You want a title shot in AEW?

[This Player Hating Mothman]

Feb 23, 2024 21:56:55 GMT -5 Dr. Bolty, Disaster Enby said:

Feb 23, 2024 21:53:39 GMT -5 This Player Hating Mothman said:

Also this has been mostly overlooked in favour of (rightfully, I think) focusing on the Deonna stuff, but there is something so blazingly disingenuous about framing a hard fought 30 minute time limit draw as "get into a number one contender match and make sure not to actually win it" like what?

I'm going to give a little benefit of the doubt and assume he meant Danny Garcia vs. Adam Copeland, which was a bit of a weird choice. But, given the story is that Copeland has been removed, that leaves the contender standing as a pretty logical #1 contender, if an underdog.

Right, forgot that situation. That'd be less greasy, but definitely still a situation where it's hardly a guy losing his way to a title shot. The kind of uncharitable summaries that like twitter goobs would describe the show with to make it sound bad, complete with the cry laughing emoji.

[Cyno]

Feb 23, 2024 21:53:39 GMT -5 This Player Hating Mothman said:

Also this has been mostly overlooked in favour of (rightfully, I think) focusing on the Deonna stuff, but there is something so blazingly disingenuous about framing a hard fought 30 minute time limit draw as "get into a number one contender match and make sure not to actually win it" like what?

Even with that match, Swerve and Hangman were already ranked #1 and #2 before that match. A draw resulting in a triple threat is a perfectly logical consequence of that. A draw isn't a loss after all.

[4real]

Feb 23, 2024 19:40:49 GMT -5 markymark said:

Aww Im a bit disappointed the OP wasnt being sarcastic, his post wouldve made more sense if it was the period between late 2023-Jan 2024 when there were valid complains about the show doing too many open challenges.

Who said I wasn’t being sarcastic? Sorry if the thread annoyed anybody but it was just a joke.

[Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]]

Feb 24, 2024 5:05:27 GMT -5 4real said:

Feb 23, 2024 19:40:49 GMT -5 markymark said:

Aww Im a bit disappointed the OP wasnt being sarcastic, his post wouldve made more sense if it was the period between late 2023-Jan 2024 when there were valid complains about the show doing too many open challenges.

Who said I wasn’t being sarcastic? Sorry if the thread annoyed anybody but it was just a joke.

Fair enough that you weren't actually trying to annoy anyone but uh... yeah if this was a joke it landed about as well as Logan Paul's Moonsault did lol

[Fundertaker]

Feb 24, 2024 5:05:27 GMT -5 4real said:

Feb 23, 2024 19:40:49 GMT -5 markymark said:

Aww Im a bit disappointed the OP wasnt being sarcastic, his post wouldve made more sense if it was the period between late 2023-Jan 2024 when there were valid complains about the show doing too many open challenges.

Who said I wasn’t being sarcastic? Sorry if the thread annoyed anybody but it was just a joke.

In all my years on the internet I learnt that sarcasm in written form is easily misinterpreted if not accompanied by the right emoji.

I would reccomend the following:

[lucas_lee]

Feb 24, 2024 5:05:27 GMT -5 4real said:

Feb 23, 2024 19:40:49 GMT -5 markymark said:

Aww Im a bit disappointed the OP wasnt being sarcastic, his post wouldve made more sense if it was the period between late 2023-Jan 2024 when there were valid complains about the show doing too many open challenges.

Who said I wasn’t being sarcastic? Sorry if the thread annoyed anybody but it was just a joke.

People that say this irk me. If you don't put anything that says it's a joke or sarcasm we won't be able to tell. I'm not trying to come at you but I've seen people who say genuinely reprehensible things and try to backtrack using that arguement.