Wpuld you mark for another WWE Title Royal Rumble?

[subject2]

I was just thinkin hopw everyone claims 1992 rumble 2 be the best..the fact that the wwf title was at stakes was ..i think what made it all the more special...i was just wondering why they have never done it since.

Id love for this to happen again...imagine vince coming out and aying the championship would be won in the rumble match (maybe it ws forefited due 2 injury etc)...it would have the potential star power that 1992 had...imagine having Cena,batista,taker.HHH,HBK.edge..and whoever is main eventing at the time in the rumble..u cd even have legends come back to try and reclaim the gold one more time..hogan.slaughter..flair....dam..it would be so awesome!!!

It would make it harder to choose a winner..and i think it would be an edge of your seat match..i cant put in2 words how much id mark out for this 2 happen again.

What you guys think...would u want this 2 happen again?

[Mr Captain Falcon]

Actually it'd be new, with so many choices to win the belt, like Val Venis, Big Vis, Benjamin, Thorn, Holly, Sandman, Helms, Kennedy, Londrick.... that would be pretty cool.

[KingPopper]

They should have done it last year with Batista's title.

[Hiroshi Hase]

Nah, not really. It's not as exciting as it was in early 92. With the current roster, I could care less even if the title was on the line.

[MGH]

I would like to see it.

[NIXON]

I vote yes, but I would never...EEEEEEVER click on a circle next to the words OH HELL YEAH! cause I would just feel like a tool.

[x]

Yes. But only for a Undisputed Title. Even if the World/WWE titles were combined it would mean more. And I would only like it if it was used to put someone new in the main event scene. There would be no point in starting a new title reign with someone who's been in the main event scene for a while.

[tna]

I would like it, but it'd be tricky to do with three titles and three brands.

[Kevin Hamilton]

yes. yes I would. That's at least part of why '92 was so great.