Kris Statlander; Thicker Than A Snickers 🍫🍫🍫

["Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik]

I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years:

[Tiger Millionaire]

I thought this was about candy?

[Hypnosis]

Jan 6, 2024 13:45:37 GMT -5 "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik said:

I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years:

I was thinking Goldberg.

[asuka007]

I mean he’s not wrong.

[J is Justice]

Jan 6, 2024 14:07:37 GMT -5 Hypnosis said:

Jan 6, 2024 13:45:37 GMT -5 "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik said:

I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years:

I was thinking Goldberg.

I was thinking A Little Doo Doo .

[A Little Doo Doo]

Jan 6, 2024 15:06:38 GMT -5 J is Justice said:

Jan 6, 2024 14:07:37 GMT -5 Hypnosis said:

I was thinking Goldberg.

I was thinking A Little Doo Doo .

I look like that NOW, because of TROLLS like YOU.

[defectiveepitaph]

Jan 6, 2024 11:26:53 GMT -5 The Summer of Muskrat XVII said:

Jan 6, 2024 7:49:47 GMT -5 thirteen3 said:

Thick means stupid over here.

I’m Canadian and that’s where my mind went to too. Was quite confused for a second

I’m also Canadian, and I understand what thick means in this context, tho normally it’s spelled ‘thicc’.

["Magic" Mark Hurr]

This angle is gonna end with An Officer and A Gentleman moment where Kris carries away Stokley. But after he gets knocked out. So he doesn't even remember it happening.

[Error]

Okay, it's never been wrong to talk about finding someone of legal age attractive, it was just don't be obscene or overly weird. There are people that find other people attractive and shaming people for that is just as wrong as the threads and posts that are overly perverted.

On top of all that, this is also all talking about a part the show.

[Rudy Gobert Fingers]

[UN PLOMBIER NIGHTMARE #blm]

Jan 6, 2024 13:45:37 GMT -5 "Evil Brood" Jackson Vanik said:

I'm convinced Kurt will look like this in 10 years:

waltuh, I’m not gonna let stokely be my manager right now waltuh

[Banjo Is Broken]

I'm having a difficult time gaging the percentage of people in this thread who think this is just a random perv thread against the percentage of people who actually seem to get that this is a reference to the Stokely Hathaway segment on Rampage. Maybe it would be easier if we had a "Dislike" option.

[Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]]

Jan 7, 2024 2:51:19 GMT -5 Banjo Is Broken said:

I'm having a difficult time gaging the percentage of people in this thread who think this is just a random perv thread against the percentage of people who actually seem to get that this is a reference to the Stokely Hathaway segment on Rampage. Maybe it would be easier if we had a "Dislike" option.

They aren't sure what to think about AEW outdoing FAN itself

[Banjo Is Broken]

If people are confused, I could just go back to posting about how Marina Shafir should be wearing a fox costume. The message there seems pretty cut and dry.

[4real]

Stat eventually agrees to have Stokely manage her after saving him from Mox who heard rumours Stokely was going to run him over with a Mitsubishi.

[clifford]

Stokely is low key the best non wrestler on the roster.

[Ronny Rayguns Is All Elite]

Jan 7, 2024 12:31:42 GMT -5 clifford said:

Stokely is low key the best non wrestler on the roster.

Dude has quotables EVERY time he's on screen.

[Lupin the Third]

[chazraps]

Jan 6, 2024 17:33:58 GMT -5 Error said:

Okay, it's never been wrong to talk about finding someone of legal age attractive, it was just don't be obscene or overly weird. There are people that find other people attractive and shaming people for that is just as wrong as the threads and posts that are overly perverted.

On top of all that, this is also all talking about a part the show.

Nobody is shaming anybody for finding anybody attractive. That's hyperbole and an oversimplification, as well as a dangerous dismissal, of a real problem, especially equating it to being "just as wrong" as being "overly perverted."

It's people making threads with titles that deliberately objectify a person that posters in this thread are taking an issue with. Objectification is what makes it an issue, and makes members of this forum uncomfortable. That's what makes it wrong.

That said, I don't think the OP intended this, but perhaps they should have put "thicker than a Snickers" in quotation marks and made it clearer that the thread is about Stokely's attempt to win Statlander's favor and directly quoting him rather than the emojis (unintentionally) implying this was going to be one of those "LOOK AT THIS WOMAN'S BODY" threads.

And there are ways to go about talking about someone being attractive without it being unsettling and driving people away from the forum. Things like "Kris' new gear looks great" or "I really dig Ruby's new look" or "New Maria Photoshoot just dropped" - those aren't going to bother anyone or make people thing the forum is regressing to the 2011 days of polls where users thought the media caused more misandry than misogyny.

Not trying to come at you, we all have blindspots, but it makes things better for everyone to hear out why people feel deeply about certain things rather than immediately chalking it up to "Shaming."

[Mozenrath]

Jan 7, 2024 14:55:22 GMT -5 chazraps said:

Jan 6, 2024 17:33:58 GMT -5 Error said:

Okay, it's never been wrong to talk about finding someone of legal age attractive, it was just don't be obscene or overly weird. There are people that find other people attractive and shaming people for that is just as wrong as the threads and posts that are overly perverted.

On top of all that, this is also all talking about a part the show.

Nobody is shaming anybody for finding anybody attractive. That's hyperbole and an oversimplification, as well as a dangerous dismissal, of a real problem, especially equating it to being "just as wrong" as being "overly perverted."

It's people making threads with titles that deliberately objectify a person that posters in this thread are taking an issue with. Objectification is what makes it an issue, and makes members of this forum uncomfortable. That's what makes it wrong.

That said, I don't think the OP intended this, but perhaps they should have put "thicker than a Snickers" in quotation marks and made it clearer that the thread is about Stokely's attempt to win Statlander's favor and directly quoting him rather than the emojis (unintentionally) implying this was going to be one of those "LOOK AT THIS WOMAN'S BODY" threads.

And there are ways to go about talking about someone being attractive without it being unsettling and driving people away from the forum. Things like "Kris' new gear looks great" or "I really dig Ruby's new look" or "New Maria Photoshoot just dropped" - those aren't going to bother anyone or make people thing the forum is regressing to the 2011 days of polls where users thought the media caused more misandry than misogyny.

Not trying to come at you, we all have blindspots, but it makes things better for everyone to hear out why people feel deeply about certain things rather than immediately chalking it up to "Shaming."

I'm not really going to touch on anything else here in the post, that's a whole other conversation, but I do think it isn't really on the OP to put quotation marks when it's discussed in the thread proper. It's not really their responsibility to hold people's hands on that. I absolutely get being "once bitten, twice shy" on these kinds of things, but people dropping into a thread without context and getting combative is behavior that is on the person doing it at the end of the day, and the kind of thing we should try to do better about across the board.