When do you consider AEW’s birth

[Lance Uppercut]

That 3 year anniversary episode on dynamite confused me because I was thinking the first dynamite (even though I clearly remember it in October). Then they said it was in honor of the first double or nothing. It’s weird because it was 6 months before they had tv, so everything between all in and dynamite feels like this weird kind of proto AEW

[Soultastic]

What I think about is Double or Nothing since it was their first big show, but really the anniversary should be whenever AEW legally became a thing.

[eJm]

Yeah, I do agree the wording of that was weird (just call it Double or Nothing week, it'd be like if WWE said WrestleMania was the birth of the WWWF when it clearly wasn't) and I'm of the opinion that the formation of the company is the anniversary.

[polarbearpete]

I feel like the first show (Double or Nothing) is the beginning of the company.

[Kalmia]

I'd say the press conference would be the founding of the company, but I'd prefer they celebrated the anniversary on the first Dynamite. That's when it became a proper TV wrestling promotion. Before that, it was just a group putting on odd shows.

[john84]

I know the New Years Announcement is the one that's mostly seen as the birth of Dynamite (based on the poll at least) but for me it was ''All In''.

[ASYLUMHAUSEN]

Where’s the “when Hangman’s phone was shown on BTE on the last episode of 2018 and it was the AEW logo” option?

[Push R Truth]

When you could pay to receive an official AEW product. (entertainment/merch/whatever)

[clifford]

It's birth is the announcement, but having its anniversary around Double or Nothing makes sense, if that makes sense!