|
|
Post by j2thabill on Jan 24, 2007 21:06:51 GMT -5
as i remember it undertaker unknowling left kane to die when undertaker dad and mum's s house burnt down by accident. But kane survived, so paul(kane dad he slept with undertaker's mum)raised kane and he came back for revenge then undertaker turned heel and said he burnt the house down on purpose, i remember the chockeslams in the parents coffins or something  then the whole katie vick and kane not really being deformed he only imagined the fire at the home burnt him? stuff undertaker then tried to kill paul at the gab 2004 with the crypt thing, why i cant remember? then journey into darkness does his story make sense to anyone anymore and if undertaker intentionally killed his parents how come we still cheer for him?  |
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Jan 24, 2007 21:13:47 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2007 21:16:45 GMT -5
Time travel and a talking pie
|
|
|
|
Post by amsiraK on Jan 24, 2007 21:19:20 GMT -5
Don't make him read that. It doesn't clear ANYTHING UP. Kane's back story ends with Glenn Jacobs apparently careening his rental into Vince McMahon's, dooming him to storylines with no continuity whatsoever. And yet, trooper that he is, he plays the hell out of each and every stupid twist and turn that has no apparent connection to the one that came before. Just look right at the light...  That should fix everything. |
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 24, 2007 21:21:22 GMT -5
undertaker then tried to kill paul at the gab 2004 with the crypt thing, why i cant remember? 'Taker took out Bearer as he was 'Taker's one weakness. Anybody (in this case the Dudleys and Paul Heyman) could get to him through Bearer. And Journey Into Darkness fills in the Kane mysteries quite well. |
|
|
|
Post by j2thabill on Jan 24, 2007 21:29:03 GMT -5
wiki disagrees en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journey_into_Darkness still has holes and wiki says Three months later, Paul Bearer was kidnapped by the Dudley Boyz at the direction of Paul Heyman, who then took "control" of Undertaker in the storyline. At The Great American Bash 2004, Undertaker buried Bearer in cement. Fans were later told that Bearer was "seriously injured", but in reality, he was simply removed from WWE programming due to health reasons. i never saw this event sadly, story confuses me? just wonder if anyone understood the apprent final version of his past ? did undertaker murder his own parents then? and have we just forgave him |
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Jan 24, 2007 22:57:47 GMT -5
I like Glen Jacobs, as I feel he plays the gimmick well and can do moves that not many 6'7 guys can do such as a hurricanrana. I do feel that the WWE ruined the Kane for me after repeated bad storylines involving him. Glen deserves much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by SHAKEMASTER TV9 is Don Knotts on Jan 24, 2007 23:02:03 GMT -5
Time travel and a talking pie Ron Howard, you've done it again. |
|
|
|
Post by Lenny: Smooth like Keith Stone on Jan 24, 2007 23:06:25 GMT -5
Don't make him read that. It doesn't clear ANYTHING UP. Kane's back story ends with Glenn Jacobs apparently careening his rental into Vince McMahon's, dooming him to storylines with no continuity whatsoever. And yet, trooper that he is, he plays the hell out of each and every stupid twist and turn that has no apparent connection to the one that came before. Just look right at the light... That should fix everything. That picture is GENIUS!!!! Great work! It answers quite a few questions about WWE storyline endings actually. For example: QUESTION: What was the deal with Fake Kane? ANSWER: QUESTION: Didn't Eugene turn heel? ANSWER: QUESTION: What was Beth Phoenix's history with Mickie James? ANSWER: QUESTION: That Marcus Cor Von fellow looks awfully familiar. Haven't we seen him somewhere before ECW? ANSWER: |
|
|
|
Post by amsiraK on Jan 24, 2007 23:08:44 GMT -5
It's one I get LOTS of use out of, unfortunately. DX to Kane: "...And we have no problem with you." |
|
"IcePic" Rick Cobos
Don Corleone
www.ericbischoff.com - some great comedy material!!!
Posts: 2,002
|
Post by "IcePic" Rick Cobos on Jan 24, 2007 23:16:30 GMT -5
Please answer these questions:
- Did MNM break up last May?
- Did someone break Edge's neck in February 2003 and put him on the shelf? Who did that?
|
|
Stotty
Unicron
This is what happens when you don't give Taker the hot tag
Posts: 2,932
|
Post by Stotty on Jan 24, 2007 23:41:27 GMT -5
seriously, who did that? im assuming its orton, but i cant remember
|
|
|
|
Post by pearljam on Jan 25, 2007 0:23:26 GMT -5
Don't make him read that. It doesn't clear ANYTHING UP. Kane's back story ends with Glenn Jacobs apparently careening his rental into Vince McMahon's, dooming him to storylines with no continuity whatsoever. And yet, trooper that he is, he plays the hell out of each and every stupid twist and turn that has no apparent connection to the one that came before. Just look right at the light... That should fix everything. That picture is GENIUS!!!! Great work! It answers quite a few questions about WWE storyline endings actually. For example: QUESTION: What was the deal with Fake Kane? ANSWER: QUESTION: Didn't Eugene turn heel? ANSWER: QUESTION: What was Beth Phoenix's history with Mickie James? ANSWER: QUESTION: That Marcus Cor Von fellow looks awfully familiar. Haven't we seen him somewhere before ECW? ANSWER: Awesome. |
|
|
|
Post by j2thabill on Jan 25, 2007 10:26:05 GMT -5
mabye the recent fake kane was going to actually be the real kane, bear with me... paul after he escaped the crypt had kidnapped real kane to trian him in secret more untill he was ready to finally defeat the undertaker once and for all. To hide this fact from the undertaker paul then hired an imposter to pretend to be kane and we have been watching an imposter ever since he lost the mask. wwe creative then realised this idea would suck and confuse people even more so they abadoned the idea? it could have gone down this way |
|
