WCW/NWA VS WWF/E

[JoshWoodrumGreaterThanHBK]

Which was better?

My opinion.... WWF/E!

Just look at 1989... in NWA/WCW you had Ric Flair VS Ricky Steamboat and in WWF/E you had.... Hulk Hogan VS Randy Savage

Yeah thats one hard...

[Arturo Classico]

I have to say WCW/NWA they had way better talent and most of the WWE talent were made else where in AWA or NWA. So definitely NWA/WCW. But don't bash Savage he was awesome in the eighties but never was given the credit he deserved also Roberts, Rude and DiBiase.

[T.J. "the Crippler" Stevens]

I think History speaks for itself. The only time WCW/NWA began to overtake WWF was after they started spending money on sets, pyro, big name wrestlers, prime time TV, etc. (I'm not saying that these examples are all that it took. But do you think they'd be succesful without these asthetics?) They needed to at least partially copy the WWF to be succesful, and even when they did, they lost.

[heyguesswhatidid]

Look at 2000 you had Kurt Angle vs. The Rock or Sid Vs. Steiner

[oltrelamorte]

WWF/E

[Outsider744]

kingsofwrestling said:

I have to say WCW/NWA they had way better talent and most of the WWE talent were made else where in AWA or NWA. So definitely NWA/WCW. But don't bash Savage he was awesome in the eighties but never was given the credit he deserved also Roberts, Rude and DiBiase.

Alright, while I also believe that WCW/NWA was better, your point doesn't make sense. Where you said that WWE's talent was made elsewhere, WCW's biggest stars (with the exception of a few) were from WWE and even ECW. With that said, I loved the WCW product in the late 90's and thought it was second to none.

[Spankymac is sick of the swiss]

I'll always be an NWA/WCW mark, no matter how bad it got in spots.