Hardy and Jeff Hardy’s deals matched up. However, that is no longer the case. But they’re not far off. Matt Hardy appeared in TNA on April 20 after allowing his contract to expire, but reiterated that he's a free agent. His deal actually expired in March, but was extended a couple of weeks past WrestleMania weekend. Originally, it was believed that AEW had extended Jeff Hardy’s deal into 2025 due to injury and sabbatical time. As of late March, that wasn’t the case. At that period, Hardy’s deal was set to expire sometime in the Spring, based on what Jeff Hardy told other talent at recent conventions. AEW could likely extend the time on the deal. - Fightful We hope. Let him go. There's no value in keeping him We got a cool Darby match out of Jeff, but he added more headaches than he was worth. Let him and Matt ham it up in TNA
|
|
Doo Doo
Dalek
Acknowledged by Lexis King on 4/9/24
Posts: 52,303
|
Post by Doo Doo on Apr 22, 2024 1:15:31 GMT -5
I smell an AEW Tag Titles reign for Zak Knight and Xyon Quinn!!!!
|
|
markymark
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,277
|
Post by markymark on Apr 23, 2024 7:55:56 GMT -5
|
|
dbsot
Bubba Ho-Tep
Posts: 597
|
Post by dbsot on Apr 23, 2024 14:13:58 GMT -5
Well, this is certainly significant.
|
|
|
Post by Cyno on Apr 23, 2024 14:23:00 GMT -5
Well, this is certainly significant. I wonder if this will affect WWE's usual contract releases for wrestlers as they aren't technically non-competes so much as a 90 day advanced notice of a release with pay to compensate. Though the way non-competes have been used for f***ing fast food workers of all people is a disgusting abuse. Good riddance to that.
Though existing non-competes for senior executives are exempted from this ruling, so Vince McMahon's hefty non-compete after his fall from grace from TKO is still in effect.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Apr 23, 2024 14:49:30 GMT -5
Well, this is certainly significant. I wonder if this will affect WWE's usual contract releases for wrestlers as they aren't technically non-competes so much as a 90 day advanced notice of a release with pay to compensate. Though the way non-competes have been used for f***ing fast food workers of all people is a disgusting abuse. Good riddance to that.
Though existing non-competes for senior executives are exempted from this ruling, so Vince McMahon's hefty non-compete after his fall from grace from TKO is still in effect.
I haven’t read through the FTC rule completely yet, but you’re right that the 90-day “noncompetes” are not really noncompetes. They are notice periods of when you are being released/terminated.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,850
|
Post by Dub H on Apr 23, 2024 16:22:48 GMT -5
I wonder if this will affect WWE's usual contract releases for wrestlers as they aren't technically non-competes so much as a 90 day advanced notice of a release with pay to compensate. Though the way non-competes have been used for f***ing fast food workers of all people is a disgusting abuse. Good riddance to that.
Though existing non-competes for senior executives are exempted from this ruling, so Vince McMahon's hefty non-compete after his fall from grace from TKO is still in effect.
I haven’t read through the FTC rule completely yet, but you’re right that the 90-day “noncompetes” are not really noncompetes. They are notice periods of when you are being released/terminated. They are non-competes in all but name.
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Apr 23, 2024 16:25:57 GMT -5
I haven’t read through the FTC rule completely yet, but you’re right that the 90-day “noncompetes” are not really noncompetes. They are notice periods of when you are being released/terminated. They are non-competes in all but name. Not really, no because you are paid your normal salary throughout. It may even be seen as a benefit to the worker as there has to be certain “for cause” conditions met for WWE to terminate your contract immediately and without the 90 days notice.
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,850
|
Post by Dub H on Apr 23, 2024 16:28:28 GMT -5
They are non-competes in all but name. Not really, no because you are paid your normal salary throughout. It may even be seen as a benefit to the worker as there has to be certain “for cause” conditions met for WWE to terminate your contract immediately and without the 90 days notice. but it's not their normal salary because they have a minimum guarantee and are paid on a lot of extras that they are denied the chance. And even then ,paid or not it's no compete ,multiple no competes are paid. The only difference is that WWE says you are release ....in 90 days,it's set in stone. Instead of saying you are released now I'm not even sure it's legal to not provide compensation for. No compete clause
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Apr 23, 2024 16:31:48 GMT -5
Not really, no because you are paid your normal salary throughout. It may even be seen as a benefit to the worker as there has to be certain “for cause” conditions met for WWE to terminate your contract immediately and without the 90 days notice. but it's not their normal salary because they have a minimum guarantee and are paid on a lot of extras that they are denied the chance. And even then ,paid or not it's no compete ,multiple no competes are paid. The only difference is that WWE says you are release ....in 90 days,it's set in stone. Instead of saying you are released now WWE contracts now are fully guaranteed, they don’t do the minimum guarantee plus extras anymore (outside of merchandise, which they’d still be paid for).
|
|
Dub H
Crow T. Robot
Captain Pixel: the Game Master
I ❤ Aniki
Posts: 47,850
|
Post by Dub H on Apr 23, 2024 16:34:03 GMT -5
but it's not their normal salary because they have a minimum guarantee and are paid on a lot of extras that they are denied the chance. And even then ,paid or not it's no compete ,multiple no competes are paid. The only difference is that WWE says you are release ....in 90 days,it's set in stone. Instead of saying you are released now WWE contracts now are fully guaranteed, they don’t do the minimum guarantee plus extras anymore (outside of merchandise). That could be a difference, can't say I know enough about us law if that would still count as compensation, but No compete clauses have compensation included. There is also a lot of other legal issues with it , but that is more due to then being considered independent worker and has been debated or years
|
|
|
Post by polarbearpete on Apr 23, 2024 16:40:07 GMT -5
WWE contracts now are fully guaranteed, they don’t do the minimum guarantee plus extras anymore (outside of merchandise). That could be a difference, can't say I know enough about us law if that would still count as compensation, but No compete clauses have compensation included. There is also a lot of other legal issues with it , but that is more due to then being considered independent worker and has been debated or years Non-competes can certainly exist without compensation (or at least they did before this).
|
|