|
Post by "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik on Jan 6, 2024 13:45:37 GMT -5
I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years: ![](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0a282d9a2211bca156a543750eb479736357c77b/370_242_600_360/master/600.jpg?width=1200&height=1200&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&s=4b6adf12d6ebbe92d045eefe772c28ed)
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Jan 6, 2024 13:49:10 GMT -5
I thought this was about candy?
|
|
Hypnosis
FANatic
Posts: 105,142
Member is Online
|
Post by Hypnosis on Jan 6, 2024 14:07:37 GMT -5
I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years: ![](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0a282d9a2211bca156a543750eb479736357c77b/370_242_600_360/master/600.jpg?width=1200&height=1200&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&s=4b6adf12d6ebbe92d045eefe772c28ed) I was thinking Goldberg.
|
|
asuka007
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 23,089
Member is Online
|
Post by asuka007 on Jan 6, 2024 14:44:53 GMT -5
I mean heβs not wrong.
|
|
J is Justice
Patti Mayonnaise
Will now be grateful.
Hi.
Posts: 31,269
Member is Online
|
Post by J is Justice on Jan 6, 2024 15:06:38 GMT -5
I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years: ![](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0a282d9a2211bca156a543750eb479736357c77b/370_242_600_360/master/600.jpg?width=1200&height=1200&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&s=4b6adf12d6ebbe92d045eefe772c28ed) I was thinking Goldberg. I was thinking A Little Doo Doo .
|
|
|
Post by A Little Doo Doo on Jan 6, 2024 15:49:30 GMT -5
I look like that NOW, because of TROLLS like YOU.
|
|
|
Post by defectiveepitaph on Jan 6, 2024 16:56:39 GMT -5
Thick means stupid over here. Iβm Canadian and thatβs where my mind went to too. Was quite confused for a second Iβm also Canadian, and I understand what thick means in this context, tho normally itβs spelled βthiccβ.
|
|
"Magic" Mark Hurr
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Here, have some chili dogs
Now featuring half the brain that you do.
Posts: 16,486
Member is Online
|
Post by "Magic" Mark Hurr on Jan 6, 2024 17:17:34 GMT -5
This angle is gonna end with An Officer and A Gentleman moment where Kris carries away Stokley. But after he gets knocked out. So he doesn't even remember it happening.
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 6, 2024 17:33:58 GMT -5
Okay, it's never been wrong to talk about finding someone of legal age attractive, it was just don't be obscene or overly weird. There are people that find other people attractive and shaming people for that is just as wrong as the threads and posts that are overly perverted.
On top of all that, this is also all talking about a part the show.
|
|
|
Post by Rudy Gobert Fingers on Jan 6, 2024 17:40:19 GMT -5
|
|
UN PLOMBIER NIGHTMARE #blm
Fry's dog Seymour
Sponsored by Arizona Green Tea/Peanuts But Only At Baseball Stadiums/Biscuits Cat Adoption Agency
Posts: 22,492
|
Post by UN PLOMBIER NIGHTMARE #blm on Jan 7, 2024 2:21:05 GMT -5
I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years: ![](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0a282d9a2211bca156a543750eb479736357c77b/370_242_600_360/master/600.jpg?width=1200&height=1200&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&s=4b6adf12d6ebbe92d045eefe772c28ed) waltuh, Iβm not gonna let stokely be my manager right now waltuh
|
|
|
Post by Banjo Is Broken on Jan 7, 2024 2:51:19 GMT -5
I'm having a difficult time gaging the percentage of people in this thread who think this is just a random perv thread against the percentage of people who actually seem to get that this is a reference to the Stokely Hathaway segment on Rampage. Maybe it would be easier if we had a "Dislike" option. ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png)
|
|
Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]
FANatic
Writer, Lover of all things Wrestling. Analytical, Critical, Lovable (hopefully). Lets all have fun!
