|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Feb 1, 2007 14:13:34 GMT -5
As most of us know by now, the Road Warriors had a clause in their contracts that stated that the WWF/E couldn't put them in a storyline or gimmick that portrayed them in a poor light, this is how they got outta that storyline with Hawk being a drunk. this sounds like the one of the single greatest clauses in history! How did they get that one in, and nobody else hasn't? imagine not having to join the Kiss my ass club, or some of the other godawful things vince and his writers have put wrestlers through
Thoughts?
|
|
Chainsaw
T
A very BAD man.
It is what it is
Posts: 90,480
|
Post by Chainsaw on Feb 1, 2007 14:35:38 GMT -5
I think they either snuck one by Vince, or Vince had worse lawyers back then than he does now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Feb 1, 2007 15:00:08 GMT -5
There was competition not a monopoly.
|
|
"Hollywood" Cactus Matt
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
You couldn't ask for a better custom title!
How do you spell "Goddess"? C-H-R-I-S-T-Y!
Posts: 15,300
|
Post by "Hollywood" Cactus Matt on Feb 1, 2007 16:03:06 GMT -5
Gee, I wonder why they didn't do anything about Rocko the Talking Dummy.  |
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Feb 1, 2007 16:07:18 GMT -5
If I was gonna wrestle for Double Double E I would want just like, character control. They can choose when I win and lose, whatever, just want control over my character and promos...
|
|
Chainsaw
T
A very BAD man.
It is what it is
Posts: 90,480
|
Post by Chainsaw on Feb 1, 2007 16:20:49 GMT -5
If I was gonna wrestle for Double Double E I would want just like, character control. They can choose when I win and lose, whatever, just want control over my character and promos... You would probably choose to not get called by WWE, either. I'm guessing the mentality around there is it's either their way or the highway when it comes to character development. |
|
|
|
Post by Banned Member on Feb 1, 2007 20:11:44 GMT -5
So thats why Demolition got squashed in their mini feud.
Demolition> Road Warriors
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky Van Heineken on Feb 1, 2007 20:23:06 GMT -5
So, LOD 2000 wasn't a crappy idea that portrayed them in a negative light?
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Feb 1, 2007 20:24:37 GMT -5
Kane should have looked into that
|
|
|
|
Post by willywonka666 on Feb 1, 2007 20:26:57 GMT -5
So, LOD 2000 wasn't a crappy idea that portrayed them in a negative light? Well it did suck, but the Hawk angle was flat out embarrassing and a damn shame |
|
