Is Kennedy Really Suspended?

[Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You]

I'm completely serious. He was on Raw, he wasn't written off, and we have no means to confirm that he is on the dreaded list.

Keeping in mind news sites have an atrocious trend of downright bullcrapping, has everyone here really been convinced he won't be around next week?

[machinegun]

I really don't care

I hope so, just so someone else could take his spot. Kennedy does nothing for me

[Crappler El 0 M]

WWE hasn't confirmed it, but they didn't really confirm Jeff Hardy either and he came back after 30 days had passed. Don't forget, Haas and Umaga were on TV and I don't think its too much of a spoiler to tell you that other names on that list will show up on TV later in the week.

[Mozenrath]

It seems like he's in the clear. Probably helped that he owned up to it, and explained, before the suspensions came about.

[Seth Drakin of Monster Crap]

Honestly, with the way they ended that segment of basically having Ken Kennedy lie, Vince will suspend him indefinately storyline wise.

[ACG2x]

He still could be suspended. The only major storyline he was even remotely involved with were the constant teasers that he was Vince's son.

Now that they've said he's not, he could dissapear for 30 days and really not many people outside his fanbase and of course us here would notice.

They needed to write Umaga out because he was the IC champ. They needed to write Regal out because he's the GM. People expect to see those guys week in and week out. Kennedy was not a champion nor was he in a GM role. Easy guy to just have vanish for 30 days.

[Michael Coello]

"Confirmation? We don't need no stinking confirmation!"

[chickenwhopper]

machinegun said:

I really don't care

I hope so, just so someone else could take his spot. Kennedy does nothing for me

[Corporate H]

I think last night pretty much confirmed that he's not.

[Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You]

I'm not saying that he's definitely in the clear for having not been written off, I just think there's nothing to support the suspension claim.

[deformedunclelouie]

I could see Vince throwing Kennedy off for what he did on Raw as a storyline.

[Desi]

We'll find out next week, won't we?

[Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You]

setsunameioh said:

We'll find out next week, won't we?

Absolutely. You would think looking around here that it's in stone though.

[MichaelRBoh]

he's going to be destroyed by cena next week and get "injured"

[rra]

grapplercrappler said:

WWE hasn't confirmed it, but they didn't really confirm Jeff Hardy either and he came back after 30 days had passed. Don't forget, Haas and Umaga were on TV and I don't think its too much of a spoiler to tell you that other names on that list will show up on TV later in the week.

Wasn't that cover story that he was trying to recover from that damn painful head-drop in that Kennedy match weeks back?

At least, that was the cover story.

[CM Punk's Favorite Boobs]

Kennedy doesn't have to be suspended necessarily and he wasn't been written off. He was taken out of the role as Vince's son, but that could have been a decision that was made prior to the suspensions, although highly unlikely.

Him being taken out of the role could be a consequence of him being on the list. Wouldn't be the first time WWE has only done a minor consequence to something serious. For all we know, the guys that got suspended could be WAY different than the list that has been floating around lately.

[doytch]

mr kennedy did steroids is what has been bringed. i doubt it he is not so much fat as he is with good shape and tatoos. he is not really vince son so it opens many doors. wwe for years half been telling that obvious choice isnt the right one.