|
|
Post by Count Creepyhead on Jan 21, 2007 16:27:20 GMT -5
After hearing this a few times on TV, I can't help but wonder..Is it??  |
|
|
|
Post by Doomrider on Jan 21, 2007 16:29:22 GMT -5
Austin will be in it...that's right...fitness expert Denise Austin!
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Jan 21, 2007 16:29:27 GMT -5
When you have greenhorns like the Miz running around in that Rumble, I'd say it's nowhere near being "star-studded".
|
|
|
|
Post by Error on Jan 21, 2007 16:29:59 GMT -5
I'll say no right now but, that could change depending on who the final three entrants are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Count Creepyhead on Jan 21, 2007 16:31:21 GMT -5
I just can't believe they actually say it when talking about the Rumble. I know Vince is back to insulting intelligence (He always had, but he's back to Superstar era levels of it again), but does he really think the fans are That stupid??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2007 16:32:30 GMT -5
No. 1992 will always be that for me
|
|
Johnny Danger (Godz)
Wade Wilson
loves him some cavity searches
Lord Xeen's going to kill you.
Posts: 27,736
|
Post by Johnny Danger (Godz) on Jan 21, 2007 16:33:28 GMT -5
Yes, because Miz, Kenny Dykstra, Viscera and Carlito certainly outrank Hogan, Undertaker, Flair, Macho, Piper, Sid, Shawn, DiBiase and Savage.
riiiiiiiiiight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Psicosis Auto Theft on Jan 21, 2007 16:33:29 GMT -5
It's pretty much a promotional line. If a World title was on the line like when Flair won it '92 then maybe it would be the most star-studded.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Jan 21, 2007 16:37:06 GMT -5
It's pretty much a promotional line. If a World title was on the line like when Flair won it '92 then maybe it would be the most star-studded. I doubt having the title on the line would make the Rumble star-studded, especially in 2007 with WWE and their hardons for uncharismatic hosses or young greenhorns who can't talk to save their lives. |
|
|
|
Post by Doomrider on Jan 21, 2007 16:38:01 GMT -5
I hear they're gonna give Richards a spot...that's right...Michael Richards will be in the Royal Rumble!
|
|
NIXON
Unicron
Hail to the Chief Bootknocker
Posts: 3,354
|
Post by NIXON on Jan 21, 2007 16:38:04 GMT -5
I'm guessing there thought behind saying that is that this Rumble features the "stars" of 3 "promotions", thus making it more "star studded"
|
|
|
|
Post by Brick Killed a Guy on Jan 21, 2007 16:45:02 GMT -5
I hear they're gonna give Richards a spot...that's right...Michael Richards will be in the Royal Rumble! I'd mark if Monty (ehem...I mean Marquis) pounced him out. |
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on Jan 21, 2007 16:58:37 GMT -5
Flair/Hogan/Piper/Jake/Slaughter/Sid/HBK/Savage/DiBiase/Taker >>>>>> Flair/Benoit/Orton/Edge/Kane/RVD/HBK/Booker/Punk/Taker
Ha! I just noticed 3 guys (Flair, HBK, Taker) that were in the 1992 Rumble are confirmed for the 2007 Rumble
|
|
B.A.
Grimlock
Posts: 13,335
|
Post by B.A. on Jan 21, 2007 17:06:01 GMT -5
1992 will always...always be the best year.
|
|
|
|
Post by romafan87 on Jan 21, 2007 17:17:19 GMT -5
While it may not be, I'm excited for this year's lineup.
|
|
|
|
Post by Austin's Middle Finger on Jan 21, 2007 17:20:59 GMT -5
I don't think any Rumble will have anything close to the star power of the 1995 40 minute extravaganza.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2007 17:28:26 GMT -5
I hear they're gonna give Richards a spot...that's right...Michael Richards will be in the Royal Rumble! Yo yo yo.......Pop a 40 and check your rollies! |
|
|
|
Post by skskillz on Jan 21, 2007 17:52:57 GMT -5
The most star studded would have to be 1990, IMO, just based on top to bottom star power. But really anything Rumble from 1989-1992 would qualify. 2001 was also very good.
I haven't checked this year's list, nor do I care to, but it likely doesn't come close.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrestlinggod13 on Jan 21, 2007 18:09:59 GMT -5
The line-up isn't bad actually, but it is most certainly not the most star-studded Rumble. Not even close.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Jan 21, 2007 18:11:01 GMT -5
Flair/Hogan/Piper/Jake/Slaughter/Sid/HBK/Savage/DiBiase/Taker >>>>>> Flair/Benoit/Orton/Edge/Kane/RVD/HBK/Booker/Punk/Taker Ha! I just noticed 3 guys (Flair, HBK, Taker) that were in the 1992 Rumble are confirmed for the 2007 Rumble When you actually list the stars in this year's Rumble, things' don't look bad at all. And I remember everyone calling the 2001 Rumble star-studded as well. That year included Austin, Rock, Undertaker, Kane and *ahem* Rikishi, along with a whole bunch of other guys. Yeah, right. |
|
