|
|
Post by thegame415 on Feb 21, 2007 13:35:36 GMT -5
looks like it'll be khali vs kane at WM..Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by akkountent on Feb 21, 2007 13:54:40 GMT -5
I think the general consensus is Khali vs anybody is pure garbage. The only role that Khali should have at WM is a funny backstage skit in-between matches; possibly teaming him up w/ some divas and Ron Simmons to give us our "Damn" moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by ronsimmons on Feb 21, 2007 14:00:48 GMT -5
I'll mark for Kane pasting him. If Kane loses I'll be salty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Z-A Sandbaggin' Son of a b!%@h on Feb 21, 2007 14:12:55 GMT -5
Brain chop
|
|
|
|
Post by Bushwanker on Feb 21, 2007 14:15:47 GMT -5
Kahli would actually make a good face, they need to turn him.
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Feb 21, 2007 15:02:15 GMT -5
I like it...Khali vs. Kane.
Hopefully, Khali gets chokeslammed, but I see Kane getting Chokebombed.
If anything, Khali should have shown up on random shows, causing carnage and demanding real competition. Someone stands up to him and at Wrestlemania defeats the monster. It would get them some major cred.
However, Khali/Kane could work in the right environment...
|
|
|
|
Post by TRMcGillicutty on Feb 21, 2007 15:03:35 GMT -5
Meh, Khali is not worth watching in the ring, they seriously need to make him the 911 of WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thread Pirate Roberts on Feb 21, 2007 15:03:54 GMT -5
As much as i like Kanes ring work, this match is going to be a trainwreck.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2007 15:04:55 GMT -5
Unless its a hardcore or falls count anywhere match, I don't see it being that good.
|
|
|
|
Post by amplifierWORSHIP! on Feb 21, 2007 15:12:52 GMT -5
i think Khali being on the WWE payroll is a travesty, much less being booked on the biggest PPV of the year
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Feb 21, 2007 15:19:04 GMT -5
i think Khali being on the WWE payroll is a travesty, much less being booked on the biggest PPV of the year I have no problem with Khali being on the payroll considering where he sends the money, however, I think he should be more of an enforcer who wrestles only occasionally. Kane/Khali won't be as bad as expected...because people will expecting a whole lot of bad. |
|
Madagascar Fred
El Dandy
TAFKA roidzilla and SUFFERIN' SUCCOTASH SON!
Posts: 8,784
|
Post by Madagascar Fred on Feb 21, 2007 15:23:43 GMT -5
why the hell is Khali wrestling at WM? why?
|
|
|
|
Post by amplifierWORSHIP! on Feb 21, 2007 15:24:09 GMT -5
i think Khali being on the WWE payroll is a travesty, much less being booked on the biggest PPV of the year I have no problem with Khali being on the payroll considering where he sends the money, however, I think he should be more of an enforcer who wrestles only occasionally. Kane/Khali won't be as bad as expected...because people will expecting a whole lot of bad. good call, he is very noble in that sense i guess i just don't understand the appeal of hiring an immobile giant to wrestle. different strokes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2007 15:35:02 GMT -5
Khali vs Kane isn't a very good idea for a mania Khali match if they insist on having one.
Khali at mania should have an opponent that casual/non viewers can easily get behind, since many people get mania that don't watch much if at all. Kane isn't really that guy, he doesn't look the part.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Feb 21, 2007 15:36:31 GMT -5
I have no problem with it. Theres a lot of people out there that eat up the battle of the giants type thing. It will probably be better than expected because some wont be expecting to much. But I think it could be decent.
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Feb 21, 2007 15:37:39 GMT -5
It makes sense if you look at it.
Khali, the unstoppable monster, wants better competition. So what does he do? He finds the biggest dog without a fight and walks into his territory to get the first strike.
Kane should retaliate on Raw. This could relly take off into a decent angle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harmonica on Feb 21, 2007 15:48:48 GMT -5
I thought Kane was still fueding with King Booker
|
|
|
|
Post by Avalanche Alvarez on Feb 21, 2007 15:53:34 GMT -5
Yep. I see A LOT of that in the near future. But not much else. |
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Feb 21, 2007 16:15:54 GMT -5
I thought Kane was still fueding with King Booker I guess they decided to move them on. Having two veterans, who probably don't mesh that well (I didn't see the PPV), feud instead of allowing them to build "the future" seems counter productive... even if it did give us Booker's return to the movies. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2007 16:27:11 GMT -5
I thought Kane was still fueding with King Booker I guess they decided to move them on. Having two veterans, who probably don't mesh that well (I didn't see the PPV), feud instead of allowing them to build "the future" seems counter productive... even if it did give us Booker's return to the movies. I thought they had a pretty good match. The reason for the change is probably just the Kane/Booker feud was short term at best and I think Khali is the next monster heel for someone (either Cena or Lashley). By having him beat another monster at 'Mania it only helps his image. |
|
Hunt. Hunt.
