Post by Hobby Drifter on Feb 2, 2007 6:15:49 GMT -5
I came into wrestling during the Attitude Era. This was, perhaps, the biggest boom in wrestling history. When I first learned about what WWF wrestlers had to go through, I was shocked. Being on the road something like 250 days per year, having pay for their own flights/rental cars/hotels, etc. It sounded like a brutal lifestyle, but I could understand it. Everyone in the WWF was pretty damned over; everyone had an action figure; everyone had merch; and everyone seemed to be making some unbelievable cash. I could see people having little trouble with the brutal travel schedule for a decade or so for a million (or much more) per year.
But now... WWE is not nearly as booming as the WWF was. The smaller guys are usually just cannon fodder. If you're not in the main event picture, you probably don't even have a storyline. The undercard comes and goes so quickly, that a lot of dudes don't get action figures in every series of toys or even T-shirts. The "downside guarantees" for these people are still more than most people make in a regular 9-5 job, but is it enough to go out and hurt yourself 250 days out of the year? Is it enough to be away from your family/friends almost all of the time. Is it enough to deal with driving possibly hundreds of miles a day?
Sure, WWE's top guys and "company men" are well taken care of. They seldom drop out of the main event scene and are always involved in some storyline or another. Their pushes are never just killed. You rarely see an Attitude-Era hold-over turn into a jobber.
But what does WWE have to offer new talent? Guys like American Dragon, Samoa Joe, Brian Danielson, etc have flat out refused to sign with WWE. I think this is the first time where wrestlers prefer to stay on the indy scene or with smaller promotions like ROH or TNA. What has WWE done for its new guys? Who was the last new (indy) guy who "made it" in WWE? CM Punk was on his way, but apparently his push has been killed because the wrong ex-booker backed him. Everyone that's being pushed today is either a veteran or a monster.
So indy guys have started to think twice about signing with WWE. Their iron-clad contracts guarantee that, if it doesn't work out, they won't be working for three months (or, in Brock Lesnar's case, TEN YEARS.) They will probably be fed to the bigger guys sooner than later. They have to travel year round, even when they're injured, sick, etc. The money isn't that much better than TNA offers. And, of course, an increasing number of wrestling moves are banned in WWE.
Exposure aside, does WWE have anything to offer their new indy talent?
But now... WWE is not nearly as booming as the WWF was. The smaller guys are usually just cannon fodder. If you're not in the main event picture, you probably don't even have a storyline. The undercard comes and goes so quickly, that a lot of dudes don't get action figures in every series of toys or even T-shirts. The "downside guarantees" for these people are still more than most people make in a regular 9-5 job, but is it enough to go out and hurt yourself 250 days out of the year? Is it enough to be away from your family/friends almost all of the time. Is it enough to deal with driving possibly hundreds of miles a day?
Sure, WWE's top guys and "company men" are well taken care of. They seldom drop out of the main event scene and are always involved in some storyline or another. Their pushes are never just killed. You rarely see an Attitude-Era hold-over turn into a jobber.
But what does WWE have to offer new talent? Guys like American Dragon, Samoa Joe, Brian Danielson, etc have flat out refused to sign with WWE. I think this is the first time where wrestlers prefer to stay on the indy scene or with smaller promotions like ROH or TNA. What has WWE done for its new guys? Who was the last new (indy) guy who "made it" in WWE? CM Punk was on his way, but apparently his push has been killed because the wrong ex-booker backed him. Everyone that's being pushed today is either a veteran or a monster.
So indy guys have started to think twice about signing with WWE. Their iron-clad contracts guarantee that, if it doesn't work out, they won't be working for three months (or, in Brock Lesnar's case, TEN YEARS.) They will probably be fed to the bigger guys sooner than later. They have to travel year round, even when they're injured, sick, etc. The money isn't that much better than TNA offers. And, of course, an increasing number of wrestling moves are banned in WWE.
Exposure aside, does WWE have anything to offer their new indy talent?