|
Post by Just "Dan" is Fine, Thank You on Nov 25, 2007 18:20:42 GMT -5
It has to be a Raw chamber, simply based on rosters.
|
|
BHB
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,778
|
Post by BHB on Nov 25, 2007 18:41:05 GMT -5
Sounds good.
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Nov 25, 2007 18:46:10 GMT -5
is it wrong that I wish to somehow see Mysterio hit a 619 to someone who is ontop of one of the pods? like he climbs up and holds onto the fence while kicking himself around
|
|
mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319
|
Post by mrjl on Nov 25, 2007 22:20:25 GMT -5
It has to be a Raw chamber, simply based on rosters. And why is that? Smackdown has Rey, Kane, Khali, Mark Henry, Finley, MVP, possibly Big Daddy V and John Morrison and two of these three, Batista, Edge and the Undertaker.
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Nov 26, 2007 1:25:45 GMT -5
On Raw the possibilities could be- HHH, Jericho, Orton, Michaels, Umaga, Kennedy, Flair? On Smackdown- Undertaker, Edge, Batista, Mysterio, Kane, Henry, Kahli, MVP? Lashley will be back before the Rumble, so that... Jericho, Orton, Michaels, Triple H, Umaga, Kennedy, Flair, Hardy If you leave out the champion and one guy to wrestle him at NWO, thats six. On the Smackdown side of things you have... Taker, Edge, Batista, Mysterio, Kane, Finlay, Henry, MVP, Khali, and Hardy. Leave out two guys for a title match, and two guys just to have some random fued going on thats six.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,939
|
Post by Mozenrath on Nov 26, 2007 3:16:30 GMT -5
It be curious to see the Elmination Chamber at WM this year. Especially outside. Also how are they going to do MITB this year? I think they'll have a structure over the ring to where they can hang a suitcase off of. Pretty much like the commercials for the Money in the Bank playset?
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Nov 26, 2007 7:42:52 GMT -5
Is there even enough people on ECW roster to compete in a Elimination Chamber match? Regardless I like this idea, I'm rather certain this will end up a Smackdown match though, cause I think Triple H is pretty much a shoe-in to win the Rumble. I remember the last time we saw ECW do a Elimination Chamber match, it didn't turn out too well.
|
|
Garee
King Koopa
I miss the old days
Posts: 11,338
|
Post by Garee on Nov 26, 2007 13:28:07 GMT -5
I like the idea
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Nov 26, 2007 13:29:33 GMT -5
Is there even enough people on ECW roster to compete in a Elimination Chamber match? Regardless I like this idea, I'm rather certain this will end up a Smackdown match though, cause I think Triple H is pretty much a shoe-in to win the Rumble. I remember the last time we saw ECW do a Elimination Chamber match, it didn't turn out too well. Can't we just all blame Test and move on?
|
|
|
Post by TheMediocreWarrior on Nov 26, 2007 13:30:58 GMT -5
Sounds like an awesome way to get the other contender. I'm glad they aren't abandoning the EC, because it's a good gimmick match, and since it's only done once a year it isn't overdone.
|
|
Sajoa Moe
Patti Mayonnaise
Did you get that thing I sent ya?
A man without gimmick.
Posts: 39,683
|
Post by Sajoa Moe on Nov 26, 2007 13:36:17 GMT -5
I think that the Elimination Chamber competitors should be determined by who the last six competitors remaining from one brand in the Rumble were. That way you have potential for a wild card.
But then, they'll probably end up doing another series of those ridiculously one-sided "qualifying matches", featuring back-and-forth epics like Mark Henry vs. Jimmy Wang Yang, and Khali vs. Jamie Noble.
|
|
Joekishi
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,490
|
Post by Joekishi on Nov 26, 2007 13:40:32 GMT -5
I'm thinking it'll be 6 of the top guys in WWE.
Yeah i'm also thinking the ring for 24 will be the MITB ring from the toy comercials.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2007 13:42:32 GMT -5
I think that the Elimination Chamber competitors should be determined by who the last six competitors remaining from one brand in the Rumble were. That way you have potential for a wild card. But then, they'll probably end up doing another series of those ridiculously one-sided "qualifying matches", featuring back-and-forth epics like Mark Henry vs. Jimmy Wang Yang, and Khali vs. Jamie Noble. They usually work because one of the guys not expected to win usually ends up upsetting somebody. That way you have your job boy in the PPV. (Ok, it doesn't usually end up like that; you just assume "Oh, I know why Noble's there...to lose" and then someone like Kane ends up taking the pin. Good time for Noble to finally get a win.
|
|
Big L
Grimlock
Posts: 13,883
|
Post by Big L on Nov 26, 2007 14:25:55 GMT -5
I think someone from Raw will win the 08 Rumble. Smackdown's won too many. agreed
|
|
mrjl
Fry's dog Seymour
Posts: 20,319
|
Post by mrjl on Nov 26, 2007 19:49:07 GMT -5
I think that the Elimination Chamber competitors should be determined by who the last six competitors remaining from one brand in the Rumble were. That way you have potential for a wild card. But then, they'll probably end up doing another series of those ridiculously one-sided "qualifying matches", featuring back-and-forth epics like Mark Henry vs. Jimmy Wang Yang, and Khali vs. Jamie Noble. I'm sure it'll be more like Rey vs MVP, Edge vs Finley, Undertaker vs Big Daddy V
|
|