bwo4life
Trap-Jaw
Those were the days.
Posts: 301
|
Post by bwo4life on Jan 15, 2007 19:42:56 GMT -5
So has anyone else heard bout this. I have a bad feeling bout it too. As it reads on prowrestling.com:
ECW writer Dave Lagana's original plan for the 1/9 match was for Punk to be on the verge of beating Holly with the Vise, but Holly would to struggle to the ropes and win with the feet on the ropes finish for a fluke pin. However, at the agent meeting before the show, the whole room turned on Punk. Anderson said that Holly should make Punk pay his dues. Also, some of the agents believe that he's "Heyman's guy", and that's he's not really very good and his being over is a fluke that was created by Heyman. Once again, Anderson said that Punk should pay his dues before they push him and there was no need for Holly to have to cheat to beat him because he's 'the real WWE Superstar'. The idea for the clean finish in the match came from Finlay.
Also, there were people backstage getting off on Holly chopping CM Punk hard during the match. "
That just bothered me. Not very good? Give me a friggin break. I respect Arn and all, but screw him. I have been enerteined in more of Punk's matches than I have in his. If they are just going to bury Punk, I might turn on WWE. They have such great talent and in my opinion under-use it. And Punk is the man who could save ECW. If they bury him, I might just head south for my wrestling fix.
So what does the future hold for Punk in all of your eyes'? Opinions of this situation?
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Jan 15, 2007 19:44:24 GMT -5
Sorry man, but this topic's been done already. Check pages two or three, I believe; if you wanna bump one of those, go ahead.
|
|