|
|
Post by GuyOfOwnage on Nov 6, 2007 10:22:39 GMT -5
As the IWC, we all have varying opinions on how the WWE is booked. Some of us enjoy it, but others denounce it and claim that they could do better. Of course, your stereotypical "smark" probably wouldn't last a day trying to run a billion dollar company, and has no concept of key demographics and whatnot. My question to you is, if all booking power in WWE was handed over to the internet wrestling community, how long do you think it take for the company to go under?
|
|
|
|
Post by macdaddysquid on Nov 6, 2007 10:24:33 GMT -5
pretty quick becasue we would have the sheltons, the Burkes, and all the other OVER RATED garbage wrestlers as champions.
|
|
edgehead
Dennis Stamp
Not a Poopyhead
Posts: 4,086 
|
Post by edgehead on Nov 6, 2007 10:25:13 GMT -5
Not very long. because it would not appear to younger demographics as much.
|
|
|
|
Post by PTBartman on Nov 6, 2007 10:26:55 GMT -5
a week. We couldn't even agree where to have lunch let alone who should be pushed.
|
|
Mr. Mediocre
Hank Scorpio
Bert Early?... sorry, that's a typo. Butt. Ugly.
Much better since I was last here.
Posts: 6,249
|
Post by Mr. Mediocre on Nov 6, 2007 10:29:33 GMT -5
Not very long. because it would not appear to younger demographics as much. I don't know...when the WWF blatantly ignored the younger demographics during the Attitude Era, business seemed to be going pretty well. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenny Brockelstein on Nov 6, 2007 10:29:54 GMT -5
Yeah it would be a disaster. As soon as Super Crazy's squash over John Cena aired on the first Raw Is Marksville, the company would be in serious trouble.
|
|
