|
Post by sarkerpolseng on Jan 22, 2024 2:52:49 GMT -5
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,972
Member is Online
|
Post by Mozenrath on Jan 22, 2024 4:12:14 GMT -5
I know some are tempted to laugh about it, given Pitchfork sometimes rubbing people the wrong way, but this is a bad thing for music criticism/journalism, and frankly, for music, period, since the discoverability of many musical acts has just taken another hit.
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Jan 22, 2024 9:17:25 GMT -5
Oh shit. I thought it was just Pitchfork changing hands, not that they were actually going onto the GQ brand as a f***ing subsection.
I also go to Pitchfork every day, and even sometimes re-read old reviews.
This is immensely f***ing depressing. Guess I won't be reading it any more.
edit: reading the article, it's actually quite non-committal, it's claiming that Pitchfork will remain the same essentially, but... I have my doubts
|
|
Spider2024
Patti Mayonnaise
Dedicated 6,666th post to Irontyger
I believe in Joe Hendry.
Posts: 39,779
|
Post by Spider2024 on Jan 22, 2024 9:22:09 GMT -5
Oooh man, the pitchforks are really going to be out for this one.
|
|
mo
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 17,034
Member is Online
|
Post by mo on Jan 22, 2024 9:25:29 GMT -5
It stopped being what made it unique a long time ago. It’s no different from most mainstream music sites anymore.
|
|
|
Post by SneakMan on Jan 24, 2024 9:41:03 GMT -5
Their scoring system has always been a joke and some of their reviews, especially in the earlier days, are incredibly pretentious and snobby. That said, they did help get a lot of exposure to bands that otherwise would’ve remained obscure, and their Sunday reviews of classic albums are very enjoyable deep dives.
|
|