|
Post by ChitownKnight on Nov 21, 2007 10:46:55 GMT -5
HHH should have one last title run at Wrestlemania, and then put mid-cards over
|
|
|
Post by Loki on Nov 21, 2007 11:09:24 GMT -5
i totally understand you don't have to lose to someone clean to put them over, but if you hardly EVER do it, it does get annoying. I respectfully disagree. An hard fought match against Triple H can make anybody look like a million bucks, regardless of the outcome. An honourable defeat is sometimes better than a meaningless victory over somebody who has lost aganist half of the roster. Hogan never lost cleanly to a heel in his whole WWF tenure, Austin and Rock always had their matches ending with run-ins and similar antics... With the "MNW-style" of booking, the win-loss record lost a lot of meaning, given that the same superstars square off against eachother every week. Triple H doesn't have to give wins away left and right (like Foley and Flair), because as long as he keeps winning, a PPV win against Triple H will MEAN SOMETHING. I'll buy into the usual "HHHogging the spotlight" campaing when/if he'll pedigree Jeff, Jericho and Orton in the same RAW/PPV, winning the belts.
|
|
|
Post by poi zen rana on Nov 21, 2007 11:39:46 GMT -5
i have no problem with him winning a lot. the guy is major over, and has given tons to the company. he does deserve to be on top. however, i just feel there are some matches i would really like to see him lose. when facing someone who has been built up as a huge monster (umaga) i personally would have loved to see umaga go over hhh, and don't think it would lessen his value. i personally would have loved to see the tag team champions beat him because i don't think that would make him look bad. i don't think he should be flair or foley and put everyone over there are just a select few times i think a loss would be better for all involved.
|
|