|
|
Post by rrm15 on Feb 21, 2007 16:28:04 GMT -5
Where's that Tomko "NO" pic when you need it...
seriously, Wrestlemania just got SIGNIFICANTLY worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Feb 21, 2007 16:34:33 GMT -5
Where's that Tomko "NO" pic when you need it... seriously, Wrestlemania just got SIGNIFICANTLY worse. Why do I have a feeling that you, and a lot of people, would feel the same way no matter who Khali faced? I heard that the Khali/Taker Last Man Standing was actually pretty decent. I know he isn't CM Punk, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. |
|
|
|
Post by rrm15 on Feb 21, 2007 17:40:28 GMT -5
Where's that Tomko "NO" pic when you need it... seriously, Wrestlemania just got SIGNIFICANTLY worse. Why do I have a feeling that you, and a lot of people, would feel the same way no matter who Khali faced? I heard that the Khali/Taker Last Man Standing was actually pretty decent. I know he isn't CM Punk, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. The match is just so random. Why move Khali to SmackDown for the sole purpose of having him face Kane? Why does WWE keep putting Kane in feuds like this and expecting us to take him seriously? He NEVER wins his feuds. And no, I don't think the match will be that good. Maybe with some type of stipulation, yes, it'll be fine, but overall they could have done something else with this spot on the card. |
|
