|
Post by Killah Ray on Dec 14, 2022 21:32:23 GMT -5
Mandy has a Fantime site which is the bootleg Only Fans...
|
|
JoDaNa1281
Crow T. Robot
Jackie Daytona, Regular Human Bartender. #BLM
Posts: 41,984
|
Post by JoDaNa1281 on Dec 14, 2022 21:35:05 GMT -5
So, uh, what does $30 get you really? Asking for a friend. I also subbed to see what the fuss was about. Even the $30 stuff is still pretty steamy, so I better spoiler-tag it: {Spoiler}{Spoiler}{Spoiler}{SPOILER: CLICK TO SHOW}
|
|
john84
Fry's dog Seymour
Proud Father of 3 :)
Posts: 24,299
|
Post by john84 on Dec 14, 2022 21:35:49 GMT -5
Genuinely surprised by this news.
|
|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Dec 14, 2022 21:52:02 GMT -5
I mean it’s more so Mattel than wwe. But in their eyes they have action figures that kids play with, so whatever photos of Mandy’s is leaked will look bad on Mattel. Granted that’s what I think their perspective is, I think all 3 parties made the right choice. Wwe doesn’t wanna f*** their sponsorship with Mattel, Mattel doesn’t want someone who is representing their action figures having nudes, and Mandy made the right choice making more money with her gig and not destroying her body It does not look bad on Mattel and if Mattel objected to something that obscure, WWE should stand up for their employee/independent contractor. Idk im sure Mattel makes more money for wwe than Mandy Rose and this isn’t a Saudi situation where they are against human rights. Im sure wwe isn’t the only company that would do this either.
|
|
|
Post by 1 Free Moon-Down with Burger on Dec 14, 2022 22:55:03 GMT -5
So….like….can we promote stuff?
Because I got a ko-fi page and daddy needs to eat
|
|
|
Post by cassonova on Dec 14, 2022 23:12:47 GMT -5
So….like….can we promote stuff? Because I got a ko-fi page and daddy needs to eat Only OnlyFans...for...school projects. Yeah. That's the ticket.
|
|
asuka007
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 23,690
|
Post by asuka007 on Dec 14, 2022 23:44:24 GMT -5
I’ve heard reports that she was making more from her site than her WWE contract. And according to Alvarez, she had a main roster contract
So how crap is WWE paying a lot of their talent as well?
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Dec 14, 2022 23:49:18 GMT -5
Keep calling them independent contractors though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2022 23:57:32 GMT -5
Keep calling them independent contractors though. Regardless of job title that does not mean there are not rules to the position you will be fulfilling. The fact that this has to be repeated so many times is mindboggling. Nearly any publicly traded company would have issues with this situation especially if they were aware and it continued.
|
|
|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Dec 15, 2022 0:11:25 GMT -5
Mandy's shit was LEAKED and not made public
No. She chose to sell content online, which the company had warned her she wasn't permitted to do. She kept doing it anyway. So they got rid of her.
The Paige situation was a leak. A violation of privacy. Something she had no control over.
This was a different situation entirely, where the talent in question decided to open a web store to profit from content which he chose to distribute.
Two very, very different things.
One was a leak, the other was content she released to the public as a business choice.
They are different in a way - the fact that there is money being exchanged. But in both situations, there is the assumption of privacy. When you open up these sites, you of course run the risk of the content being distributed elsewhere. But there are various places throughout the process that tell the consumer you can't do that and that goes against the agreement when you purchase said content. When you send a partner an explicit picture of yourself, you do so with the risk that it could be spread either through someone else or through your partner but with the agreement (both implicit and explicit) that it shall remain between the consenting adults. The difference between those situations is why the picture is being exchanged but the assumption that it stays within the parties is still there.
|
|
|
Post by Dave the Dave on Dec 15, 2022 0:12:23 GMT -5
Keep calling them independent contractors though. Regardless of job title that does not mean there are not rules to the position you will be fulfilling. The fact that this has to be repeated so many times is mindboggling. Nearly any publicly traded company would have issues with this situation especially if they were aware and it continued. It doesn’t HAVE to be repeated so much.
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Dec 15, 2022 0:15:20 GMT -5
but did she SIGN a contract
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2022 0:16:16 GMT -5
Regardless of job title that does not mean there are not rules to the position you will be fulfilling. The fact that this has to be repeated so many times is mindboggling. Nearly any publicly traded company would have issues with this situation especially if they were aware and it continued. It doesn’t HAVE to be repeated so much. Fair enough it's just all a bit perplexing at times and it isn't nearly as bad here but regardless of her tax employment status she violated her working agreement. Independent contractors do not just get free reign to do whatever they want wherever they work...that is the fallacy that wrestling social has created.
|
|
DichEvans
Samurai Cop
Lenny Lazy Lane Stinks
Posts: 2,245
|
Post by DichEvans on Dec 15, 2022 0:26:13 GMT -5
This is more revealing than anything on Mady's OF. It was produced by Disney owned ESPN and on regular newsstands across the country
|
|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Dec 15, 2022 0:27:11 GMT -5
It doesn’t HAVE to be repeated so much. Fair enough it's just all a bit perplexing at times and it isn't nearly as bad here but regardless of her tax employment status she violated her working agreement. Independent contractors do not just get free reign to do whatever they want wherever they work...that is the fallacy that wrestling social has created. Yes! I’m technically an independent contractor bringing leads to my company and performing a service but I signed a contract and I can’t bring leads to other companies that do the same business and if I make an ass out of myself on social media, they can can me
|
|
|
Post by Killah Ray on Dec 15, 2022 0:30:25 GMT -5
This is more revealing than anything on Mady's OF. It was produced by Disney owned ESPN and on regular newsstands across the country LMAO...no it's not...
|
|
Jonathan Michaels
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Archduke of Levity
Here since TNA was still kinda okay
Posts: 18,553
|
Post by Jonathan Michaels on Dec 15, 2022 0:31:11 GMT -5
I’ve heard reports that she was making more from her site than her WWE contract. And according to Alvarez, she had a main roster contract So how crap is WWE paying a lot of their talent as well? I forget where, but I heard she’s making in the range of $250k a month. I don’t imagine a lot of talent are making $3 million a year.
|
|
|
Post by lockedontarget on Dec 15, 2022 0:36:13 GMT -5
Companies need to understand that things like OnlyFans aren’t going anywhere and when you’re someone like Mandy that can make a boatload of money for super easy work why would you not do it? To keep a job working for a company that doesn't permit it.
If you choose to keep working there. If you stand to make more working elsewhere, then don't work there anymore.
Companies have rules, you can either choose to follow, or choose not to. But if you choose not to, they probably won't keep you around.
I’m tired of this being to go-to excuse for when companies do shitty things. I’m tired of “it’s just how business works” being how people write off every crappy thing the WWE does. It’s a bad rule that no company should have. We need to normalize the idea that sex workers shouldn’t suffer consequences for being sex workers. We need to start calling out the companies that do this, on the regular.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2022 0:40:21 GMT -5
This is more revealing than anything on Mady's OF. It was produced by Disney owned ESPN and on regular newsstands across the country How by definition is this more revealing when Mandy's pictures included full nudity? Like what am I missing here?
|
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on Dec 15, 2022 0:45:02 GMT -5
On a related note, a friend of mine runs a Horror Youtube Channel even if he age restricts his review vids Youtube will barely permit any gore or nudity at all if he wants ad dollars. America has always had a strong puritanical streak. It is quite ridiculous when compared to other countries how uptight America is.
|
|