|
|
Post by seanwalsh on Jan 8, 2007 13:49:02 GMT -5
If the 'E knows what's good for em, the hype begins now and don't stop til.............whenever this month the Rumble happens!
Even though the product sucks, this has always been quite literally the most wonderful time of my wrestling year. Hopefully they don't foul it up too badly.
|
|
4real
Wade Wilson
Posts: 28,626
|
Post by 4real on Jan 8, 2007 13:56:45 GMT -5
I'm pulling for The Great Khali to win. He's just so big!!
|
|
Copeland
Tommy Wiseau
Rated Highly?
You have just witnessed The Copeland Effect
Posts: 99
|
Post by Copeland on Jan 8, 2007 14:01:14 GMT -5
I wonder if Goldust will return again?
|
|
|
|
Post by emoney3265 on Jan 8, 2007 14:03:15 GMT -5
Khali wins it. If he fell out of the ring, the ECW Main Event for Wrestlemania would be ruined for him vs Trashley. Khali would manage hurting himself if he fell out of the ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by George Harrison on Jan 8, 2007 14:05:04 GMT -5
WWE must know how bad it was for Mabel to win the KOTR, surely they can forsee how sickening Khali winning the Rumble would be, in the age of the internet thay couldn't take that chance, could they lol?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Boss on Jan 8, 2007 14:11:54 GMT -5
I wish the WWF would end the stipulation that the winner of the Royal Rumble ig garenteed a World title match at WrestleMania. It limits the potential winners. In the old days anyone could win it depending on the luck of the draw. Now it's automatically limited to five or so possibilities which makes the rest of it a waist of time.
The winner should get a World title match on TV but not WrestleMania. This way we can once again enjoy the Royal Rumble with no idea who is going to win.
|
|
Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Jan 8, 2007 14:13:31 GMT -5
I wish the WWF would end the stipulation that the winner of the Royal Rumble ig garenteed a World title match at WrestleMania. It limits the potential winners. In the old days anyone could win it depending on the luck of the draw. Now it's automatically limited to five or so possibilities which makes the rest of it a waist of time. The winner should get a World title match on TV but not WrestleMania. This way we can once again enjoy the Royal Rumble with no idea who is going to win. I'm going to restate my old idea of having no former WWE Champions in the Rumble. In fact, the Rumble could become the Money in the Bank match. |
|
|
|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Jan 8, 2007 14:22:06 GMT -5
If the 'E knows what's good for em, the hype begins now and don't stop til.............whenever this month the Rumble happens! Even though the product sucks, this has always been quite literally the most wonderful time of my wrestling year. Hopefully they don't foul it up too badly. Well, it BETTER start tonight, with the Rumble in only 20 days! |
|
|
|
Post by The Boss on Jan 8, 2007 14:26:50 GMT -5
I wish the WWF would end the stipulation that the winner of the Royal Rumble ig garenteed a World title match at WrestleMania. It limits the potential winners. In the old days anyone could win it depending on the luck of the draw. Now it's automatically limited to five or so possibilities which makes the rest of it a waist of time. The winner should get a World title match on TV but not WrestleMania. This way we can once again enjoy the Royal Rumble with no idea who is going to win. I'm going to restate my old idea of having no former WWE Champions in the Rumble. In fact, the Rumble could become the Money in the Bank match. What's wrong with having former chanpions in the Royal Rumble? With the way the WWF has been playing hot potato with the titles these past few years almost everyone is a former champion. |
|
Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Jan 8, 2007 15:38:22 GMT -5
I'm going to restate my old idea of having no former WWE Champions in the Rumble. In fact, the Rumble could become the Money in the Bank match. What's wrong with having former chanpions in the Royal Rumble? With the way the WWF has been playing hot potato with the titles these past few years almost everyone is a former champion. It would help to build new stars, and it would bring back the aura of mystique about the Rumble. Yuo can build up several people as legitimate threats to win, instead of one or two obvious choices. Then, with the MITB clause, you can build up the winner even more over the course of a year. |
