|
|
Post by x on Oct 28, 2007 12:46:07 GMT -5
If Batista was still on Raw and Cena was still on Smackdown who would be the WWE and World Champions right now?
(Let's assume Cena is not hurt because he hadn't wrestled Kennedy since Kennedy went to Raw.)
|
|
Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Oct 28, 2007 12:50:35 GMT -5
Cena would be over and liked by most people as WHC champ I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by 01 Mark! on Oct 28, 2007 12:52:35 GMT -5
I'd have to say that Cena would be champion on Smackdown and Trips would be the champ on RAW. Im not saying Batista would never be the RAW champ, Im just saying he would nt be the champ right now. Also Id think they would Batista be a heel
|
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Oct 28, 2007 13:00:21 GMT -5
It'd have been slightly less stale for both men.
Cena would have been more well received on SmackDown: the more character-oriented brand, and would have carried the show better during the "Curse" period.
Batista on RAW could have worked with more interesting (and better) Superstars, who'd have helped in "hiding" his weaknesses.
|
|
Big L
Grimlock
Posts: 13,883
|
Post by Big L on Oct 28, 2007 13:03:42 GMT -5
I'd have to say that Cena would be champion on Smackdown and Trips would be the champ on RAW. Im not saying Batista would never be the RAW champ, Im just saying he would nt be the champ right now. Also Id think they would Batista be a heel agreed |
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 122,183
|
Post by Mozenrath on Oct 28, 2007 13:19:55 GMT -5
Batista and Cena would still be drinking Coca Cola, Punk having not shown them the error of their ways.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilikeRusso. on Oct 28, 2007 13:26:50 GMT -5
Cena would be over and liked by most people as WHC champ I think. I f***ing agree 100%, QFT QFT QFT ( If Cena hadn't of changed brands i might of wait I WOULD OF gave him credit but nah f*** it hes dogshit live and his moveset is as bad as hulk hogans. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2007 13:29:41 GMT -5
Cena would be doing fine, Batista probably would have been fired.
|
|
|
|
Post by royboy8 on Oct 28, 2007 14:06:11 GMT -5
The thing I think of is what the Cena Eddie storyline would have been like(assuming They did they same thing with Cena that they ended up doing with Dave on SD)
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Oct 28, 2007 14:09:47 GMT -5
Their booking would be completely different.
I noticed something when Batista had a mini feud with Deuce n' Domino. During the one-on-one matches, he was very dominent because he was a former World Champion. Obviously, he's going to have the advantage. However, during tag team matches, he was always beaten down pretty bad, and never got a tag team win over them via pinfall. In that situation, Deuce n' Domino had the advantage, and it showed during their matches.
If it was John Cena and on Raw, Cena would beat both Deuce and Domino in under 5 minutes. And Cena actually did team up with Candice Michelle and beat Cade, Murdoch and Umaga. That would be the biggest difference. Cena wouldn't be booked so insane like he was during his title run.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 122,183
|
Post by Mozenrath on Oct 28, 2007 14:10:41 GMT -5
I'd like to point out that if they didn't switch brands, Cena would still of been WWE champ, since the belts used to be on opposite shows. He wouldn't be WHC.
|
|
|
|
Post by primetime110 on Oct 28, 2007 14:47:51 GMT -5
We would never had the Edge-Cena feud on Raw. With Edge being the only guy having any kind of sucess vs Cena. To be fair, The Taker-Batista would not have happened and that feud is pretty interesting.
|
|
