|
|
Post by tna on Feb 13, 2007 0:25:08 GMT -5
It's not really a spoiler since WWE.com is already advertising it on their homepage, but who will Vince pick to challenge Trump, who will no doubt choose the most boring champion ever, Bobby Lashley?
|
|
|
|
Post by Count Creepyhead on Feb 13, 2007 0:26:44 GMT -5
Shane VS Hogan. The Hogan not working for WWE anymore is smarkbait
|
|
|
|
Post by tna on Feb 13, 2007 0:29:41 GMT -5
Shane vs. Big Orange would be boring.
Now Lashley vs. Khali, that's entertainment, but for all the wrong reasons.
|
|
Corporate H
Grimlock
He Buries Them Alive
Posts: 13,829
|
Post by Corporate H on Feb 13, 2007 0:31:44 GMT -5
Bald Snitsky.
|
|
|
|
Post by tna on Feb 13, 2007 0:35:01 GMT -5
only WWE would pick 2 bald wrestlers to wrestle eachother in a hair match where the representative of the losing baldy will become bald himself. Snitsky should paint his head to look like a Skittle. |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Powers of Paine on Feb 13, 2007 0:36:33 GMT -5
only WWE would pick 2 bald wrestlers to wrestle eachother in a hair match where the representative of the losing baldy will become bald himself. Snitsky should paint his head to look like a Skittle. I smell a Gooker nominee here. |
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Feb 13, 2007 0:37:41 GMT -5
I'm guessing Khali. Maybe Umaga, but I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
Post by tna on Feb 13, 2007 0:40:51 GMT -5
only WWE would pick 2 bald wrestlers to wrestle eachother in a hair match where the representative of the losing baldy will become bald himself. Snitsky should paint his head to look like a Skittle. I smell a Gooker nominee here. JR: BAH GAWD ALMIGHTY! SNITSKY IS FRUITY, FRUITY, FRUITY, FRUITY, DELICIOUS AND FRUITY! SNITSKY, SNITSKY, STONECOLD! STONECOLD! FRUITY! |
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Feb 13, 2007 0:42:35 GMT -5
This is really spoilerish, though I did see it.
I'll be honest. I marked for this. A hair vs hair match is ALWAYS good, mostly because someone is going to get humiliated. This is definitely the best way to do this McMahon vs Trump thing, as the hair vs hair stipulation adds so much to this match.
|
|
|
|
Post by tna on Feb 13, 2007 0:45:16 GMT -5
This is really spoilerish, though I did see it. I'll be honest. I marked for this. A hair vs hair match is ALWAYS good, mostly because someone is going to get humiliated. This is definitely the best way to do this McMahon vs Trump thing, as the hair vs hair stipulation adds so much to this match. And there you go drunk on optimism again. Just once, look on the bad side. Things are more fun over here. Apple Juice tastes better over here. |
|
Mitch 4:20
Don Corleone
The Cherry One
Posts: 2,062
|
Post by Mitch 4:20 on Feb 13, 2007 0:50:38 GMT -5
Nobody goes to WWE.Com...
This was still a spoiler to me, dammit!
|
|
Garee
King Koopa
I miss the old days
Posts: 11,338
|
Post by Garee on Feb 13, 2007 0:50:50 GMT -5
Vince is going to choose Mr. Dependable Val Venis
|
|
|
|
Post by tna on Feb 13, 2007 0:56:06 GMT -5
How funny would it be if it was a squash match.
Like Lashley beat Val Venis in under a minute. Vince's facial expression would be priceless.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Varsity Club on Feb 13, 2007 0:56:16 GMT -5
I really dont care who because the match will suck but im tellin you right now brutus the barber beefcake will be cuttin hair at wm this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by MysteryPartner on Feb 13, 2007 1:27:49 GMT -5
why didn't you put Goldberg and Brock Lesnar as choices? oh yeah.. you're not TNA dang.. I always get those two confused sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by rrm15 on Feb 13, 2007 1:29:43 GMT -5
Umaga or Khali. It'll probably be Khali but I bet Umaga and Lashley could work a good match together.
|
|
|
|
Post by tna on Feb 13, 2007 1:31:07 GMT -5
NO votes for Finlay?
I am legit surprised.
|
|
|
|
Post by MysteryPartner on Feb 13, 2007 1:34:36 GMT -5
I'm goin for the hitman
|
|
