King Rich
Samurai Cop
Just here for the fads.
Posts: 2,244
|
Post by King Rich on Jan 31, 2007 13:51:50 GMT -5
It's just a question.
|
|
|
Post by seanwalsh on Jan 31, 2007 13:58:39 GMT -5
Announcing everyone seems to indicate that we don't know who they are. I saw a house show Rumble once where they did this and it just seemed insulting, like we didn't know who Sgt. Slaughter, Adam Bomb or Doink the Clown were.
Plus playing the entrance music for each entrant is basically like announcing who each person is.
Announcing just the first 2 is normal because it's treating the Rumble like a normal match. Heck, one year Finkel didn't announce either #1 or 2 (2001 I believe) and it kinda seemed weird.
|
|
Johnny Danger (Godz)
Wade Wilson
loves him some cavity searches
Lord Xeen's going to kill you.
Posts: 27,736
|
Post by Johnny Danger (Godz) on Jan 31, 2007 14:01:40 GMT -5
As long as they play the entrance themes, first two, but it'd be nice if they made an announcement when someone was eliminated.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 31, 2007 14:04:38 GMT -5
If Finkel did the announcing, then I'd want everyone announced. Otherwise, just the first two.
|
|
|
Post by valiens on Jan 31, 2007 14:07:03 GMT -5
If Finkel did the announcing, then I'd want everyone announced. Otherwise, just the first two. agreed.
|
|
King Rich
Samurai Cop
Just here for the fads.
Posts: 2,244
|
Post by King Rich on Jan 31, 2007 14:11:40 GMT -5
If Finkel did the announcing, then I'd want everyone announced. Otherwise, just the first two. Yeah that's kinda what I was thinking too. How is it insulting/patronising having every wrestler's name announced? They get announced in one-on-one matches, is it insulting then?
|
|