|
|
Post by hypnoticgenes on Oct 29, 2007 16:15:48 GMT -5
What if the WWE made an Internet title. It would kinda be like a TV title, but it would be defended on WWE.com.
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfmoon103100 on Oct 29, 2007 16:17:04 GMT -5
Val would be the champ.
|
|
|
|
Post by salsashark on Oct 29, 2007 16:18:42 GMT -5
No one would care.
It would be need to be seen on WWE TV to make any kind of impact or gain a reputation. Imagine the crowds of kids who don't visit WWE.com seeing a title defended and not knowing what the f*** the title is for.
|
|
Zutroy
Don Corleone
That's preposterous. Zutroy here is as American as apple pie.
Posts: 1,933
|
Post by Zutroy on Oct 29, 2007 16:18:53 GMT -5
"WWE Internet fans don't matter or are worth our time Title"
|
|
Libertine
Unicron
Cerebral Caustic
Posts: 3,082 
|
Post by Libertine on Oct 29, 2007 16:18:55 GMT -5
I think Matt Hardy would have a long run with it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2007 16:18:58 GMT -5
They should totally have Cyber Wrestling. Similar to the sexual version, but with wrestling.
"Suplex."
"Hip Toss."
"1, 2 ... no."
"ARMBAR!"
|
|
|
|
Post by voiceboxisback on Oct 29, 2007 16:41:53 GMT -5
What if the WWE made an Internet title. It would kinda be like a TV title, but it would be defended on WWE.com. There is already a title like that.... or will be soon, the ECW Title |
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Oct 29, 2007 16:44:14 GMT -5
What if the WWE made an Internet title. It would kinda be like a TV title, but it would be defended on WWE.com. There is already a title like that.... or will be soon, the ECW Title Yeah, since you know, they didn't just resign with Sci-Fi for another year or anything.... |
|
|
|
Post by voiceboxisback on Oct 29, 2007 16:44:47 GMT -5
There is already a title like that.... or will be soon, the ECW Title Yeah, since you know, they didn't just resign with Sci-Fi for another year or anything.... Wait they did? AWESOME |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2007 16:46:27 GMT -5
Shannon Moore would be ineligible, because he's not here to impress the internet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lenny: Smooth like Keith Stone on Oct 29, 2007 16:46:36 GMT -5
No one would care. It would be need to be seen on WWE TV to make any kind of impact or gain a reputation. Imagine the crowds of kids who don't visit WWE.com seeing a title defended and not knowing what the smurf the title is for. But they wouldn't see the title being defended if they didn't look at WWE.com, since it would only be defended online. It would never be defended on TV or PPV. The TV announcers might mention it, and then tell the viewers that they can go to WWE.com to see the matches. So if anything, the title would be like a huge advertisement for WWE.com. |
|
EJS
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,857
|
Post by EJS on Oct 29, 2007 16:49:59 GMT -5
No one would care. It would be need to be seen on WWE TV to make any kind of impact or gain a reputation. Imagine the crowds of kids who don't visit WWE.com seeing a title defended and not knowing what the smurf the title is for. But they wouldn't see the title being defended if they didn't look at WWE.com, since it would only be defended online. It would never be defended on TV or PPV. The TV announcers might mention it, and then tell the viewers that they can go to WWE.com to see the matches. So if anything, the title would be like a huge advertisement for WWE.com. So are these matches happening in an empty room or something? Or how about in a CYBER ARENA like that thing WCW did with their jobbers on the WCW.com Powersite in an "arena" of cg fire and spikes? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2007 16:51:31 GMT -5
Why not? Might not be a big deal but it couldn't hurt anything.
Just have it on the heat tapings...some little storyline to decide the winner, and then you can see the title defended on heat. I'm sure some extra folks would go ahead and watch heat with a special heat title on there.
Would give a little more meaning to a Shelton Benjamin vs Val Venis match at least.
|
|
|
|
Post by deformedunclelouie on Oct 29, 2007 20:32:02 GMT -5
Mheh, why the hell not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lenny: Smooth like Keith Stone on Oct 29, 2007 20:46:14 GMT -5
But they wouldn't see the title being defended if they didn't look at WWE.com, since it would only be defended online. It would never be defended on TV or PPV. The TV announcers might mention it, and then tell the viewers that they can go to WWE.com to see the matches. So if anything, the title would be like a huge advertisement for WWE.com. So are these matches happening in an empty room or something? Or how about in a CYBER ARENA like that thing WCW did with their jobbers on the WCW.com Powersite in an "arena" of cg fire and spikes? No, they could have a crowd. Just tape the matches prior to Raw or Smackdown. Like maybe Heat would have one less match, and in its place they would have this match for the internet title. Prior to the match, the announcer would explain that the match was being taped exclusively for WWE.com, so once again it would be good advertising for the site. |
|
