|
|
Post by psychokiller on Jun 26, 2007 19:12:49 GMT -5
I think TNA should go back to using the traditional 4 sided ring because the 6 sides is very pointless. It has no purpose whatsoever and it makes it look very weird when they wrestle in bigger arenas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tha Kid Joker on Jun 26, 2007 19:15:37 GMT -5
Eh... I don't mind the six-sided ring, but picturing a four-sided ring in my head, they would look better with it.
But of course, they won't, because that'll screw up six sides of steel, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by psychokiller on Jun 26, 2007 19:17:01 GMT -5
Well they could just use the 6 sided ring for the Lockdown PPV to make it look unique from the others. Besides those gimmicky X-division matches suck really bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by leemir on Jun 26, 2007 19:17:03 GMT -5
I prefer 4 but 6 is cool. TNA 6 sided looks too stiff or something, AAAs looks better.
|
|
|
|
Post by KevFalcön07 on Jun 26, 2007 19:18:57 GMT -5
four sided ring, not that I personally have a problem with TNA's ring but it just don't seem right
|
|
Jeff
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,074
|
Post by Jeff on Jun 26, 2007 20:06:23 GMT -5
I like 6 it gives wrestlers more space. But I also like 4 and i have no real preference. I basically voted 6 because it was losing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyno on Jun 26, 2007 20:24:08 GMT -5
I vote for the Squared Circle. The Hexagoned Circle just doesn't sound as good. Also, I'm a mark for traditional rings.
Sure, the six-sided ring is probably better for the X-Division guys, but ...well, we know how TNA feels about them lately.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2007 20:26:41 GMT -5
Smaller 4 Sided ring inside of larger 6 sided ring ;D.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimichiro Likes Erick Rowan on Jun 27, 2007 2:58:26 GMT -5
A ring's a ring. I really doubt TNA's matches would be any different if they used 4 corners, just as well I doubt WWE/anyone else with a 4 sided ring's matches would be any different with 6 corners.
Sorry, but I care about what's INSIDE the ring, not the ring itself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2007 3:11:20 GMT -5
In all honesty, they should just stick to the six sided one. Anything that let's them stand out from the WWE can only help them.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilikeRusso. on Jun 27, 2007 4:21:49 GMT -5
i find you see more action in the hexagonal ring view point =)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2007 4:24:59 GMT -5
I say, 8 sides!
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Jun 27, 2007 11:10:48 GMT -5
I vote four, but I don't watch TNA, so I really don't care.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on Jun 27, 2007 11:22:34 GMT -5
I've yet to see the 6-sided ring have any real use except for gimmicked X-Division matches that usually suck.
|
|
|
|
Post by Danimal on Jun 27, 2007 16:41:41 GMT -5
The extra corners make the ring more spot-friendly, I like it.
|
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Jun 27, 2007 16:46:59 GMT -5
2-sided ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Jun 27, 2007 18:39:41 GMT -5
I don't sully my hands with anything that has less sides then a chiliagon.
|
|
Samoa Kenny
Unicron
The WrestleCrap Forums #1 heel
Posts: 2,629
|
Post by Samoa Kenny on Jun 27, 2007 19:01:32 GMT -5
Why not just go with an 8 sided ring? Its working for UFC, which really is the biggest thing going right now in the world of teenage boys(Insert your own joke)
|
|
|
|
Post by RandomHero on Jun 27, 2007 19:16:16 GMT -5
A ring's a ring. I really doubt TNA's matches would be any different if they used 4 corners, just as well I doubt WWE/anyone else with a 4 sided ring's matches would be any different with 6 corners. Sorry, but I care about what's INSIDE the ring, not the ring itself. This would be the correct answer. |
|
|
|
Post by brutuscheesecake on Jun 27, 2007 20:57:52 GMT -5
I want a 3 sided triangle ring
|
|
