Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 29, 2007 12:24:38 GMT -5
After watching the Rumble last night, a couple of things struck me as odd with King Booker. Firstly, he dropped the old popular Booker T catchphrase "Tell me... he didn't just say that" which was a nice comedy bit. But then later in the Royal Rumble match, after being eliminated, he opened a serious can of whoopass on Kane. Kane, the guy GMs like to sic on poor hapless heels like King Booker. But there Booker is, wailing away on Kane like a pitbull, which seemed very unlike the cowardly King Booker character.
Has the good King run his course?
|
|
|
|
Post by seanwalsh on Jan 29, 2007 12:25:55 GMT -5
Sounds like a royal overthrow is in store for Smackdown...?
|
|
|
|
Post by ringrust on Jan 29, 2007 12:37:01 GMT -5
I hope so.While it was fun while it lasted,it's time for the Bookman to get back to basics.I'd give anything to hear can you dig it sucka? or to see a spinarooni again.
|
|
|
|
Post by BorneAgain on Jan 29, 2007 12:40:52 GMT -5
It'll be interesting to see what they do with him, especially in regards to Wrestlemania build-up.
|
|
Dynamic Dee
ALF
I love it when they call me Big Papa
Posts: 1,174
|
Post by Dynamic Dee on Jan 29, 2007 12:42:06 GMT -5
I liked it better when King Booker had the belt and was ruling the Smackdown "kingdom". I'm thinking he will hold onto the "King" title until the next King of the Ring tourney.
|
|
bigHEADinc
El Dandy
Wanted Conway Twitty as a special title.
lest we forget...
Posts: 7,711
|
Post by bigHEADinc on Jan 29, 2007 12:55:50 GMT -5
A Kane/Booker T feud would be pretty interesting... I think they could have some enjoyable matches...
|
|
|
|
Post by Metalheadbanger Man on Jan 29, 2007 13:38:14 GMT -5
A Kane/Booker T feud would be pretty interesting... I think they could have some enjoyable matches... Yeah this could be the start of something good. As long as we don't get Sharmell screaming "All hail King Booker" anymore then I'm happy. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulk With A Mustache on Jan 29, 2007 13:40:32 GMT -5
Well, I think the King Booker gimmick has run its course. It's time he became Booker T again so he can get back to basics and WWE can give the king title to someone else when the King of the Ring happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Jan 29, 2007 13:42:45 GMT -5
Well, I think the King Booker gimmick has run its course. It's time he became Booker T again so he can get back to basics and WWE can give the king title to someone else when the King of the Ring happens. All Hail King Miz! HOORAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Legion
Fry's dog Seymour
Amy Pond's #1 fan
Hail Hydra!
Posts: 23,374
|
Post by Legion on Jan 29, 2007 13:48:30 GMT -5
Hmmm, i like the King Booker gimmick, where as the Booker T thing was stale.
Returning to that seems a step back for Booker when they could let the gimmick run four more months and have a king vs new king fued after this years KOTR
|
|
|
|
Post by Avalanche Alvarez on Jan 29, 2007 14:47:45 GMT -5
After watching the Rumble last night, a couple of things struck me as odd with King Booker. Firstly, he dropped the old popular Booker T catchphrase "Tell me... he didn't just say that" which was a nice comedy bit. But then later in the Royal Rumble match, after being eliminated, he opened a serious can of whoopass on Kane. Kane, the guy GMs like to sic on poor hapless heels like King Booker. But there Booker is, wailing away on Kane like a pitbull, which seemed very unlike the cowardly King Booker character. Has the good King run his course? I hope so. It had it's moment. Staleness is setting it. |
|
|
|
Post by Sawylent White on Jan 29, 2007 14:56:31 GMT -5
After watching the Rumble last night, a couple of things struck me as odd with King Booker. Firstly, he dropped the old popular Booker T catchphrase "Tell me... he didn't just say that" which was a nice comedy bit. But then later in the Royal Rumble match, after being eliminated, he opened a serious can of whoopass on Kane. Kane, the guy GMs like to sic on poor hapless heels like King Booker. But there Booker is, wailing away on Kane like a pitbull, which seemed very unlike the cowardly King Booker character. Has the good King run his course? I hope so. It had it's moment. Staleness is setting it. I don't agree that staleness is setting in, I think it might just be that since his feud with Batista he hasn't really had a feud. He hasn't had a chance to play it up the way he did when he had numerous feuds as champion. Now that he seemingly has a Kane feud starting up I'd like to see him stick with the whole King bit. |
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Jan 29, 2007 15:01:08 GMT -5
I hope so.While it was fun while it lasted,it's time for the Bookman to get back to basics.I'd give anything to hear can you dig it sucka? or to see a spinarooni again. |
|
