Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Nov 19, 2007 13:26:57 GMT -5
Since WWE's roster is so large and underutilized, what if they had two Royal Rumble matches in one night? The winners of the two matches would meet in the main event and the winner would receive the Wrestlemania title shot.
That would mean there would most likely be no title defenses at the Royal Rumble, since both Rumbles would last over an hour and the #1 contender match would receive some good time, but what do you guys think about it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Digby Stamp on Nov 19, 2007 13:32:18 GMT -5
I think it's an interesting idea, but from a kayfabe standpoint, it seems like whoever wins the 2nd Rumble of the night would be at a huge disadvantage.
Maybe they can just have a match between the two at No Way Out.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Nov 19, 2007 13:33:47 GMT -5
Nah, as the fans would be exhausted seeing two Rumble matches in one night. One Rumble is good enough.
|
|
Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Nov 19, 2007 13:33:49 GMT -5
I think it's an interesting idea, but from a kayfabe standpoint, it seems like whoever wins the 2nd Rumble of the night would be at a huge disadvantage. Maybe they can just have a match between the two at No Way Out. In that case, maybe they can stick a match between the second Rumble and the main event. Maybe a Women's Title match. |
|
mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319 
|
Post by mrjl on Nov 19, 2007 13:40:19 GMT -5
I have thought they should turn it into a forty man battle royal, since there's never a point where all the men were in the ring.
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,372
|
Post by Push R Truth on Nov 19, 2007 13:47:09 GMT -5
60 man Rumble. 1 Minute between entrances.
It would be an hour of delicious wrestling chaos.
Anybody capable of physically competing should be in it.
|
|
|
|
Post by seano on Nov 19, 2007 14:36:36 GMT -5
60 man Rumble. 1 Minute between entrances. It would be an hour of delicious wrestling chaos. Indeed. ;D However, you'd still have 2 more hours of show to book before it and IMHO the Rumbles that seem weakest are the ones where they reuse talent from those pre-Rumble matchs again in the Rumble match. |
|
Turd Ferguson
Hank Scorpio
John Cena: Colossal Douche
Posts: 7,402
|
Post by Turd Ferguson on Nov 19, 2007 14:53:47 GMT -5
They should have a 4 royal rumble tournament. 4 Rumbles in a night, with the 4 winners in a "final 4" style match.
The winner then has a one hour iron man match with the champion at that point.
I love 7 hour PPVs.
|
|
Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Nov 19, 2007 14:59:55 GMT -5
They should have a 4 royal rumble tournament. 4 Rumbles in a night, with the 4 winners in a "final 4" style match. The winner then has a one hour iron man match with the champion at that point. I love 7 hour PPVs. You should meet TNARick. |
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Nov 19, 2007 15:04:13 GMT -5
How about this, you take the 60 guys, split them up into 3 groups of 20 and put each group into a different ring. Then you have 3 rings, with 3 seperate battle royals happening.
Once your down to 20 total people left, they all get into the middle ring and finish it. Last one standing wins.
What do you think?
On second thought, thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard. Who the hell would do something like that???
........Oh yeah.
|
|
