|
|
Post by RoloSolo IV on Jan 12, 2007 19:04:33 GMT -5
I did these polls before, but with just single stars.
I just think Los Guerreros has the edge simply because they had better matches.
|
|
B.A.
Grimlock
Posts: 13,335
|
Post by B.A. on Jan 12, 2007 19:07:13 GMT -5
nostalgia will always win
|
|
|
|
Post by THE Dinobot on Jan 12, 2007 19:07:58 GMT -5
Guerreros, as they were a bit more defined as workers than Shawn and Marty were way back when.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Jan 12, 2007 19:10:28 GMT -5
Los Guerreros put on some AWESOME matches with equally awesome tag teams. The only good team the Rockers ever faced was the Hart Foundation.
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Jan 12, 2007 19:33:24 GMT -5
Los Guerreros
|
|
nothing
Bubba Ho-Tep
nothing can stop me now because i do not care anymore.
Posts: 593
|
Post by nothing on Jan 12, 2007 19:40:51 GMT -5
Los Guerreros. I wasn't old enough for the Rockers (I don't even think WWE was broadcasted back then where I lived), but I always found Los Guerreros'/Eddie's gimmick as the best ever, and from what I remember the matches were awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by Choose Slack on Jan 12, 2007 20:14:31 GMT -5
As a TEAM, the Rockers really never did crap. They never held the WWF tag titles (not sure if they did in AWA). Los Guerreros were much better.
As single wrestlers though, HBK is easily one of the 10 best wrestlers over the last 25 years, as is Guerrero. Chavo is a bit better then Jannetty though IMO.
|
|
MetalGearDizzle
Samurai Cop
HEY HEY HEY YA f***IN NAZI! HOW ARE YA!
Posts: 2,170
|
Post by MetalGearDizzle on Jan 12, 2007 20:16:12 GMT -5
Rockers, they helped define current tag team wrestling with high flying tantum tags.
|
|
|
|
Post by Biggtone23 on Jan 12, 2007 20:20:24 GMT -5
I voted for the Rockers because they were really good for their age at the time, while the Guerreros had better workrate and matches they also had about an extra 5 years in the business by the time were are talking about.
Also you have to completely discount the titles won by these teams because in the late 80s early 90s you changed titles maybe 3 or 4 times a year as compared to now when the change about 10 times a year
|
|
|
|
Post by Rocky Van Heineken on Jan 12, 2007 20:32:59 GMT -5
The Rockers were crappy.
|
|
"IcePic" Rick Cobos
Don Corleone
www.ericbischoff.com - some great comedy material!!!
Posts: 2,002
|
Post by "IcePic" Rick Cobos on Jan 13, 2007 19:26:11 GMT -5
Why must you tease me with this?
Personally speaking, I'd prefer Rockers vs. Los Gringos Locos, but this is a dandy as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Jan 13, 2007 19:27:34 GMT -5
Personally I preferred the Guerreros.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Level was WRONG on Jan 13, 2007 20:08:32 GMT -5
Rockers. Although not to undermine the Guerreros as they were great. (As is expected really)
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Jan 13, 2007 20:18:32 GMT -5
I like nostalgia as much as the next person, but I'd have to go with Los Guerreros, too much experience on their side.
|
|
"IcePic" Rick Cobos
Don Corleone
www.ericbischoff.com - some great comedy material!!!
Posts: 2,002
|
Post by "IcePic" Rick Cobos on Jan 13, 2007 20:19:27 GMT -5
Rockers. Although not to undermine the Guerreros as they were great. (As is expected really) Nobody could undermine the kings of undermining - Los Guerreros. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by WinOwensWin on Jan 13, 2007 20:23:20 GMT -5
Definitely Los Guerreros. Sure, the Rockers really brought the idea of a high flying tag team to the WWF, but the Guerreros were so damn fine tuned.
|
|
"IcePic" Rick Cobos
Don Corleone
www.ericbischoff.com - some great comedy material!!!
Posts: 2,002
|
Post by "IcePic" Rick Cobos on Jan 13, 2007 20:25:08 GMT -5
How about this match?
TLC: Edge & Christian vs. Chris Hero & Claudio Castagnoli vs. Shawn Michaels & Marty Jannetty vs. Art Barr & Eddie Guerrero
|
|