|
|
|
Post by seanwalsh on Jan 8, 2007 15:48:13 GMT -5
If the 'E knows what's good for em, the hype begins now and don't stop til.............whenever this month the Rumble happens! Even though the product sucks, this has always been quite literally the most wonderful time of my wrestling year. Hopefully they don't foul it up too badly. Well, it BETTER start tonight, with the Rumble in only 20 days! Then again, they didn't announce all but 2 matches for D2D until........well, when the wrestlers started heading down the ring at D2D. But this is the Rumble. No offense to WWECW, but Rumble >>>>>> D2D and most other PPVs. |
|
|
|
Post by seanwalsh on Jan 8, 2007 15:49:32 GMT -5
I'm going to restate my old idea of having no former WWE Champions in the Rumble. In fact, the Rumble could become the Money in the Bank match. What's wrong with having former chanpions in the Royal Rumble? With the way the WWF has been playing hot potato with the titles these past few years almost everyone is a former champion. I'd rather see a Rumble match with no former champions - or even Rumble winners. That way, guys like Scotty 2 Hotty, Funaki, the Highlanders, Snitsky, Jamie Noble, the FBI, Stevie Richards and Val Venis would *have* to be involved!  |
|
|
|
Post by G✇JI☈A on Jan 8, 2007 15:52:25 GMT -5
I guess we will see the Rumble Qualifying matches start tonight.
You know the ones were somehow the loser gets into the Rumble anyway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2007 15:54:44 GMT -5
I wish the WWF would end the stipulation that the winner of the Royal Rumble ig garenteed a World title match at WrestleMania. It limits the potential winners. In the old days anyone could win it depending on the luck of the draw. Now it's automatically limited to five or so possibilities which makes the rest of it a waist of time. The winner should get a World title match on TV but not WrestleMania. This way we can once again enjoy the Royal Rumble with no idea who is going to win. I'm going to restate my old idea of having no former WWE Champions in the Rumble. In fact, the Rumble could become the Money in the Bank match. I like that idea right there. Have the title match after the rumble and have people wondering if the rumble winner cashes it that night, or simply waits. Id love to just turn on Smackdown (I work Monday nights), and find out someone cashed their shot in. |
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Jan 8, 2007 15:55:14 GMT -5
If the 'E knows what's good for em, the hype begins now and don't stop til.............whenever this month the Rumble happens! Even though the product sucks, this has always been quite literally the most wonderful time of my wrestling year. Hopefully they don't foul it up too badly. Well, it BETTER start tonight, with the Rumble in only 20 days! It's often said that the Road to Wrestlemania begins with the Royal Rumble. Therefore, technically, the Road to Wrestlemania begins tonight, or even on Friday when Smackdown had the beat the clock matches, even though those weren't for the rumble match specifically. |
|
Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Jan 8, 2007 15:55:15 GMT -5
I bet that Cryme Tyme will HILARIOUSLY steal someone else's spot in the Rumble match.
|
|
|
|
Post by seanwalsh on Jan 8, 2007 15:58:31 GMT -5
Well, it BETTER start tonight, with the Rumble in only 20 days! It's often said that the Road to Wrestlemania begins with the Royal Rumble. Therefore, technically, the Road to Wrestlemania begins tonight, or even on Friday when Smackdown had the beat the clock matches, even though those weren't for the rumble match specifically. Dammit, I KNEW I should've started with "technically the Road to WM starts tonight". ARGH! I'd like to think that those wrestlers who win in the BtC matches on Smackdown but don't get the shortest time would automatically be put in the Rumble as a reward for winning in the first place... |
|
|
|
Post by The Scuba Guy on Jan 8, 2007 16:06:51 GMT -5
BIg Dick Johnson=#5  |
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Jan 8, 2007 16:21:14 GMT -5
Of course Goldust will return again this year and the announcers will act like its the most suprising thing ever...
|
|
|
|
Post by krazysane on Jan 8, 2007 16:55:35 GMT -5
Right now I officaly put my name in the 2007 royal rumble.. and im going to win
|
|
