|
Post by KB Klash is nWo 4 Life on Jan 29, 2007 19:40:45 GMT -5
I'd rather Cena beat UT at Wrestlemania than Batista beat him, if thats what they are planning, but if they want UT to win, it would be better for him to beat Batista.
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 29, 2007 19:42:12 GMT -5
Taker vs Batista. At least I think they will have Taker beat Batista. With Cena he might win clean for all I know.
"MAH GAWD KANG, CENA OVERCAME THE ODDS OF THE WIN STREAK AT MANIA. WHETHER YOU LOVE HIM OR HATE HIM blah blah blah".
|
|
Garcia Vega
Bubba Ho-Tep
"Please don't get angry ladies, I only call ya b****es cause I don't know your names individually."
Posts: 516
|
Post by Garcia Vega on Jan 29, 2007 19:43:48 GMT -5
Undertaker vs Batista. We've already seen him face Cena before.. there is just something really appealing about UT and Batista facing for the first time.
I honestly don't believe they are going to job Undertaker at WM. If they were going to, I'm pretty sure they'd have had a Raw superstar win the Rumble and just have Undertaker win some sort of tournament or something. Since he won the Rumble, my bet is that he is winning at Wrestlemania.
Also, I'm very much looking forward to a Batista heel turn. I hope they go with that as opposed to face vs face.
|
|
Jeff
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,074
|
Post by Jeff on Jan 29, 2007 20:11:21 GMT -5
All UT has left is his streak and I ont see him ever losing it, nor should he.
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Jan 29, 2007 21:12:57 GMT -5
Where is the Bobby Lashley vs Undertaker one?
|
|
|
Post by normcoleman on Jan 29, 2007 21:15:07 GMT -5
Taker vs. Cena.....
|
|
|
Post by dvy on Jan 29, 2007 21:21:05 GMT -5
dude...when i heard Lashley was an option,i was like "HOLY CRAP!!!! DEAD MAN vs BINGO HALL CHAMPION...YES!!!!"
*crosses fingers* pick lashley....c'mon 'taker..
|
|
|
Post by KB Klash is nWo 4 Life on Jan 29, 2007 23:18:47 GMT -5
Where is the Bobby Lashley vs Undertaker one? I laughed when it was even suggested as a possibility tonight on Raw. The Undertaker wouldnt waste his time with that weak ass shit. That would be like using his title opportunity to go for the IC belt. It aint gonna happen.
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 23:21:50 GMT -5
All UT has left is his streak and I ont see him ever losing it, nor should he. As if this streak is all he's ever done with his life. Nevermind the fact that he's already a certifiable legend, several time former WWF Champ (including holding the Undisputed Title while it was in existence), and had many great matches against the likes of Mankind, Kurt Angle, Shawn Michaels, et al.
|
|
|
Post by 'Sweet n' Sour' A. A. Estrada on Jan 29, 2007 23:24:02 GMT -5
I'd like to see Cena/Taker. It would be a better match by far.
Undertaker would win and retire with his 15-0 streak.
He would also give Cena the nod for sticking in there with him, a sort of 'he'll do' passing of the torch.
Far more intelligent than having Undertaker lose to Batista, a man who tears a muscle when he picks up a drink and who has three years left in the business, at the most.
|
|
|
Post by amplifierWORSHIP! on Jan 29, 2007 23:24:14 GMT -5
doesn't matter at this point, Vince's golden boys will go over Taker no matter what. but, i think at least Cena/Taker could potentially be entertaining. Batista should've went the way of Lesnar at this point and just quit.
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 23:26:07 GMT -5
I'd like to see Cena/Taker. It would be a better match by far. Undertaker would win and retire with his 15-0 streak. He would also give Cena the nod for sticking in there with him, a sort of 'he'll do' passing of the torch. Far more intelligent than having Undertaker lose to Batista, a man who tears a muscle when he picks up a drink and who has three years left in the business, at the most. "He'll do"?! What is Cena, a pig that also herds sheep?! I don't care if Taker keeps his streak or not, but I don't think he should retire with the title. The thought of that happening annoys me to know end.
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Jan 29, 2007 23:26:46 GMT -5
I agree about Taker vs Cena for Wrestlemania. Although it would be weird seeing him with a spinner belt.
