|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Jun 20, 2007 19:45:13 GMT -5
I think that TNA should tape iMPACT live instead of taping 3 shows in one night. If they do that the spoilers will be leaked in the internet and nowon will watch iMPACT. I am very tempted to read spoilers, but i stop myself. The element of surprise wont be there when u watch iMPACT.
|
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Jun 20, 2007 19:50:27 GMT -5
They tape 2 shows in one night usually.
Unless there is only 3 weeks between ppvs, or 5 weeks.
Doing 4 live impacts a month seems a little cost inefficent. Setting up everything that many times a month to tape like 30 minutes of in-ring stuff.
Maybe it would make more sense once they have a two hour show, since then taping multiple episodes would take a LONG time.
|
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Jun 20, 2007 20:07:39 GMT -5
Half the time I can barely understand the spoilers anyway because they're so damned confusing so it's like I haven't read them at all. And I usually forget what's going to happen by the time the 2nd and/or 3rd week rolls around.
|
|
Big Hurt
Samurai Cop
Hot damn!
Posts: 2,118
|
Post by Big Hurt on Jun 20, 2007 20:17:17 GMT -5
Do you mean they should air Impact Live? Cuz they always TAPE it Live.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Jun 20, 2007 20:28:45 GMT -5
Do you mean they should air Impact Live? Cuz they always TAPE it Live. Yea I tried to tape stuff after it happened once. I wasn't very successful. |
|
Efren
Dennis Stamp
?Andale! ?Andale!
Posts: 3,674
|
Post by Efren on Jun 20, 2007 20:37:57 GMT -5
Its not really cost eficient and considering how bland most regular Impacts are people wouldnt get the urge to tune in, if anything a good spoiler makes people that read em tune in.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Jun 20, 2007 22:43:15 GMT -5
Do you mean they should air Impact Live? Cuz they always TAPE it Live. yeah thats what i ment. TNA should tape impact live once they get 2 hours. |
|
Jay Peas 42
El Dandy
Totally flips out ALL the time.
Is looking forward to a Nation of Domination Kwannza Special.
Posts: 8,329 
|
Post by Jay Peas 42 on Jun 20, 2007 22:59:54 GMT -5
What for? The WWF tapes Smackdown, and would probably still tape RAW is WAR if not for Rick Rude, so it's not as if it keeps the group from reaching national status. Taping is cheaper, lets them get more episodes out of fewer events, and makes editing and production easier.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Jun 20, 2007 23:02:24 GMT -5
What for? The WWF tapes Smackdown, and would probably still tape RAW is WAR if not for Rick Rude, so it's not as if it keeps the group from reaching national status. Taping is cheaper, lets them get more episodes out of fewer events, and makes editing and production easier. Besides how many people actually read spoilers. A fraction of the audience. And most of those probably watch anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by OGBoardPoster2005 on Jun 20, 2007 23:27:46 GMT -5
I suggested a while back they do alternate doing Impact live one week and taped the next
|
|
|
|
Post by Tha Kid Joker on Jun 20, 2007 23:34:13 GMT -5
Do you mean they should air Impact Live? Cuz they always TAPE it Live. Yea I tried to tape stuff after it happened once. I wasn't very successful. Great set-up and execution. Bravo. |
|
jobber2thestars
Hank Scorpio
Buy the Simon System. You'll thank yourself.
Posts: 7,097
|
Post by jobber2thestars on Jun 20, 2007 23:41:45 GMT -5
Do you mean they should air Impact Live? Cuz they always TAPE it Live. Yea I tried to tape stuff after it happened once. I wasn't very successful. "Very few cartoons are broadcast live, it's a terrible strain on the animators' wrists." |
|
|
|
Post by x on Jun 21, 2007 4:34:12 GMT -5
Do you mean they should air Impact Live? Cuz they always TAPE it Live. yeah thats what i ment. TNA should tape impact live once they get 2 hours. I take it you didn't get what he said? |
|
|
|
Post by Mister Pigwell on Jun 21, 2007 4:39:23 GMT -5
Live wouldn't work right now, they edit a LOT out of their shows.. a WHOLE lot. wed have to wait for 2 hour time slot and then it'd be the same product we have now but a lot of useless crap in between.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChitownKnight on Jun 21, 2007 13:16:22 GMT -5
it didnt really make sense to me when scott steiner came out last week on impact while several sources said that he was injured.
|
|
|
|
Post by evanlovesmeg on Jun 21, 2007 13:23:19 GMT -5
Its not really cost eficient and considering how bland most regular Impacts are people wouldnt get the urge to tune in, if anything a good spoiler makes people that read em tune in. people tune into raw... |
|
|
|
Post by Old School Heel mark4Morishima on Jun 21, 2007 13:37:13 GMT -5
No. They should make adequate use of the resources they already have before throwing even more money around. The best thing they could do would be cut half the roster.
|
|
Blindkarevik
Grimlock
Rock... Paper... Straight-edge!
I Like To <blank>
Posts: 14,343
|
Post by Blindkarevik on Jun 21, 2007 15:04:55 GMT -5
It's kindof a double-edge sword.... on the one hand, it'd definitely be more exciting each week. But, on the other, they don't really have the financial resources to do this. Of course, that could change with more viewers and everything... but it's all risk.
It's guaranteed to be cheaper by taping several episodes at a time.... and it's not guaranteed that there'd be any spike in viewership if it went live.
We can all hope for a new Monday Night War, or even just two live wrestling shows a week... but honestly, it won't be happening for quite a while if at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fruity Delicious Skittles on Jun 21, 2007 15:12:37 GMT -5
Whats the point when the TNA product is garbage?
|
|
|
|
Post by Danimal on Jun 21, 2007 17:15:04 GMT -5
If they get the second-hour I'm pretty sure they'll just tape one Impact at a time. Unfortunately til then doing one hour at a time doesn't make a lot of sense. It would be expensive and crowds will be less likely to show for such a short event.
|
|
