Watts
Tommy Wiseau
Posts: 87
|
Post by Watts on Jan 7, 2007 13:20:18 GMT -5
Sure, SD has some great wrestling action, but RAW is the flagship... and simply, lots of folks don't sit home on Friday night to watch wrestling... why is Taker still on SD? Shouldnt he be on RAW? He is an icon, indeed...
|
|
|
|
Post by odanobunaga on Jan 7, 2007 13:23:14 GMT -5
1) Hey, they need draws at Smackdown. With no Undertaker or Kane, the brand would have less Big, Strong faces.
2) It´s taped, so he could make his mumbo jumbo and edit later, like the lightnings etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharpy Snow on Jan 7, 2007 13:49:48 GMT -5
Taker dosn't work Monday's  (Wait's for obvious Long comment) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2007 13:56:13 GMT -5
because they'd have to job him to Umaga, and the Takah don't like that, belee that playah.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aaron E. Dangerously on Jan 7, 2007 13:58:45 GMT -5
Taker dosn't work Monday's (Wait's for obvious Long comment) Since you don't want to work mondays, Mark Calloway, I've got some news for ya. Tonight, it's gonna be you, one on one with...THE UNDERTAKAH! |
|
|
|
Post by wwefan78 on Jan 7, 2007 14:26:08 GMT -5
I read somewhere that Triple H and Taker both being kinda locker-roomleaders don't get along backstage. That's the main reason I've heard that they are kept on separate brands..and thus no Undertaker on RAW..
|
|