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 23:29:41 GMT -5
I agree about Taker vs Cena for Wrestlemania. Although it would be weird seeing him with a spinner belt. Maybe they'll give Taker a new belt...It'll be like an urn with straps, or something.
|
|
|
Post by amplifierWORSHIP! on Jan 29, 2007 23:29:46 GMT -5
I agree about Taker vs Cena for Wrestlemania. Although it would be weird seeing him with a spinner belt. if he did win, he better bury that belt and resurrect it as a zombie championship, bound in human skin like the necronomicon.
|
|
|
Post by 'Sweet n' Sour' A. A. Estrada on Jan 29, 2007 23:32:28 GMT -5
I'd like to see Cena/Taker. It would be a better match by far. Undertaker would win and retire with his 15-0 streak. He would also give Cena the nod for sticking in there with him, a sort of 'he'll do' passing of the torch. Far more intelligent than having Undertaker lose to Batista, a man who tears a muscle when he picks up a drink and who has three years left in the business, at the most. "He'll do"?! What is Cena, a pig that also herds sheep?! I don't care if Taker keeps his streak or not, but I don't think he should retire with the title. The thought of that happening annoys me to know end. If Trish gets to retire with the Women's Championship, I'd say Undertaker has the right to retire with the WWE Championship. Then they can have a big tournament involving everyone on the RAW roster from top to bottom. It would be a lot more interesting than Cena holding onto the belt ... again.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Jan 29, 2007 23:36:10 GMT -5
"He'll do"?! What is Cena, a pig that also herds sheep?! I don't care if Taker keeps his streak or not, but I don't think he should retire with the title. The thought of that happening annoys me to know end. If Trish gets to retire with the Women's Championship, I'd say Undertaker has the right to retire with the WWE Championship. Then they can have a big tournament involving everyone on the RAW roster from top to bottom. It would be a lot more interesting than Cena holding onto the belt ... again. that should happen Why should Trish get a better send off than Taker
|
|
|
Post by Big DSR Energy on Jan 29, 2007 23:47:38 GMT -5
"He'll do"?! What is Cena, a pig that also herds sheep?! I don't care if Taker keeps his streak or not, but I don't think he should retire with the title. The thought of that happening annoys me to know end. If Trish gets to retire with the Women's Championship, I'd say Undertaker has the right to retire with the WWE Championship. Then they can have a big tournament involving everyone on the RAW roster from top to bottom. It would be a lot more interesting than Cena holding onto the belt ... again. The difference between Trish and the Undertaker...is the difference between the Women's Title and the WWE Title. WWE doesn't give a crap about the Women's Title. Hell, there have been YEARS where there wasn't even a recognized Women's champion. They don't care about that belt. Or the women's division. Otherwise, they'd hire more actual female wrestlers. Comparing the women's division and the rest of the show is like comparing apples to...uh, rotten apples in your basement that no one has paid attention to for years.
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Jan 29, 2007 23:56:40 GMT -5
I agree about Taker vs Cena for Wrestlemania. Although it would be weird seeing him with a spinner belt. if he did win, he better bury that belt and resurrect it as a zombie championship, bound in human skin like the necronomicon. Actually I would mark out for that! I guess all belts should be personalized. I see Orton's being a purse with shit in it!
|
|
|
Post by 'Sweet n' Sour' A. A. Estrada on Jan 30, 2007 0:11:07 GMT -5
If Trish gets to retire with the Women's Championship, I'd say Undertaker has the right to retire with the WWE Championship. Then they can have a big tournament involving everyone on the RAW roster from top to bottom. It would be a lot more interesting than Cena holding onto the belt ... again. The difference between Trish and the Undertaker...is the difference between the Women's Title and the WWE Title. WWE doesn't give a crap about the Women's Title. Hell, there have been YEARS where there wasn't even a recognized Women's champion. They don't care about that belt. Or the women's division. Otherwise, they'd hire more actual female wrestlers. Comparing the women's division and the rest of the show is like comparing apples to...uh, rotten apples in your basement that no one has paid attention to for years. My point is that Undertaker is very deserving of a royal sendoff. He's done a lot for the company. He's made them buckets of money. He remains one of their biggest attractions after all his years. He stayed loyal to the company through the Monday Night Wars. He's also changed his style every few years to remain somewhat fresh, and is probably in the best shape of his life right now. And the fact of the matter is that he won the Rumble and he's going up against SOMEONE, be it Batista, Lashley or Cena. Cena is really the only guy out of that trio that could contribute to a match of this magnitude. I FEEL like it's Undertaker's last hurrah, and 15-0 is a nice round number. Much better than 14-1. The only way I'd really support him losing would be if they did something drastic with John Cena's character and turned him into someone that did more than mug for the crowd. I was impressed with Cena's performance tonight, so I think they'd mesh well.
|
|