Mitch 4:20
Don Corleone
The Cherry One
Posts: 2,062
|
Post by Mitch 4:20 on Feb 1, 2007 2:12:52 GMT -5
Batista(c) vs Cena(c) vs Undertaker vs Kennedy vs Lashley(c) vs in an EliminationChamber or HIAC Match...(elimination rules) First 3 out are losers, Top 3 fight for the belts. 3rd takes ECW, 2nd takes WWE, 1st takes the World Heavyweight Championship. Or I guess you could flipflop the two REAL titles and make the WWE Title the 1st place prize. If you don't like the elimination rules, then just the first man to pin a Champion wins that Champ's belt and ends the match. If a Champ makes a pin on either another Champ or a challenger, the match ends and he wins a second belt(if applicable). Whadya think... good... or bad? I think my idea is good, but I think some of you won't like how I implemented(sp?) it...
|
|
kkliq
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 467
|
Post by kkliq on Feb 1, 2007 2:16:51 GMT -5
That would be a great idea, but it would make the losing brands and their main titles look second and third-rate.
|
|
|
Post by heffer111 on Feb 1, 2007 2:27:51 GMT -5
no
|
|
Mitch 4:20
Don Corleone
The Cherry One
Posts: 2,062
|
Post by Mitch 4:20 on Feb 1, 2007 2:29:09 GMT -5
Thanks for your overwhelming insight and the time you took to share your thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by heffer111 on Feb 1, 2007 2:33:09 GMT -5
Thanks for your overwhelming insight and the time you took to share your thoughts. Ok, i think it's stupid. your first option treats the first 2 belts won like they don't matter and who would want to see any of those guys in ecw, but mostly treats the other championships as second tier. and your second option is stupid, putting your 6 main eventers into one match that ends in the first pinfall. nooooooo there, happy?
|
|
|
Post by heffer111 on Feb 1, 2007 2:35:27 GMT -5
not to mention elimination chamber should only be used once a year, and not in a gimmicky vince russo type match as that, specially at WM
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Feb 1, 2007 2:41:32 GMT -5
The WM main event shouldn't be a big gimmick like an Elimination Chamber. And showing the belts as weaker to the others probably shouldn't be done.
|
|
Mitch 4:20
Don Corleone
The Cherry One
Posts: 2,062
|
Post by Mitch 4:20 on Feb 1, 2007 2:42:30 GMT -5
Fine, what if a challenger pinned a champ, he wins the belt but the match continues... both men are eliminated. Repeat so that the next champ is pined or retains, thus eliminating two more and getting us down to two men. If somehow a champ pinned a champ and walked out with two belts and left us with two challengers in the ring, then thew final 2 would fight to a finish and the winner gets to face his brand's Champion on their brand's very next show.
There. Better?
|
|
|
Post by heffer111 on Feb 1, 2007 2:44:08 GMT -5
Fine, what if a challenger pinned a champ, he wins the belt but the match continues... both men are eliminated. Repeat so that the next champ is pined or retains, thus eliminating two more and getting us down to two men. If somehow a champ pinned a champ and walked out with two belts and left us with two challengers in the ring, then thew final 2 would fight to a finish and the winner gets to face his brand's Champion on their brand's very next show. There. Better? No. Here, they use gimmicky type matches like elimination chambers to get a draw, for a PPV like WM u dont need that, becauase u dont need a gimmick match to get a draw. not to mention how damn confusing that shit u just typed is.
|
|
kkliq
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 467
|
Post by kkliq on Feb 1, 2007 3:15:50 GMT -5
Seriously, there's no way to have a match like the Chamber have more than one winner.
|
|