|
|
Post by joeman on Nov 5, 2007 10:39:28 GMT -5
It's obvious there is a conception here that WWE loves bulky men, with being very tell as a plus. There is also another conception that WWE would use cruiserweights as bait for these hosses. I ask this, what is WWE's stance with wrestlers who is very tall but are thin as a beanpole? What is the history of lanky wrestlers in the WWE, do they get pushed or jobbed out? Edge fits the description perfectly, and he is world champion.
|
|
Mitch 4:20
Don Corleone
The Cherry One
Posts: 2,062
|
Post by Mitch 4:20 on Nov 5, 2007 10:41:08 GMT -5
NO!  |
|
Turd Ferguson
Hank Scorpio
John Cena: Colossal Douche
Posts: 7,402
|
Post by Turd Ferguson on Nov 5, 2007 10:51:01 GMT -5
Purely lanky wrestlers (Sean Waltman) are usually jobbers.
Lanky wrestlers with potbellies (Jake Roberts) are okay, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by pathogen on Nov 5, 2007 11:14:40 GMT -5
Giant Gonzales perhaps answers your question?
|
|
|
|
Post by joeman on Nov 5, 2007 11:20:45 GMT -5
Well Giant Gonzales was one of them, but WWE also had Chris Masters when he was much lighter. Masters jobbed quite a bit when he lost 50 pounds during that time. I'd imagine he was an exception though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jared Has Been Enlightened :) on Nov 5, 2007 11:40:20 GMT -5
You can be underweight as long as you have height to back it up (Edge, Orton, Windham, Jake).
|
|
Mitch 4:20
Don Corleone
The Cherry One
Posts: 2,062
|
Post by Mitch 4:20 on Nov 6, 2007 10:30:30 GMT -5
nobody marked for Tomko? Man, I'm always late getting to the latest fads....
*re-tight rolls cuffs to stone washed jeans*
|
|
