Did "This Is TNA" win you over?

[wrestlesmarks]

I noticed last night how they ruined Samoa Joe's character and ruined a dream match. He was undefeated for a long time, Kurt Angle comes in, in his first match and beats him.

[mcmahonfan85]

wrestlesmarks said:

I noticed last night how they ruined Samoa Joe's character and ruined a dream match. He was undefeated for a long time, Kurt Angle comes in, in his first match and beats him.

no,no. angle doesn't just beat him...angle beats him in less than 15 minutes

[Mr. Backlund]

Even considering Bob Backlund gets the most camera time in the company (that's sarcasm, calm down), even I am still not going to really be bothered with tuning into TNA. If I'm around and nothing better is on, I'll tune in, but at this point in time, I have a hard time believing I'll have nothing better to do.

And yes, the camera was a complete joke. If WSX gets a ton of detractors commenting on it, I don't see why TNA is immune to having people call out their terrible ideas about production.

[RandomHero]

I think it could have been a lot better, but I don't get why people are being so negitive about it. It wasn't really that bad. The TNA films was kinda annoying, yeah, but if a little 2 second cut really offends you that much, well you my friend need to chill the hell out. I think it would have been improved a lot had they picked better matches, or even better, had they done a full 2 hour live show. For what it was though, I enjoyed it much more than the crap that was going on on Raw. Seriously, Donald Trump? Who gives a f***?....Stupid WWE marks...

[Richard]

hellsing920 said:

War Games (TNA calls it Lethal Lockdown, but it's the same match)?

While they have similar elements, they are not same.

War Games was a 8 man tag match (where two men start out and another joins every 30 sec. to 1 min.) in 2 rings surrounded by one cage with a roof.

Lethal Lockdown is an 8 man tag match (where two men start out and another joins every 30 sec. to 1 min.) in one cage where the roof is lowered on later and covered in weapons.

[JimHellwig]

Quote
"I think it could have been a lot better, but I don't get why people are being so negitive about it. It wasn't really that bad. The TNA films was kinda annoying, yeah, but if a little 2 second cut really offends you that much, well you my friend need to chill the hell out. I think it would have been improved a lot had they picked better matches, or even better, had they done a full 2 hour live show. For what it was though, I enjoyed it much more than the crap that was going on on Raw. Seriously, Donald Trump? Who gives a wax?....Stupid WWE marks... "



RandomHero, I couldn't agree more, and you said this a lot nicer than I could of. It's pretty simple, WWE marks all flock together and all agree with one another, just because it's the cool thing to do. I guess there's always going to be whiners, as that's basically all I've read in this thread.

Commence the whining, you stupid marks

I'm done!

[bigstamp2382]

This is my take, it isn't against WWE completely, it isn't for TNA completely. I was a HUGE wwe fan up untill a year ago. I've watched since I could sit up when I was a baby. But I have not watched a single raw for a year now. But glad to see some of my favorites on TNA. It isn't bashing WWE, WWE fans, as I enjoy wrestling. Just that the current WWE has been boring me to death and I sat through the Triple H era. I guess these last couple years I couldn't stand it anymore. But this TNA episode was great. I enjoyed the recaps as I don't buy many PPV's.

[HMARK Center]

General warning, folks: don't turn this into a "bashfest" on either "TNA sheep" or "WWE sheep". If you want to point out things you perceive about either company's fanbase, do it in a civilized, intelligent, and (if you can manage it) eloquent manner.

I don't want a stupid flamewar here because someone says something like "how typical of WWE/TNA/ROH/WSX/PWG/CHIKARA/GARVIN STOMP marks".