Posts: 243,882
Member is Online
|
Post by Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-] on Jan 7, 2024 2:52:17 GMT -5
I'm having a difficult time gaging the percentage of people in this thread who think this is just a random perv thread against the percentage of people who actually seem to get that this is a reference to the Stokely Hathaway segment on Rampage. Maybe it would be easier if we had a "Dislike" option. ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) They aren't sure what to think about AEW outdoing FAN itself ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png)
|
|
|
Post by Banjo Is Broken on Jan 7, 2024 3:03:04 GMT -5
If people are confused, I could just go back to posting about how Marina Shafir should be wearing a fox costume. The message there seems pretty cut and dry.
|
|
4real
Wade Wilson
Posts: 28,579
|
Post by 4real on Jan 7, 2024 5:53:56 GMT -5
Stat eventually agrees to have Stokely manage her after saving him from Mox who heard rumours Stokely was going to run him over with a Mitsubishi.
|
|
clifford
King Koopa
Shingo Takagi stan
Posts: 10,690
|
Post by clifford on Jan 7, 2024 12:31:42 GMT -5
Stokely is low key the best non wrestler on the roster.
|
|
|
Post by Ronny Rayguns Is All Elite on Jan 7, 2024 13:23:10 GMT -5
Stokely is low key the best non wrestler on the roster. Dude has quotables EVERY time he's on screen.
|
|
Lupin the Third
Patti Mayonnaise
I'm sorry.....I love you. *boot to the head*--3rd most culpable in the jixing of NXT, D'oh!
Join the Dark Order....
Posts: 36,392
|
Post by Lupin the Third on Jan 7, 2024 13:35:41 GMT -5
|
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 28,228
|
Post by chazraps on Jan 7, 2024 14:55:22 GMT -5
Okay, it's never been wrong to talk about finding someone of legal age attractive, it was just don't be obscene or overly weird. There are people that find other people attractive and shaming people for that is just as wrong as the threads and posts that are overly perverted. On top of all that, this is also all talking about a part the show. Nobody is shaming anybody for finding anybody attractive. That's hyperbole and an oversimplification, as well as a dangerous dismissal, of a real problem, especially equating it to being "just as wrong" as being "overly perverted." It's people making threads with titles that deliberately objectify a person that posters in this thread are taking an issue with. Objectification is what makes it an issue, and makes members of this forum uncomfortable. That's what makes it wrong. That said, I don't think the OP intended this, but perhaps they should have put "thicker than a Snickers" in quotation marks and made it clearer that the thread is about Stokely's attempt to win Statlander's favor and directly quoting him rather than the emojis (unintentionally) implying this was going to be one of those "LOOK AT THIS WOMAN'S BODY" threads. And there are ways to go about talking about someone being attractive without it being unsettling and driving people away from the forum. Things like "Kris' new gear looks great" or "I really dig Ruby's new look" or "New Maria Photoshoot just dropped" - those aren't going to bother anyone or make people thing the forum is regressing to the 2011 days of polls where users thought the media caused more misandry than misogyny. Not trying to come at you, we all have blindspots, but it makes things better for everyone to hear out why people feel deeply about certain things rather than immediately chalking it up to "Shaming."
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,858
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jan 7, 2024 15:21:31 GMT -5
Okay, it's never been wrong to talk about finding someone of legal age attractive, it was just don't be obscene or overly weird. There are people that find other people attractive and shaming people for that is just as wrong as the threads and posts that are overly perverted. On top of all that, this is also all talking about a part the show. Nobody is shaming anybody for finding anybody attractive. That's hyperbole and an oversimplification, as well as a dangerous dismissal, of a real problem, especially equating it to being "just as wrong" as being "overly perverted." It's people making threads with titles that deliberately objectify a person that posters in this thread are taking an issue with. Objectification is what makes it an issue, and makes members of this forum uncomfortable. That's what makes it wrong. That said, I don't think the OP intended this, but perhaps they should have put "thicker than a Snickers" in quotation marks and made it clearer that the thread is about Stokely's attempt to win Statlander's favor and directly quoting him rather than the emojis (unintentionally) implying this was going to be one of those "LOOK AT THIS WOMAN'S BODY" threads. And there are ways to go about talking about someone being attractive without it being unsettling and driving people away from the forum. Things like "Kris' new gear looks great" or "I really dig Ruby's new look" or "New Maria Photoshoot just dropped" - those aren't going to bother anyone or make people thing the forum is regressing to the 2011 days of polls where users thought the media caused more misandry than misogyny. Not trying to come at you, we all have blindspots, but it makes things better for everyone to hear out why people feel deeply about certain things rather than immediately chalking it up to "Shaming." I'm not really going to touch on anything else here in the post, that's a whole other conversation, but I do think it isn't really on the OP to put quotation marks when it's discussed in the thread proper. It's not really their responsibility to hold people's hands on that. I absolutely get being "once bitten, twice shy" on these kinds of things, but people dropping into a thread without context and getting combative is behavior that is on the person doing it at the end of the day, and the kind of thing we should try to do better about across the board.
|
|