|
Post by Threadkiller [Classic] on Jan 28, 2007 22:47:56 GMT -5
Rank the 2007 Royal Rumble from 0 stars to 5.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Jan 28, 2007 22:48:37 GMT -5
4 stars. The Royal Rumble ALWAYS delievers.
|
|
|
Post by voiceboxisback on Jan 28, 2007 22:48:46 GMT -5
4.5, Great rumble!
|
|
Jeff
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,074
|
Post by Jeff on Jan 28, 2007 22:49:12 GMT -5
The First 3 Matches were bad but Umacena and the Rumble helped a bit so I guess 2?
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Jan 28, 2007 22:49:14 GMT -5
Fantastic match, the ending was the best i've seen for a long time, in fact it's the first time i've cared since about 99
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Jan 28, 2007 22:50:36 GMT -5
5
MNM/Hardys - 4
Boretista/Kennedy - 3.5 (Kennedy carried it)
Cena/Umaga - 4.5 (Cena winning knocks half a point off)
Lashly/Test - 2
RUMBLE - 5 (Awsome Rumble)
|
|
|
Post by The middle finger is offensive on Jan 28, 2007 22:51:40 GMT -5
5 for being in the SA
|
|
|
Post by Allison Reynolds on Jan 28, 2007 23:02:48 GMT -5
4. A GREAT PPV!
The first 3 matches were sort of boring. Got to hand it to Umaga and Cena. Match of the night, other than the RR.
|
|
|
Post by rrm15 on Jan 28, 2007 23:04:32 GMT -5
4.5 Fantastic.
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 28, 2007 23:04:39 GMT -5
This is just the Rumble match itself right? If so 4.5. It was a little predicable on the final 2 but, after that is was pure awesomeness.
|
|
SmarkyMark
Team Rocket
My Arachnasense is tingling! Wrestlecrap must be near!
Posts: 849
|
Post by SmarkyMark on Jan 28, 2007 23:09:23 GMT -5
The RR match itself was one of the best I've seen in a while. [The ending made up for Khali headbutting and brain-chopping through half the entrants.] Cena/Umaga was waaaaay better than it had any right to be. The rest was meh but I'm still kinda glad I got it.
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 28, 2007 23:10:18 GMT -5
Just the Rumble match? 4 sounds good to me.
|
|
|
Post by steamboat1 on Jan 28, 2007 23:18:46 GMT -5
Almost as perfect of rumble as possible....and really the first time in a long while you had no clue which of the last two would win. 4.85 and I rank it 2nd of all time.
|
|
|
Post by subject2 on Jan 28, 2007 23:23:39 GMT -5
I think the ending adds points...the rumble match itself wasn't that great IMO..nothing really happened..not many interesting moments...the HBK undertaker showdown was the only thing good about the rumble match..u just didnt know which way it would go...but the rest was meh
|
|
Garee
King Koopa
I miss the old days
Posts: 11,338
|
Post by Garee on Jan 28, 2007 23:25:14 GMT -5
I'd have to give it a 4.5, The Test, Lashley countout disaster, and Boring Batista brought it down, but solid tage match, Kennedy, Great Cena/Umaga, and classic Rumble brought it way back up
|
|
|
Post by A Dubya (El Hombre Muerto) on Jan 28, 2007 23:34:49 GMT -5
Almost as perfect of rumble as possible....and really the first time in a long while you had no clue which of the last two would win. 4.85 and I rank it 2nd of all time. I agree wholeheartedly. I gave the Rumble show as a whole a 4/5. The Cena overcoming the odds, and winning after Umaga got choked out was a little disappointing, even though I enjoyed the match somewhat. Hell, anytime Cena wins, I am disappointed, so I guess that shouldn't count. But anyway, I loved the Rumble match, itself, and given the way the WWE has been for the last few years, I was happily surprised for Taker to get his time to shine, and also to see my top two favorite wrestlers be still in the match at the end. They may be old, but dammit, they have earned the right to have that spot, and they put on a fantastic finish despite the botch at the end. I may be in the minority on this, but MOST of the up-and-comers in the WWE have not showed me that much It's been a long time since I've felt like this about wrestling, so I give it a solid 4. The undercard, and test vs. Lashley brought it down a little, though.
|
|