|
|
Post by alfusmaximus on Jan 25, 2007 15:26:17 GMT -5
so, from what i've read... all 30 contestants have been named for the rumble.
does this mean no surprise entrances this year?
|
|
|
|
Post by seanwalsh on Jan 25, 2007 15:28:22 GMT -5
Holly still has to be taken out, unless he's gonna do what Booker T did last year (he was hurt, he came in for a few seconds, and got tossed right out by Benoit) - except it'll be Test who causes his elimination.
And I keep thinking there's gonna be some bust-up during that Hardyz/MNM match that might knock 1 or 2 of them out of the Rumble match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fireravenv on Jan 25, 2007 15:31:13 GMT -5
and your surprise entrant will once again be....
Saba Simba!
|
|
|
|
Post by Tea & Crumpets on Jan 25, 2007 15:39:50 GMT -5
No surprise entrants?> Boy this Rumble's gonna suck. Unless they remove The Hardyz and Niro due to the tag match, and Helms so he can have his unfortunate squash match with The Boogeyman. The card's quite packed for a Rumble at the moment though ,so I can't see there being any more matches. We need surprise entrants, I'd wager a lot of people only order the Rumble hoping for a suprise return by some big names we haven't seen in ages. A Royal Rumble without surprises is like a broken toilet- pretty crappy.
Interesting fact- Out of the last 4 royal Rumbles, 3 have been won by a SD guy, 1 by a Raw guy. Hopefully SD will take it again with a shot-in-the-dark entrant. But I expect Randy Orton to bore his way to WrestleMania, or Undertaker to predictably win, unfortunately.
|
|
